Knowledge translation for dementia: Comparing a blended learning approach with "classical" vocational training among general practitioners

ISRCTN ISRCTN36550981
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN36550981
Protocol serial number 01GK0512
Sponsor Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) / German Aerospace Center (DLR) (Germany)
Funder Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)/German Aerospace Center (DLR) (ref. number: 01GK0512)
Submission date
22/08/2006
Registration date
11/09/2006
Last edited
11/07/2019
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Horst Christian Vollmar
Scientific

Witten/Herdecke University
Faculty of Medicine
Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50
Witten
58448
Germany

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designOpen, cluster randomised controlled trial (randomisation on the level of general practitioners' quality circles)
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific titleKnowledge translation for dementia: a cluster randomised trial to compare a blended learning approach with vocational training in quality circles of general practitioners
Study acronymWIDA (Wissensvermittlung Demenz in der Allgemeinmedizin)
Study objectivesOutcomes with respect to knowledge gain differ in Quality Circles (QC) with a blended learning approach versus QC with vocational training.

As of 28/07/09 this trial was updated to include a seperate public and scientific title.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics committee of Witten/Herdecke University (reference number: 42/2006), date of approval: 20/06/2006 (first amendment: 20/07/2006)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedDementia
InterventionScientific researchers of Witten/Herdecke University offer a dementia education programme to moderators of QCs particular with GPs. Participating GPs in the intervention group were motivated to do some home study on the internet (t0). Online case-based learning and e-learning test modules for Continuing Medical Education (CME) in dementia were made available. At the next date of the QC the GPs received a structured discussion about the content of the dementia learning modules (t1). Between t0 and t1 the participants got a reminder.

The control group received usual vocational training followed by a structured discussion about dementia.

Both groups, the GPs in the intervention and in the control group, received written information on the "state-of-the-art" diagnosis and therapy of patients with dementia (short and comprehensive version of an evidence-based dementia guideline for GPs).
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

At six weeks (+/- three weeks) (t1): knowledge gain measured by a multiple choice questionnaire with 20 questions about the diagnosis and therapy of dementia (difference from baseline at t0 to t1)

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

At six weeks (+/- three weeks) (t1):
1. Evaluation of the education program by questionnaire
2. Questionnaire about utilisation and efficiency of educational media

At six months (+/- three weeks) (t2):
1. Knowledge about dementia (same questionnaire as at t0 and t1)
2. By 15% of participants: behaviour measured by four parameters (utilisation of psychometric tests, International Classification of Diseases (ICD) -codes for dementia, dementia drug prescribing, coordination of dementia care) extracted from the primary care computer systems
3. By 15% of participants: quality interviews focusing on strategies of lifelong learning as well as care of patients with dementia

Completion date30/06/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexAll
Target sample size at registration174
Total final enrolment166
Key inclusion criteriaOn the level of quality circles (QC):
1. QC or ambulatory practice networks with an telephone agreement of the moderator and particular with General Practitioners (GPs)
2. GPs who participated in both sequential dates of the quality circles
3. GPs with internet access (home or practice)
Key exclusion criteriaParticipation in another QC which participates in the study
Date of first enrolment01/07/2005
Date of final enrolment30/06/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Germany

Study participating centre

Witten/Herdecke University
Witten
58448
Germany

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 04/01/2010 11/07/2019 Yes No
Protocol article protocol 22/06/2007 Yes No

Editorial Notes

11/07/2019: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.