Evaluation of late clinical events after drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in patients at risk
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN72444640 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN72444640 |
| Protocol serial number | N/A |
| Sponsor | University Hospital Basel (Switzerland) |
| Funders | The Swiss National Foundation for Research (Switzerland) (study grant applied for), Additional funding by unrestricted grants from third parties will be searched for. |
- Submission date
- 18/01/2007
- Registration date
- 01/02/2007
- Last edited
- 17/12/2015
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Circulatory System
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Scientific
Department of Cardiology
University Hospital
Petersgraben 4
Basel
4031
Switzerland
| pfisterer@email.ch |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Prospective randomised open-label muticentre trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | Evaluation of late clinical events after drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in patients at risk: BAsel Stent Kosten Effektivitäts Trial - PROspective Validation Examination |
| Study acronym | BASKET-PROVE |
| Study objectives | The recent findings and analyses of the BAsel Stent Kosten Effektivitäts Trial (BASKET) and the Basel Stent Cost-effectiveness Trial - LAte Thrombotic Events trial (BASKET-LATE) are the basis for two relevant questions which will be addressed prospectively in BASKET-PROVE. The aims of BASKET-PROVE are therefore: 1. To validate findings of BASKET/BASKET-LATE, i.e. that patients with large native vessel stenting (more than or equal to 3.0 mm stents only) do not clinically benefit from Drug Eluting Stents (DES) regarding cardiac death/non-fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI) compared to a third generation Bare Metal Stent (BMS) over an 18 months observation period and may be associated even with a certain small late harm (i.e. comparison of Cypher-Select® versus Vision® stents) 2. To evaluate whether a stent with the same cobalt-chromium platform as Vision® but with a lower dose of a limus drug (Xience®, coated with Everolimus) has a similar late outcome as the third generation BMS Vision® stent (no increase in late cardiac death/MI) |
| Ethics approval(s) | Local Ethics Committee (Ethikkommission beider Basel), 11/01/2007, ref: 327/06 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Coronary artery disease |
| Intervention | Patients will be randomised to: 1. 1:1 to PCI and Stent placement with Cypher-Select® (standard first generation DES) versus Vision® (third generation cobalt-chromium BMS) 2. 1:1 to Xience® (DES with a lower dose of a limus drug, i.e. Everolimus [Abbott Vascular, Abbott Laboratories, Illinois, US]). |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Freedom of combination of: |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
1. Non-MI related Target Vessel Revascularisation (TVR) |
| Completion date | 31/12/2010 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Not Specified |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 2400 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. All comers, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, irrespective of indication for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) 2. With the need for large (more than or equal to 3.0 mm stents only) native vessel stenting |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. In-stent-restenosis 2. Bypass graft disease 3. Main stem disease to be stented 4. Cardiogenic shock 5. Planned surgery within the next six months 6. Oral anticoagulation needed (artificial heart valves, atrial fibrillation) 7. No compliance expected 8. Enrolled in another study 9. No consent |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/02/2007 |
| Date of final enrolment | 16/05/2008 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Denmark
- Norway
- Switzerland
Study participating centre
4031
Switzerland
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 03/10/2013 | Yes | No | |
| Results article | results | 01/10/2015 | Yes | No | |
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |