Efficacy and safety of XM22 compared to pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN18217390 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN18217390 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | XM22-03 |
- Submission date
- 22/04/2010
- Registration date
- 10/06/2010
- Last edited
- 16/01/2019
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Dr Peter Bias
Scientific
Scientific
Merckle GmbH
A Member of the ratiopharm Group
Clinical Research
Graf-Arco-Straße 3
Ulm
89075
Germany
Study information
| Study design | Multinational multicentre randomised double blind active controlled phase III study |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Interventional |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study setting(s) | Hospital |
| Study type | Treatment |
| Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet |
| Scientific title | Efficacy and safety of XM22 compared to pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. A multinational, multicentre, randomised, double-blind controlled study |
| Study objectives | Demonstration of non-inferiority of XM22 versus pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer during the first cycle of chemotherapy with respect to the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) |
| Ethics approval(s) | At each study centre, the protocol (dated 29 September 2009) and informed consent form for this study were reviewed and approved by Independent Ethic Committees before inclusion of patients. Amendments to the protocol will be reviewed and approved in the same manner before being implemented. |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Breast cancer patients with chemotherapy induced neutropenia |
| Intervention | XM22: 1 syringe 6 mg per cycle (cycles 1-4) Pegfilgrastim: 1 syringe 6 mg per cycle (cycles 1-4) The duration of the study will be 12 weeks. The duration of follow up will be 360 days. |
| Intervention type | Drug |
| Pharmaceutical study type(s) | |
| Phase | Phase III |
| Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s) | XM22, pegfilgrastim |
| Primary outcome measure | Duration of severe neutropenia in cycle 1, defined as grade 4 neutropenia with an ANC <0.5 x 10*9/L |
| Secondary outcome measures | 1. Incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) by cycle and across all cycles (FN defined as body temperature of >38.5°C for at least one hour, measured orally with a certified standard device, and ANC <0.5 x 10*9/L, including cases of neutropenic sepsis or neutropenic serious or life-threatening infection) 2. Time in hospital and time in intensive care unit due to FN or connected infections 3. Incidence of treatment with i.v. antibiotics due to FN or connected infections 4. DSN in cycles 2, 3, and 4 5. Incidence of severe neutropenia, defined as grade 4 neutropenia with an ANC <0.5 x 10*9/L in cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4 6. Duration and incidence of very severe neutropenia, defined as ANC <0.1 x 10*9/L in cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4 7. Depth of ANC nadir in cycles 1, 2, 3, and 4 8. Time to ANC nadir in cycles 1, 2, 3, and 4 9. Time to ANC recovery in cycles 1, 2, 3, and 4 10. Percentage of actually delivered vs. scheduled cumulative chemotherapy dose 11. Proportion of patients with chemotherapy doses reduced, omitted, or delayed 12. Number of days of delay of chemotherapy 13. Overall quality of life as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3) and the EORTC QLQ-BR23 |
| Overall study start date | 01/05/2010 |
| Completion date | 01/03/2012 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | Both |
| Target number of participants | 200 (100 per treatment group) |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Provide signed and dated written informed consent 2. Men and women aged ≥18 years 3. The patient must be able to understand and follow instructions and must be able to participate in the study for the entire period 4. Breast cancer high risk stage II, III or IV according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification 5. Patients planned and eligible to receive 4 cycles of treatment with docetaxel/doxorubicin as routine chemotherapy for their breast cancer disease 6. Chemotherapy naïve 7. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2 8. Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) ≥1.5 x 10*9/L 9. Platelet count ≥100 x 10*9/L 10. Adequate cardiac function (including left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% as assessed by echocardiography or equivalent method within 4 weeks prior to randomisation) 11. Adequate hepatic function, i.e. ALT and AST <2.5 x ULN, alkaline phosphatase <5 x ULN, bilirubin <ULN 12. Adequate renal function, i.e. creatinine <1.5 x ULN |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Participation in a clinical trial within 30 days before randomisation. 2. Previous exposure to filgrastim, pegfilgrastim or lenograstim or other G-CSFs in clinical development less than 6 months before randomisation. 3. Known hypersensitivity to docetaxel or doxorubicin, filgrastim, pegfilgrastim or lenograstim. 4. Underlying neuropathy of grade 2 or higher. 5. Treatment with systemically active antibiotics within 72 hours before chemotherapy. 6. Treatment with lithium at inclusion or planned during the entire study. 7. Chronic use of oral corticosteroids. 8. Prior radiation therapy or tumour surgery within 4 weeks before randomisation. 9. Prior bone marrow or stem cell transplantation. 10. Prior malignancy within the previous 5 years other than basal cell or squamous cell carcinomas or in situ carcinoma of the cervix. 11. Any illness or condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect the safety of the patient or the evaluation of any study endpoint. 12. Pregnant or nursing women. Women of child-bearing potential who do not agree to use a highly effective method of birth control during the entire duration of the study. Highly effective methods of birth control are defined as those which result in a low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, hormonal IUDs, sexual abstinence or vasectomised partner. Female patients will be considered to be of child-bearing potential unless surgically sterilised by hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or post-menopausal for at least two years (Postmenopausal is defined as the time after which a woman has experienced twelve consecutive months of amenorrhea without a period). |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/05/2010 |
| Date of final enrolment | 01/03/2012 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Bulgaria
- Germany
- Russian Federation
- Ukraine
Study participating centre
Merckle GmbH
Ulm
89075
Germany
89075
Germany
Sponsor information
BioGeneriX AG (Germany)
Industry
Industry
High-Tech-Park Neckarau
Janderstraße 3
Mannheim
68199
Germany
| Website | http://www.biogenerix.com |
|---|---|
"ROR" |
https://ror.org/03xa4xh46 |
Funders
Funder type
Industry
BioGeneriX AG (Germany)
No information available
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 14/08/2013 | Yes | No |
Editorial Notes
16/01/2019: Publication reference added.
