Comparative evaluation of immunogenicity and reactogenicity of monovalent type 2 and 3 oral poliovirus vaccines (mOPV 2 and mOPV3) versus trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (tOPV), and bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV) versus monovalent types 1 and 3 oral poliovirus vaccines, respectively: a randomised double-blind trial

ISRCTN ISRCTN64725429
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN64725429
Secondary identifying numbers RPC273
Submission date
26/11/2008
Registration date
26/11/2008
Last edited
23/08/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Roland Sutter
Scientific

World Health Organization
20 Avenue Appia
Geneva
CH-1211
Switzerland

Phone +41 (0)22 791 4682
Email sutterr@who.int

Study information

Study designRandomised double-blind clinical trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific title
Study objectivesTo determine if one or two doses of mOPV2 or mOPV3 induces significantly higher levels of seroconversion against poliovirus types 2 or 3, respectively, than does one or two doses of tOPV to these Sabin strains and to determine if one or two doses of bOPV induces similar seroconversion to types 1 and 3, respectively, compared to one or two doses of mOPV1 or mOPV3. Additionally, at one site (Indore), to determine if one or two doses of mOPV2 or mOPV3 significantly reduces excretion of poliovirus types 2 or 3, respectively than does one or two doses of tOPV and to determine if one or two doses of bOPV significantly reduces excretion of poliovirus type 1 and type 3 than does one or two doses of tOPV.
Ethics approval(s)1. MGM Medical College gave approval on the 7th June 2008 (ref: PBL/CR/0042008/CT)
2. The Drug Controller General of India gave approval on the 11th June 2008 (ref: PBL/CR/0042008/CT)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPoliomyelitis
Intervention1. Control: standard trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (tOPV) - one or two doses
2. Intervention group one: monovalent type 1 oral poliovirus vaccine (mOPV1) - one or two doses
3. Intervention group two: monovalent type 2 oral poliovirus vaccine (mOPV2) - one or two doses
4. Intervention group three: monovalent type 3 oral poliovirus vaccine (mOPV3) - one or two doses
5. Intervention group four: bivalent type 1 and 3 oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV) - one or two doses

Contact details of Principal Investigator:
Dr T Jacob John
439 Civil Supplies Godown Lane
Kamalakshipuram
Vellore 632 002
India
Tel: +91 (0)416 226 7364
Email: vlr_tjjohn@sancharnet.in
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Oral poliovirus vaccines
Primary outcome measureSeroconversion 30 days after a single dose of mOPV2 or mOPV3 compared to tOPV or seroconversion following a single dose of bOPV compared to mOPV1.
Secondary outcome measures1. Seroconversion of two doses of mOPV2 or mOPV3 compared to tOPV
2. Seroconversion of one or two doses of bOPV compared to mOPV1 or mOPV3
3. Prevalence of excretion of poliovirus serotypes 1, 2, and 3 at 7, 30, 37, and 60 days (at Indore site only)
Overall study start date13/08/2008
Completion date13/10/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNeonate
SexBoth
Target number of participants900
Key inclusion criteria1. Healthy newborns (either sex) (greater than or equal to 2.50 kg birth weight, apgar score at 5 min greater than or equal to 9) at the study sites (large maternity hospitals)
2. Residing within a relatively short and easily accessible distance (less than 30 km)
3. Not planning to travel away during entire the study period (birth - 2 months)
Key exclusion criteria1. Newborns requiring hospitalisation
2. Birth weight below 2.50 kg
3. Apgar score at 5 min less than 9
4. Residence greater than 30 km from study site
5. Families expecting to be absent during the 60-day study period
6. A diagnosis or suspicion of immunodeficiency disorder (either in the participant or in a member of the immediate family) will render the newborn ineligible for the study
Date of first enrolment13/08/2008
Date of final enrolment13/10/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • India
  • Switzerland

Study participating centre

World Health Organization
Geneva
CH-1211
Switzerland

Sponsor information

Panacea Biotec Limited (India)
Industry

B-1 Extn/G-3
Mohan Co-op. Indl. Estate
Mathura Road
New Delhi
110044
India

Phone +91 (0)11 4167 8000/9000
Email aranichatterjee@panaceabiotec.com
Website http://www.panacea-biotec.com/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01ew11x49

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Panacea Biotec Limited (India)

No information available

World Health Organization (WHO) (Switzerland)
Private sector organisation / International organizations
Alternative name(s)
منظمة الصحة العالمية, 世界卫生组织, Всемирная организация здравоохранения, Organisation mondiale de la Santé, Organización Mundial de la Salud, WHO, 世卫组织, ВОЗ, OMS
Location
Switzerland

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 13/11/2010 Yes No