Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
Previous research indicates that exercising on different surfaces with varying demands for the body and mind might beneficially affect neuromuscular performance and reduce fall risk factors in elderly, middle-aged, or young persons. To this end, the impact of running on unpredictable dirt trails vs. paved road has not yet been compared. It could be possible that trail running leads to stronger adaptations in fall prevention musculature. The aim of this study is to examine if trail running has beneficial improvements in muscle performance, therefore reducing injuries or falls.
Who can participate?
Healthy adults aged 18 to 59 who are currently living a sedentary lifestyle.
What does the study involve?
All participants join a running program for a period of 8 weeks, 3-5 times a week for around 25-45 minutes. Participants re randomly allocated to one of two groups. Those in the first group perform the running program on the outdoor trail. Those in the second group perform the running program on the road. Perceived exertion levels are recorded by each participant in an individually prepared training logbook along with other information, such as duration and mileage of the run, and how they felt after each workout. Pre- and posttraining program testing sessions are scheduled before and after the program to evaluate participants static and dynamic balance, gait analysis, agility, leg strength, and endurance capacity.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants may benefit from being encouraged to exercise more and having the confidence to hike, walk or run outside and maintain a healthy lifestyle. Participants also are given insights on their physical fitness and their balance, strength, gait and agility performance. Exercise can cause discomforts and risks such as fatigue, nausea, dizziness, lightheadedness, shortness of breath, muscle soreness, injuries such as pulled and torn muscles, heart arrhythmias and heart attacks. These risks are very unlikely at the exercise intensities applied in this study.
Where is the study run from?
Northern Michigan University (USA)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
July 2016 to December 2016
Who is funding the study?
Investigator initiated and funded (Switzerland)
Who is the main contact?
Marisa Heckendorn (Scientific)
Ms Marisa Heckendorn
University of Basel
Prof Lars Donath
German Sport University Cologne
Department of Intervention Research in Exercise Training
Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6
Prof Scott Drum
Northern Michigan University
School of Health and Human Performance
Office 201F PEIF
1401 Presque Isle Avenue
United States of America
The effects of an 8-week trail versus road running program on neuromuscular performance parameters in healthy middle-aged adults: A two-armed randomized controlled pilot study
Trail running causes more beneficial improvements in neuromuscular performance opposed to road running and thereby helps reduce falls and fall-related injuries. These assumptions are based on the different characteristics of surface type between conditions. Trail running tends to invoke higher challenges for the neuromuscular system, especially regarding coordination, proprioception, and muscle activation.
Northern Michigan University (NMU) Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Research Involving Human Subjects, 02/09/2016, ref: #HS16-786
interventional simple randomization via random number generator, anonymous, to either trail running intervention or road running control group; single-centre
Primary study design
Secondary study design
Randomised controlled trial
Patient information sheet
Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet’
Falls and fall-related injury due to physical inactivity and accelerated aging-induced functional decrements across all bodily systems, which also compromise the performance of activities of daily living (ADL)
All participants are asked to answer the International Physical Activity Questionnaire – Short Form (IPAQ-SF), the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q&YOU), and the American College of Sports and Medicine (ACSM) Risk Stratification to assess their current health and activity levels.
Participants are anonymously assigned by the researcher by simple randomization using a random number generator to either TRAIL (n=20) or ROAD (n=19) and instructed with the same endurance exercise program. Those in the TRAIL group run on a trail. Those in the ROAD group run on a road. Both groups perform a continuous, progressive running program over a period of 8 weeks, 3-5 times a week for 25 - 45 minutes with and without walk breaks. Perceived exertion levels are recorded by each participant in an individually prepared training logbook along with other information, such as duration and mileage of the run, and how they felt after each workout. Pre- and
posttraining program testing sessions are scheduled with the examiner. Therefore, participants reported to the Exercise Science Laboratory of the Northern Michigan University campus, once before and once after the intervention for about 90 minutes each session. Testing was performed for static and dynamic balance, gait analysis, agility, leg strength, and endurance capacity.
The programme consists of eight weeks of gradually increasing running workouts with a total amount of 29 training sessions. Thereof, an adherence rate of a minimum of 80% (24 runs) is required. Exercise training started for each participant after the pretest in September 2016 and was done individually on self-selected outdoor trails and roads at a perceived exertion of 3-4 on Borg CR-10.
Participants are contacted at least once a week by the researcher for an update/feedback on their progress in and experience with the training program. Optional running meetings are held twice a week for each group (total 4 meetings) with me and additional individual coaching meetings were schedule anytime upon request.
After post testing, a final and optional 5km fun event is organised.
The running logs of all participants are collected during the posttesting meeting. All participants received a summary of their results/outcomes from pre- to post testing. Additionally, participants are given the contact information of the study PI case of questions, concerns, or problems post-intervention.
Primary outcome measures
All measurements were conducted once for each participant at baseline and a second time within 1 week after completion of the 8-week intervention/training program.
1. Static balance was measured using the BESS (Balance Error Scoring System) test
2. Dynamic balance was measured using the Y-balance test
3. Gait was measured using the Rehagait gait analysis device during level walking at self-selected walking-speeds under single and dual task conditions
4. Agility was measured using the Agility T-Test
5. Strength was measured using the BIODEX Multijoint System 4 Pro for dominant isokinetic leg strength, applying the knee and ankle device (knee extension/flexion, ankle plantar/dorsi flexion)
Secondary outcome measures
Predicated maximal oxygen consumption is measured using the Parvo Medics True One 2400 metabolic measurement system via indirect calorimetry. Participants are tested on a treadmill applying the Pepper protocol. Briefly, the protocol starts with an inclination of of 0% and a velocity of 2.5 miles per hour. Exercise intensity increases every minute by elevating either inclination or velocity. Tests are terminated when subjects reached 85% of their predicted VO2max. All posttests are scheduled at the same day and similar times of the day as pretestings.
Overall trial start date
Overall trial end date
Participant inclusion criteria
1. Between 18-59 years of age
2. Currently sedentary or had not exercised more than twice a week for the last three months
3. If a person has two risk factors related to cardiovascular disease, they are required to have a medical exam and physician consent
Target number of participants
targeted were 40 participants (20 in each group); actual participants: 39 (20 in trail, 19 in road)
Participant exclusion criteria
1. If a person had more than two risk factors in the American College of Sports and Medicine (ACSM) Risk Stratification
2. Didn't meet the age range,
3. Worked out more than 2x a week.
Recruitment start date
Recruitment end date
Countries of recruitment
United States of America
Trial participating centre
Northern Michigan University
United States of America
Investigator initiated and funded
Funding Body Type
Funding Body Subtype
Results and Publications
Publication and dissemination plan
Publication is intended with, and application submitted (currently under revision) to, BMC Sports Science, Medicine & Rehabilitation after review process. Any additional documents are available upon request.
IPD sharing statement:
The participant level data are available upon request from Marisa Heckendorn (Marisa.Heckendorn@unibas.ch).
Intention to publish date
Participant level data
Available on request
Results - basic reporting