Laparoscopic treatment for female urinary incontinence
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN44339585 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN44339585 |
| Protocol serial number | F0004 |
| Sponsor | NHS R&D Regional Programme Register - Department of Health (UK) |
| Funder | NHS Executive Northern and Yorkshire (UK) |
- Submission date
- 23/01/2004
- Registration date
- 23/01/2004
- Last edited
- 24/10/2019
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Dr Karen Boyd
Scientific
Scientific
Yorkshire Health
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Belmont Grove
Leeds
LS2 9NS
United Kingdom
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Scientific title | Laparoscopic treatment for female urinary incontinence |
| Study objectives | A Colposuspension procedure is one of the most effective operations undertaken to cure female urinary incontinence. Some gynaecologists believe that a laparoscopically performed Colposuspension may be superior to traditional open Colposuspension in terms of recovery time and cost effectiveness. However, there has never been a formal evaluation of the new procedure and the additional equipment costs and additional operative time required for a laparoscopic approach have never been justified. We plan to assess the value of laparoscopic Colposuspension in a prospective randomised controlled trial. We also aim to assess the value of day ward post-operative care in of catheterised patients in a randomised controlled trial since the benefits of shorter recovery time for the laparoscopic procedure would have little effect if patients were still required to stay in hospital catheterised until normal voiding was resumed. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Incontinence |
| Intervention | Laparoscopically performed Colposuspension vs. open Colposuspension procedure |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
1. Assessment of outpatient or day ward post-operative care will include |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
Not provided at time of registration |
| Completion date | 28/02/1996 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Sex | Female |
| Key inclusion criteria | Women with urinary incontinence |
| Key exclusion criteria | Does not match inclusion criteria |
| Date of first enrolment | 03/01/1994 |
| Date of final enrolment | 28/02/1996 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
Study participating centre
Yorkshire Health
Leeds
LS2 9NS
United Kingdom
LS2 9NS
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Editorial Notes
24/10/2019: No publications found. All search options exhausted.