Polyethylene wear study on the triathlon total knee prosthesis

ISRCTN ISRCTN12965327
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12965327
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02525588
Secondary identifying numbers K-S-039
Submission date
11/03/2014
Registration date
31/03/2014
Last edited
23/05/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
A knee implant consists of two metal parts with a plastic (polyethylene) bearing part in between. The aim of the study is to assess the differences between two types of bearings regarding fixation and wear. The first type, N2Vac, is commonly used and has excellent results. The other type, X3, is a newer generation and is expected to produce even better results

Who can participate?
Patients who undergo primary total knee replacement

What does the study involve?
Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two groups: N2Vac group or X3 group.
Fixation and wear is measured by X-rays (RSA (röntgen stereophotogrammetric analysis RSA). To be able to do these measurements, a number of tantalum beads (1mm diameter) will be placed in the bone surrounding the prosthesis during the knee surgery and one extra X-ray will be taken during each follow-up.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The study involves the routine assessment of a knee arthroplasty procedure. The devices are CE marked and will be used according to their labelling. The study will help increase knowledge.
Participants will be invited for one extra visit compared to the routine procedure. During each visit the patient will be asked to complete questionnaires about their health, their activities and their knee and one additional RSA X-ray will be taken (the radiation dose falls within acceptable limits).

Where is the study run?
Langeland Hospital, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
The study started in September 2011 and the last enrolment was in June 2014. The study is expected to close in June 2019.

Who is funding the study?
Stryker European Operations BV

Who is the main contact?
Ms Sietske Witvoet
sietske.witvoet@stryker.com

Contact information

Mrs Sietske Witvoet
Scientific

Stryker Nederland BV
Koeweistraat 8
Waardenburg
4181 CD
Netherlands

Study information

Study designSingle-center randomized controlled trial (RCT)
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titlePolyethylene wear study on the triathlon total knee prosthesis: a prospective randomized single centre study
Study objectives1. The primary objective is the assessment of the in vivo wear of the two randomized polyethylene inlay types N2Vac and X3 by means of Roentgen Stereophotogrammetry. It is expected that the X3 group will show significantly less wear after 5 years compared to the conventional N2Vac polyethylene group.
2. The secondary objective is the assessment of prosthetic migration results after two years of the Triathlon CS Peri-Apatite coated tibial and femoral components by means of Roentgen Stereophotogrammetry. It is expected that due to the superior wear qualities of X3 polyethylene this group will show significantly less migration of the prosthesis components after two-years compared to the components in the N2Vac group.
3. The third objective will be the prediction of the long-term survival of the Triathlon CS Peri-Apatite coated tibial and femoral components based on the two-year migration patterns combined with clinical factors and radiographic aspects. In order to identify other clinical parameters besides wear influencing the fixation of the prosthesis components, clinical scores and radiographic aspects will be correlated with the RSA outcome. Subsequently, a long-term prediction can be for the Triathlon CS Peri-Apatite coated tibial and femoral components.
Ethics approval(s)METC Zuidwest Holland, 28/04/2011
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedOsteoarthritis
InterventionPatients are informed and screened pre-operative. Patients that comply with the inclusion/exclusion criteria and who give their consent for participation will be given a study ID. During surgery, the randomization envelope with the corresponding study ID is opened. This envelope prescribes the type of insert (N2Vac or X3) to be used. The label sticker of the implant that is used is kept on the randomization log in the Investigator site file. The investigator site file is kept at a different location than where the follow-up visits and RSA X-ray analyses are performed.

Follow-up visits are performed at the following time points: prior to discharge, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years after surgery. During these visits x rays are done, any adverse events are monitored (if applicable) and the LEA, EQ-5D and SF-36 questionnaires are completed by the patient. Furthermore standard X-rays, as well as one additional RSA X-ray are taken.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureAssessment of the in vivo wear of the two randomized polyethylene inlay types N2Vac and X3 by means of Roentgen Stereophotogrammetry. It is expected that the X3 group will show significantly less wear after 5 years compared to the conventional N2Vac polyethylene group.
Secondary outcome measuresAssessment of prosthetic migration results after two years of the Triathlon CS Peri-Apatite coated tibial and femoral components by means of Roentgen Stereophotogrammetry. It is expected that due to the superior wear qualities of X3 polyethylene this group will show significantly less migration of the prosthesis components after two-years compared to the components in the N2Vac group.
Overall study start date30/09/2011
Completion date30/06/2019

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants100
Key inclusion criteria1. Patient is able to understand the meaning of the study and is willing to sign the EC approved, study specific Informed Patient Consent Form.
2. Patients with a pre-operative knee score of < 70.
3. Patients scheduled to undergo primary total knee replacement with any of the following indication.
3.1. Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis.
3.2. One or more compartments are involved.
4. Need to obtain pain relief and improve function.
5. Ability and willingness to follow instructions, including control of weight and activity level, and to return for follow-up evaluations.
6. A good nutritional state of the patient.
7. Full skeletal maturity of the patient, patients who are at least 18 years of age.
8. Patients of either sex.
Key exclusion criteria1. The subject is morbidly obese, defined as Body Mass Index (BMI) of > 40.
2. Skeletal immaturity of the patient, patients who are less than 18 years of age.
3. Patient has a flexion contracture of 15° and more.
4. Patient has a varus/valgus contracture of 15° and more.
5. Patients with a pre-operative knee score of >70.
6. The subject has a history of total or unicompartmental reconstruction of the affected joint.
7. The subject will be operated bilaterally.
8. Patients who had a Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) on contralateral and/or ipsilateral side within the last year that is considered to have an unsatisfactory outcome (Patients with contralateral and/or ipsilateral THA > 1 year ago with good outcome can be included in the study).
9. Patients who had a Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) on contralateral side within the last 6 months that is considered to have an unsatisfactory outcome. (Patients with contralateral TKA > 6 months ago with good outcome can be included in the study).
10. The subject has an active or suspected latent infection in or about the knee joint
11. Osteomyelitis
12. Sepsis
13. Patients who will need lower limb joint replacement for another joint within one year.
14. The subject has a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency, which would limit the ability to assess the performance of the device.
15. The subject has a systemic or metabolic disorder leading to progressive bone deterioration.
16. The subject is immunologically suppressed or receiving steroids in excess of normal physiological requirements.
17. The subject‟s bone stock in compromised by disease or infection which cannot provide adequate support and/or fixation to the prosthesis.
18. The subject has had a knee fusion to the affected joint.
19. Female patients planning a pregnancy during the course of the study.
20. The patient is unable or unwilling to sign the Informed Consent specific to this study.
Date of first enrolment30/09/2011
Date of final enrolment01/06/2014

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

Langeland Hospital
Zoetermeer
-
Netherlands

Sponsor information

Stryker European Operations BV (Netherlands)
Industry

Herikerbergweg 110
Amsterdam
1101 CM
Netherlands

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/02nwyam20

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Stryker European Operations BV

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot expected to be made available
Publication and dissemination planTo be confirmed at a later date
IPD sharing planNot provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Basic results 07/04/2020 23/05/2022 No No

Editorial Notes

23/05/2022: ClinicalTrials.gov results added.
14/12/2015: the overall trial end date was changed from 31/03/2019 to 30/06/2019.