Evaluating a risk factor checklist and training video for GPs as a means of reducing practice variation in referral for glue ear.

ISRCTN ISRCTN17594119
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17594119
Protocol serial number PSI B-6
Sponsor Record Provided by the NHS R&D 'Time-Limited' National Programme Register - Department of Health (UK)
Funder NHS Primary and Secondary Care Interface National Research and Development Programme (UK)
Submission date
23/01/2004
Registration date
23/01/2004
Last edited
21/12/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Ear, Nose and Throat
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Kath Bennett
Scientific

Research Fellow in Bio-epidemiology at the CRC Paediatric and Familial Cancer Research Group
Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital
Stancliffe
Hospital Road
Manchester
M27 4HA
United Kingdom

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study objectivesTo evaluate the effect of a risk factor checklist and educational training video on glue ear for general practitioners in reducing practice variation and improving the appropriateness of referral to ENT.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedGlue ear; otitis media
InterventionEach practice was randomised to one of the following groups:
1. Control
2. Video only
3. Checklist only
4. Video and checklist.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

Overall mean GP and practice referral rates for OME or related conditions remained stable, simplifying the comparisons related to intervention. There was no reduction in variability amongst practices receiving any intervention, compared with practices receiving none. In those receiving both the video and checklist compared with those receiving only one or no intervention, there was a significant improvement in the quality of referrals, as given by more referrals having bilateral HL >20 dB when sent at ENT (ANCOVA for linear trend assuming 0, 1, 2 interventions and adjusting for the period the child waited to be seen at ENT; p = 0.010). No difference was found between the intervention and non-intervention groups in parent satisfaction scores. However, irrespective of intervention group, parents of children who received more information from their GP about glue ear had higher satisfaction scores than those that did not (p = 0.022). Disseminating information on glue ear to GPs in a multi-channel approach can improve the quality of referrals to ENT but appears to make little impact on the parent¿s satisfaction with the information provided by their GP. Much of the variation in GP glue ear referrals and ENT consultants¿ VT insertion rates is still not accounted for, reducing the ability to produce suggestions on how best to compress it. This study provides a worthwhile basis for further large-scale work using such interventions, particularly when used in combination with one another, provided the appropriate outcome measures are used including the patient¿s perspective.

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Not provided at time of registration

Completion date01/05/1999

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupOther
SexAll
Target sample size at registration50
Key inclusion criteriaFifty general practices from Trent Region and the West of Scotland were recruited into a cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Key exclusion criteriaDoes not match inclusion criteria
Date of first enrolment01/02/1997
Date of final enrolment01/05/1999

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Research Fellow in Bio-epidemiology at the CRC Paediatric and Familial Cancer Research Group
Manchester
M27 4HA
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/07/2001 Yes No