Doxycycline Plus Streptomycin Versus Ciprofloxacin Plus Rifampicin in Spinal Brucellosis

ISRCTN ISRCTN31053647
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN31053647
Secondary identifying numbers 04/131
Submission date
22/03/2006
Registration date
29/03/2006
Last edited
13/10/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Emine Alp
Scientific

Department of Infectious Disease
Erciyes University Medical School
Kayseri
38039
Türkiye

Email ealp@erciyes.edu.tr

Study information

Study designAn open, controlled and non-randomized trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designNon randomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study objectivesCiprofloxacin plus rifampicin may be an alternative treatment regimen to doxycycline plus streptomycin in the treatment of spinal brucellosis
Ethics approval(s)Yes, Approved by the Ethical Committee of Erciyes University, approval date: 4/05/2001, reference number: 04/131
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedBrucellosis is an infectious disease affecting multiple systems including vertebrae
InterventionTo compare the efficacy, adverse drug reactions, complications and cost of ciprofloxacin plus rifampicin versus doxycycline plus streptomycin in the treatment of spinal brucellosis
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Doxycycline, streptomycin, ciprofloxacin, rifampicin
Primary outcome measure1. Clinical efficacy of ciprofloxacin plus rifampicin in spinal brucellosis
2. The prevalence of relapses
Secondary outcome measuresThe cost of the two regimens
Overall study start date01/01/2002
Completion date31/12/2004

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants31 patients
Key inclusion criteriaThe patients diagnosed with spinal brucellosis between January 2002 to December 2004 were enrolled into two study groups consecutively
Key exclusion criteria1. Age less than 16 years
2. Pregnancy
3. Neurobrucellosis
4. Previous history of brucellosis and antimicrobial therapy and discontinuation of the therapy for any reason (allergy to any of the drugs, death, adverse reactions)
Date of first enrolment01/01/2002
Date of final enrolment31/12/2004

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Türkiye

Study participating centre

Department of Infectious Disease
Kayseri
38039
Türkiye

Sponsor information

Erciyes University Medical School (Turkey)
University/education

Department of Infectious Disease
Erciyes University Medical School
Kayseri
38039
Türkiye

Email ealp@erciyes.edu.tr
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/047g8vk19

Funders

Funder type

University/education

The study was supported by Infectious Disease Clinic, Erciyes University Medical School (Turkey)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 11/04/2006 Yes No