Full thickness macular hole and Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM) peeling Study: a randomised comparison of macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling

ISRCTN ISRCTN33175422
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN33175422
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00286507
Secondary identifying numbers HS028 RGC1462
Submission date
02/08/2005
Registration date
21/09/2005
Last edited
17/08/2018
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Eye Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Dr Noemi Lois
Scientific

Eye Clinic, Foresterhill
Aberdeen
AB25 2ZN
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1224 553217
Email noemilois@aol.com

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Patient information can be found at: https://medserv.abdn.ac.uk/films/documents/pdf/patientInformationSmPdf.pdf
Scientific titleFull thickness macular hole and Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM) peeling Study: a randomised comparison of macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling
Study acronymFILMS
Study objectivesThe principal research question is whether peeling the internal limiting membrane of the retina improves the vision of patients undergoing macular hole surgery. Secondary questions are whether peeling the internal limiting membrane of the retina improves the anatomical outcome of macular hole surgery and, subsequently, the quality of life of patients with macular holes. Whether internal limiting membrane peeling is cost-effective will also be considered.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedFull-thickness macular holes in the centre of the retina
InterventionParticipants will undergo one of the two possible macular hole surgeries:
1. Surgery without ILM peeling
2. Surgery with ILM peeling
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureDistance visual acuity at 6 months post surgery.
Secondary outcome measuresDistance visual acuity at 3 months, near visual acuity at 3 and 6 months, contrast sensitivity at 6 months, reading speed at 6 months, health related quality of life, costs to the health service and the participant, incremental costs per QALY and adverse events.
Overall study start date01/06/2005
Completion date31/05/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants150
Key inclusion criteriaPatients with idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) stages 2-3 of equal to or less than 18 months duration and with vision equal to or worse than 20/40 in the study eye.
Key exclusion criteriaPatients with macular holes of stage 1 or 4 or with a hole of greater than 18 months duration will be excluded. If the FTMH is related to high myopia or trauma or there are other causes of decreased vision (e.g. corneal scarring, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma if central and/or paracentral absolute visual field defects are present) will also be excluded. Patients who are unable to understand English or give informed consent to be excluded.
Date of first enrolment01/06/2005
Date of final enrolment31/05/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Eye Clinic, Foresterhill
Aberdeen
AB25 2ZN
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Aberdeen (UK)
University/education

Kings College
Aberdeen
AB24 3FX
Scotland
United Kingdom

Website http://www.abdn.ac.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/016476m91

Funders

Funder type

Government

Chief Scientist Office, Health Department, Scottish Executive (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 03/11/2008 Yes No
Results article results 01/03/2011 Yes No

Editorial Notes

17/08/2018: Publication reference added.