Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Date applied
Date assigned
Last edited
Prospectively registered
Overall trial status
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Trial website

Contact information



Primary contact

Prof Stefan Priebe


Contact details

Academic Unit
Newham Centre for Mental Health
Glen Road
E13 8SP
United Kingdom

Additional identifiers

EudraCT number number

Protocol/serial number

HTA 07/60/43

Study information

Scientific title

Financial incentives to improve adherence to anti-psychotic maintenance medication in non-adherent patients: a cluster randomised controlled trial



Study hypothesis

The objective of the study is to establish the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using financial incentives to improve adherence to anti-psychotic maintenance medication in patients with poor adherence with whom all conventional methods to achieve adherence have failed.

More details can be found at:
Protocol can be found at:

Ethics approval

Not provided at time of registration

Study design

Multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial

Primary study design


Secondary study design

Cluster randomised trial

Trial setting


Trial type


Patient information sheet

Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet


Severe mental illness (psychosis)


Patients in the assertive outreach teams that have been allocated to the intervention will be offered a financial incentive for each depot injection of anti-psychotic medication they receive, for a 12-month period. Patients will receive £15 for one injection with the total sum not exceeding £60 for a four-week period (the maximum number of injections is 4 per month).

The control group will receive treatment as usual.
The total duration of the intervention will be 12 months with a 6-month follow-up period.

Intervention type



Not Applicable

Drug names

Primary outcome measure

Adherence to anti-psychotic maintenance medication during the 12-month trial period. Adherence will be measured, objectively, as the percentage of prescribed depot injections actually taken. As the primary outcome, the percentage will be used as a continuous variable. However, we will also analyse the percentage in a dichotomised way, comparing the ratio of patients with 'good' adherence (i.e., greater than or equal to 80% of prescribed depots taken) in the two conditions.

Secondary outcome measures

1. The time 'slippage' of taking depots, defined as the percentage of the prescribed time interval that has expired before the depot is taken
2. Clinical improvement as assessed on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) by the treating consultant psychiatrist at the end of the 12-month period
3. Number of involuntary and voluntary hospital admissions during the trial period
4. Costs of care: data on the use and frequency of use of inpatient care, outpatient care (including home visits, home treatment), and other health services during the 12-month treatment period will be obtained from case notes and electronic administrative data bases. Costs for the intervention will be estimated for each participating team from information provided by staff. Established national unit costs will be used to estimate direct health care.
5. The number of attempted and completed suicides, incidences of physical violence, police arrests and days spent at work/training/education will also be recorded over the 12-month trial period
6. Subjective quality of life and satisfaction with medication which will be assessed at the beginning and end of the intervention period using the 11-item scale established in the DIALOG trial. The scale contains 11 items asking patients to rate their satisfaction with eight life domains and three treatment aspects, one of which is medication, on a scale ranging from 1 (lowest satisfaction) to 7 (highest satisfaction).
7. Continuation with MfM (in intervention group only) and adherence during a 6-month follow up period will be taken from the medical records
8. Teams in the intervention group will be asked after 6 months, 12 months and 18 months about all aspects of experiences with the scheme including whether patients on MfM asked for an increase of the incentive, and whether other patients with hitherto good adherence also asked for financial incentives and/or became poorly adherent in order to be eligible for MfM. This will be done using open questions with a written documentation of the answers.

Overall trial start date


Overall trial end date


Reason abandoned (if study stopped)


Participant inclusion criteria

The only inclusion criterion for teams is that they are a dedicated assertive outreach team (AOT) and operate a corresponding policy. The only exclusion criteria are lack of willingness to participate and an already existing practice of money for medication (MfM).

For patients in the AOTs there are the following inclusion criteria:
1. Being cared in the AOT for at least 4 months
2. Aged between 18 and 65 years of age, either sex
3. Capacity to give informed consent to participate in the study and actual written informed consent
4. An established diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizo-affective psychosis, or bipolar illness according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10)
5. Being prescribed depot injections of anti-psychotic medication
6. Poor adherence to anti-psychotic medication, i.e., missed 50% or more of prescribed depot injections, over the last 4 months (so that the percentage of taken depots is based on a minimum of 4 prescribed depots)
7. Failure of all other methods available to the team to ensure adherence to medication

Participant type


Age group




Target number of participants

136 patients from 34 assertive outreach teams

Participant exclusion criteria

1. Learning difficulty
2. Poor command of English so that clinical communication and discussion of agreements is impaired

Recruitment start date


Recruitment end date



Countries of recruitment

United Kingdom

Trial participating centre

Newham Centre for Mental Health
E13 8SP
United Kingdom

Sponsor information


Barts and The London Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry (UK)

Sponsor details

c/o Gerry Leonard
The Joint R&D Office
1st Floor Portakabins
24-26 Walden Street
E1 2AN
United Kingdom

Sponsor type




Funder type


Funder name

Health Technology Assessment Programme

Alternative name(s)

NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA

Funding Body Type

government organisation

Funding Body Subtype

Federal/National Government


United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

Not provided at time of registration

Intention to publish date

Participant level data

Not provided at time of registration

Basic results (scientific)

Publication list

2009 protocol in:
2013 results in:
2015 results in:
2015 results in:
2015 results in:
2016 results in:
2016 results in:

Publication citations

  1. Protocol

    Priebe S, Burton A, Ashby D, Ashcroft R, Burns T, David A, Eldridge S, Firn M, Knapp M, McCabe R, Financial incentives to improve adherence to anti-psychotic maintenance medication in non-adherent patients - a cluster randomised controlled trial (FIAT)., BMC Psychiatry, 2009, 9, 61, doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-9-61.

  2. Results

    Priebe S, Yeeles K, Bremner S, Lauber C, Eldridge S, Ashby D, David AS, O'Connell N, Forrest A, Burns T, Effectiveness of financial incentives to improve adherence to maintenance treatment with antipsychotics: cluster randomised controlled trial., BMJ, 2013, 347, f5847.

  3. Results

    Highton-Williamson E, Barnicot K, Kareem T, Priebe S, Offering financial incentives to increase adherence to antipsychotic medication: the clinician experience, J Clin Psychopharmacol, 2015, 35, 2, 120-127, doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000276.

  4. Results

    Pavlickova H, Bremner SA, Priebe S, The effect of financial incentives on adherence to antipsychotic depot medication: does it change over time?, J Clin Psychiatry, 2015, 76, 8, e1029-e1034.

  5. Results

    Henderson C, Knapp M, Yeeles K, Bremner S, Eldridge S, David AS, O'Connell N, Burns T, Priebe S, Cost-Effectiveness of Financial Incentives to Promote Adherence to Depot Antipsychotic Medication: Economic Evaluation of a Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial, PLoS One, 2015, 10, 10, e0138816, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138816.

Additional files

Editorial Notes

30/09/2016: Publication reference added. 23/09/2016: Publication reference added.