Participatory adolescent groups, youth leadership training and livelihood promotion to improve school attendance, dietary diversity and mental health among adolescent girls in rural eastern India

ISRCTN ISRCTN17206016
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17206016
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
25/06/2018
Registration date
27/06/2018
Last edited
19/05/2025
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background to the study
India is home to around 20% of the world’s adolescent girls. Adolescents living in rural, underserved areas face multiple challenges to their wellbeing, with long-term consequences for their health, educational and socio-economic opportunities. The aim of this study is to test whether an intervention involving Community Youth Teams facilitating participatory peer-led adolescent groups, youth leadership training, and livelihood promotion can improve school attendance, dietary diversity and mental health among adolescent girls in rural India.

Who can participate?
Adolescent girls and boys aged 10-19 years living in villages and adjoining hamlets located in rural areas of Jharkhand (eastern India)

What does the study involve?
Participating areas are randomly allocated to receive the community intervention or to a control group. Each intervention area has a Community Youth Team composed of three people: a peer facilitator aged 20-25 called a ‘yuva saathi’, meaning friend of youth chosen from the community, a youth leadership facilitator, and a livelihood promoter. Yuva saathis facilitate monthly participatory groups for adolescent girls and boys. In the first five meetings, they introduce the intervention, discuss social and economic factors that affect adolescents’ health, how to involve vulnerable adolescents in the groups, gender norms and their consequences, and the adolescents’ needs and expectations. These initial meetings are open to all community members, teachers and frontline health workers. After they have been completed, the groups work through four consecutive Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) cycles that cover four themes: education, nutrition, health and violence. Each PLA cycle comprises five to seven meetings and has four phases: (i) identifying problems affecting adolescents in the community (meeting 1); (ii) identifying and deciding on strategies to address these problems (meetings 2-3); (iii) implementing the strategies (meetings 4-6); and (iv) evaluating the process (meeting 7). The second member of the Community Youth Team, who is a youth leadership facilitator, delivers confidence-building activities for adolescents every two months. Activities are open to all girls and boys in the community, and include sports events such as football tournaments, archery, run-a-thon, problem management sessions and nature walks. Finally, both intervention and control areas have livelihood promoters, who are adults recruited for their skills in farming and environmental management. Livelihood promotion activities aim to provide adolescents with practical skills that they can use in later life, improve food security for families, and provide a common benefit to both intervention and control groups. Livelihood promotion activities run every three months, reflect the seasons, are selected in consultation with communities and are family-focused, involving both adolescents and their parents. They include paddy cultivation, multi-cropping, compost-making techniques, tree planting, rain water harvesting and the revival of farmers’ committees and forest groups.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are three main benefits of taking part. Both intervention and control areas receive a livelihood promotion intervention to strengthen adolescents’ practical livelihood-related skills and families’ food security. In both intervention and control areas, girls with severe health problems will benefit from referrals to relevant services. Girls who have symptoms of severe anaemia or are severely acutely malnourished will be referred to the nearest district hospital. Girls with severe mental health problems, or who report experiencing sexual or severe physical violence, will be visited by a trained counselor from Ekjut who will review their case and refer as appropriate to a local health facility or other relevant service. Finally, if the intervention is found to improve adolescents’ dietary diversity, school attendance or mental health, there may be further benefits to control clusters and similar areas if the study influences further support for Community Youth Teams in rural India. There are no known risks of participating for adolescents.

Where is the study run from?
In India, the study is led by the civil society organization Ekjut. In the UK, the study is supported by University College London’s Institute for Global Health and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
December 2015 to August 2020

Who is funding the study?
Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (UK)

Who are the main contact persons?
1. Suchitra Rath
2. Audrey Prost

Contact information

Prof Audrey Prost
Scientific

Institute for Global Health UCL
30 Guilford Street
London
WC1N 1EH
United Kingdom

Ms Suchitra Rath
Scientific

Ekjut
Ward No 17 – 556 B - Potka
Chakradharpur, West Singhbhum, Jharkhand
833102
India

Study information

Study designCluster randomized controlled trial, parallel design
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designCluster randomised trial
Study setting(s)Community
Study typePrevention
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleCommunity Youth Teams facilitating participatory adolescent groups, youth leadership training and livelihood promotion activities to improve school attendance, dietary diversity and mental health among adolescent girls aged 10-19 years in rural eastern India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
Study acronymJIAH (Jharkhand Initiative for Adolescent Health)
Study objectivesCommunity Youth Teams: (i) facilitating participatory adolescent groups; (ii) youth leadership training; and (iii) livelihood promotion meetings, will improve school attendance, dietary diversity and mental health among girls aged 10-19 years in rural Jharkhand (eastern India).
Ethics approval(s)1. University College London Research Ethics Committee, 24/05/2016, ref: 2656/002
2. Ekjut Independent Ethics Committee, 07/05/2016
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedAdolescent health
InterventionThe study has recruited 38 geographical clusters of around 1000 population each, composed of villages and adjoining hamlets located in rural areas of Jharkhand (eastern India). Trial participants are all adolescent girls aged 10-19 years who agree to be interviewed and are living in the 38 study clusters during the baseline and/or endline surveys. Intervention participants are adolescent boys and girls aged 10-19 years within the study area. For financial and logistical reasons, the trial outcomes relate only to girls. However, the trialists decided to include both adolescent boys and girls in the intervention because it could be beneficial to boys, and some problems may be more effectively addressed by engaging with both boys and girls. Participation in intervention activities is voluntary.

Randomisation was conducted in February 2017. 19 clusters were allocated to the intervention arm and 19 to the control arm. Randomisation was stratified according to whether clusters had (i) a secondary school, (ii) an adolescent club and (iii) a population size of 1500 or above. To ensure transparency of the randomisation process, the trialists invited people from the local community to participate. They explained the intervention and the purpose of randomisation to the participants. Clusters were numbered and displayed on the wall. Participants placed a set of identical balls numbered from 1 to 38, corresponding to each of the 38 clusters, in a tombola machine. They operated the machine and sequentially allocated each ball to the intervention and control arms.

Each intervention cluster has a Community Youth Team composed of three people: (1) a peer facilitator aged 20-25 called a ‘yuva saathi’, meaning friend of youth (one girl per cluster and one boy for two clusters) chosen from the community; (2) a youth leadership facilitator (one for 6-7 clusters); (3) and a livelihood promoter (one for 9-10 clusters).

Yuva saathis facilitate monthly participatory groups for adolescent girls and boys. In the first five meetings, they introduce the intervention, discuss social and economic factors that affect adolescents’ health, how to involve vulnerable adolescents in the groups, gender norms and their consequences, and the adolescents’ needs and expectations. These initial meetings are open to all community members, teachers and frontline health workers. After they have been completed, the groups work through four consecutive Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) cycles that cover four themes: education, nutrition, health and violence. Each PLA cycle comprises five to seven meetings and has four phases: (i) identifying problems affecting adolescents in the community (meeting 1); (ii) identifying and deciding on strategies to address these problems (meetings 2-3); (iii) implementing the strategies (meetings 4-6); and (iv) evaluating the process (meeting 7). These themes were selected on the basis of formative research and reflect the broad dimensions of adolescent health and development, as well as the content of the national curriculum for adolescent health (Rashtriya Kishore Swasthya Karyakram, or RKSK).

The trialists' formative research also identified the need for participatory groups to be complemented by engaging in, fun and confidence-building activities. The second member of the Community Youth Team who is a youth leadership facilitator delivers confidence-building activities for adolescents every two months. Activities are open to all girls and boys in the community, and include sports events such as football tournaments, archery, run-a-thon, and problem management sessions and nature walks.

Finally, both intervention and control clusters have livelihood promoters, who are adults recruited for their skills in farming and environmental management. Livelihood promotion activities aim to provide adolescents with practical skills that they can use in later life, improve food security for families, and provide a common benefit to both intervention and control arms. Livelihood promotion activities run every three months, reflect the seasons, are selected in consultation with communities and are family-focused, involving both adolescents and their parents. They include paddy cultivation, multi-cropping, compost-making techniques, tree planting, rain water harvesting and the revival of farmer’s committees and forest groups.

The total duration of the intervention is 36 months. There is no follow-up period after the intervention ends.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureAssessed during the endline survey:
1. Mean dietary diversity score among adolescent girls
2. Mean score on the Brief Problem Monitor – Youth
3. % of adolescent girls attending school
Secondary outcome measuresAssessed during the endline survey:
1. % of girls making decisions independently and with others about the food they eat including how much they eat and what types of food they eat
2. Mean score on gender role attitudes index
3. % of girls making decisions independently and with others about friends, spending money and purchases
4. Mean score on the Schwarzer General Self-Efficacy Scale
5. Mean score on the Child and Youth Resilience Measure 11-item version (CYRM-Brief)
6. % of girls who report experiencing emotional violence in the past 12 months
7. % of girls who report experiencing physical violence in the past 12 months
8. % of girls who report intervening to reduce emotional violence against their peers in the past 12 months
9. % of girls who report intervening to reduce physical violence against their peers in the past 12 months
10. % of girls who report being absent from school in the past two weeks
11. % of girls accessing at least one school-related entitlement (cash, bicycles, books, midday meal scheme)
12. % of girls who drank alcohol in the past month
Overall study start date01/12/2015
Completion date31/08/2020

Eligibility

Participant type(s)All
Age groupMixed
Lower age limit10 Years
Upper age limit19 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsBetween 6000-7000 adolescent girls aged 10-19 years (3324 in baseline – already completed, and between 3000-4000 estimated at endline)
Total final enrolment4802
Key inclusion criteriaEligibility for the baseline and endline survey:
Adolescent girls aged 10-19 years who are living in the study area and agree to be interviewed are eligible to participate in the baseline and endline surveys. Married and unmarried girls will be included in the surveys, as well as in school and out of school girls, and girls living in the same household. Girls will be excluded if they are unavailable for interview at the time of the survey because they have either migrated permanently or migrated temporarily and are not available following at least three repeat visits.

Eligibility to receive the intervention:
Intervention activities are open to all adolescent girls and boys aged 10-19 years living in the study area. This includes adolescents who are married or unmarried and who are in-school or out-of-school. It also includes adolescents who move into or out of the study area during the study. Adolescents themselves determine the extent to which they engage in the intervention activities and therefore exposure will vary at an individual level.
Key exclusion criteriaFor baseline and endline surveys:
Girls who are unavailable for interview at the time of the survey because they have migrated permanently or migrated temporarily and are not available following repeat visits.

For the intervention:
No adolescent or other community members are excluded from intervention activities.
Date of first enrolment01/06/2016
Date of final enrolment30/06/2020

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • India

Study participating centre

Ekjut
Ward No 17 – 556 B - Potka
Chakradharpur, West Singhbhum
Jharkhand
833102
India

Sponsor information

Ekjut
Other

Ward No 17 – 556 B - Potka
Chakradharpur, West Singhbhum, Jharkhand
833102
India

Website http://www.ekjutindia.org/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01q3by234
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
University/education

Department of Global Health and Development
15-17 Tavistock Place
London
WC1H 9SH
England
United Kingdom

Website https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Children's Investment Fund Foundation
Private sector organisation / Trusts, charities, foundations (both public and private)
Alternative name(s)
CIFF
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date01/08/2021
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryOther
Publication and dissemination planThe study protocol and statistical analysis plan will be published and available online. The trialists plan to publish the trial results in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal in August 2021.
IPD sharing planThe anonymised dataset analysed during the current study will be made available as a .csv file with the main results publication, along with a text file containing Stata code to reproduce the analyses.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 08/01/2020 09/12/2020 Yes No
Results article 27/12/2022 10/01/2023 Yes No

Editorial Notes

19/05/2025: The recruitment start date was changed from 01/03/2016 to 01/06/2016.
07/06/2023: Internal review.
10/01/2023: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.
09/12/2020: Publication reference added.
04/09/2019: The scientific contact details have been updated.