The efficacy of different local anaesthetic solutions/techniques in producing painless sensation in patients suffering 'hot' mandibular tooth pulps

ISRCTN ISRCTN18143187
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN18143187
Secondary identifying numbers 05/Q0906/21
Submission date
13/09/2005
Registration date
11/11/2005
Last edited
28/10/2010
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Oral Health
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr John Martin Whitworth
Scientific

School of Dental Sciences
Newcastle University
Newcastle
NE2 4BW
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)191 222 78 25
Email j.m.whitworth@ncl.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study objectivesThe null hypothesis: Supplementary repeat inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), local infiltration, intraligamentary injection and intraosseous injection after failed IANB are equally effective and pain free in securing anaesthesia for the pulps of irreversibly pulpitic mandibular teeth.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedIrreversible pulpitis teeth
InterventionThe power calculation revealed that a sample size using 50 volunteer patients in each supplementary technique (four arms) will have 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.57 in a continuous outcome measure assuming a significance level of 5%. When an initial inferior alveolar nerve block injection (IANB) fails to secure pulp anaesthesia, patients will be randomised to receive one of four supplementary injections (four arms), namely:
1. Repeat IANB with 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine
2. Intraligamentary injection with 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine
3. Intraosseous injection with 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine
4. Local infiltration with 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureTo evaluate the effectiveness of initial IANB in profoundly anaesthetising irreversibly pulpitic and adjacent non-pulpitic.
Secondary outcome measuresTo evaluate the effect of supplementary local anaesthetic techniques after failure of pulp anaesthesia by IANB in patients suffering mandibular irreversible pulpitis.
Overall study start date27/06/2005
Completion date30/06/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants500
Key inclusion criteria1. Patients of 16 years of age and over
2. Any mandibular tooth with irreversible pulpitis and an asymptomatic vital tooth on the opposite site of the arch to act as an internal control of pulp tester function
Key exclusion criteria1. Patients with allergies or sensitivities to lidocaine/articaine or other ingredients in the anaesthetic solution
2. Patients who are unable to provide informed consent
3. Relevant medical history, which may compromise the welfare of the patient (e.g. unstable angina) or which may compromise data collection (e.g. facial paraesthesia)
Date of first enrolment27/06/2005
Date of final enrolment30/06/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

School of Dental Sciences
Newcastle
NE2 4BW
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Research and Development Department
Room 3.037
Royal Victoria Infirmary
Queen Victoria Road
Newcastle Upon Tyne
NE1 4LP
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)191 232 5131
Email jane.varey@nuth.northy.nhs.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/05p40t847

Funders

Funder type

Government

Student fees

No information available

Support services from NHS

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/04/2006 Yes No