National breast cancer study of Epirubicin plus CMF versus classical CMF Adjuvant Therapy

ISRCTN ISRCTN42625759
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN42625759
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00003577
Secondary identifying numbers BR3014
Submission date
01/07/2001
Registration date
01/07/2001
Last edited
25/01/2019
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk/trials/national-breast-cancer-study-of-epirubicin-as-adjuvant-therapy

Contact information

Dr Sarah Bowden
Scientific

CR UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Cancer Studies, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)121 414 4371
Email BTT@bham.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleNational breast cancer study of Epirubicin plus CMF versus classical CMF Adjuvant Therapy
Study acronymNEAT
Study objectivesIn women with early breast cancer, adjuvant combination chemotherapy which schedules 4 cycles of epirubicin, followed by 4 cycles of classical CMF, is significantly superior to classical CMF for 6 cycles, in terms of disease-free and overall survival.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedBreast
Intervention1. Group A: Chemotherapy, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) repeated every 3 weeks for six cycles.
2. Group B: Chemotherapy, epirubicin repeated every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by CMF repeated every 3 weeks for four cycles.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhasePhase III
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Epirubicin plus CMF versus classical CMF Adjuvant Therapy
Primary outcome measure1. 5 year disease-free survival
2. 5 year overall survival
Secondary outcome measures1. Acute toxicity comparison between the two study arms
2. Quality of life and limited health economic comparisons between the two study arms, in a subset of 300 patients from designated centres
Overall study start date30/04/1996
Completion date31/07/2001

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target number of participantsTarget: 2000 patients. Recruited: 2028
Key inclusion criteria1. Histological diagnosis of invasive breast cancer
2. Clinically early stage disease
3. Definitive surgery (either wide local excision or mastectomy) to the breast with complete excision of tumour
4. In the opinion of the clinician there is a definite indication for adjuvant chemotherapy, or the patient has been randomised to receive chemotherapy in the ABC study
5. Fit to receive chemotherapy in either of the two arms
6. No previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy
7. Adequate renal, hepatic and bone marrow function
8. Randomisation within 6 weeks of surgery, ideally within 1 month
9. No previous malignancy except, basal cell carcinoma or in situ carcinoma of the cervix
Key exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Date of first enrolment30/04/1996
Date of final enrolment31/07/2001

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

CR UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Cancer Studies, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Birmingham (UK)
University/education

RES, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)121 414 7618
Email abc@123.com
Website http://www.bham.ac.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03angcq70

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Cancer Research UK
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
Alternative name(s)
CR_UK, Cancer Research UK - London, CRUK
Location
United Kingdom
Pharmacia and Upjohn

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Plain English results No Yes
Results article results 02/11/2006 Yes No
Results article results 21/10/2008 25/01/2019 Yes No

Editorial Notes

25/01/2019: Publication reference added
22/10/2018: Cancer Research UK lay results summary link added to Results (plain English)