Condition category
Date applied
Date assigned
Last edited
Retrospectively registered
Overall trial status
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Publication status

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Bleeding to death is the most preventable cause of post-traumatic death on earth. Many of these victims could be saved with relatively basic surgery if only they were in a location where surgery could be performed. Damage Control Surgery (DCS), is an approach which aims to simplify basic operations to save lives even if further surgery is required. Medical technology is fast advancing. Telemedicine is used to provide medical direction over a distance, and includes remote telementoring (RTM) where experts provide real-time remote guidance might allow non-surgeons to do DCS. Therefore this study will study numerous factors required to best support non-surgeons in the performance of life-saving techniques of resuscitation including performing DCS in the abdominal cavity. These factors will consist of the performance differences between trained surgeons and non-surgeons, the ability to remotely mentor non-surgeons, and their relative stress while doing so, and the ability to do so in stressful and difficult situations including a remote medical outpost, on board a ship, and during weightless aboard a “zero-G” aircraft. The main tools to be used will be the plastic organs and blood vessels of the Human Worn Partial Task Surgical Simulator (CutSuit) which is a hyper-realistic training tool that allows the performance of realistic surgical procedures on a simulated victim with realistic bleeding and the feel of real skin and tissue. We want to test if (a) experienced surgeons will lose less blood and experience less stress than non-surgeons and (b) whether RTM non-surgeons can be guided to perform life-saving procedures and that RTM will reduce stress even in far-forward operating bases, on-board ships, and weightlessness.

Who can participate?
Surgeons and military medical technicians.

What does the study involve?
In general, this study assesses “naïve first responders” (i.e. medical technicians) ability to pack the abdomen of a seriously injured person at risk of bleeding to death with the guidance of a surgeon though RTM. Participants are randomly allocated into one of two groups. Those in group 1 receive RTM with an experienced surgeon. Those in group 2 do not receive RTM. Each participant fills in a questionnaire about their medical training background and any surgical training background in particular. They are also asked questions regarding any familiarity that they have with surgical simulation and, in particular, any experience of the CutSuit. They are all given a brief refresher course on hemorrhage control and how to potentially handle medical cases where the victim is bleeding to death from either a massive limb or abdomen injury. Each participant is then asked to perform hemorrhage control using either a first aid method or to perform a cut in the middle of the abdomen to gain entrance to the abdominal cavity, determine the site of the bleeding and pack within the abdominal cavity to compress this bleeding. Each participants performance is assessed according to the time taken to complete the procedure (TTTC) and the volume of shed blood (VSB). Comparisons are made within the two groups assessing different techniques for closing wounds and performing life changing procedures in different environments. We also compare the TTTC and VSB between naïve first responders and experienced surgeons and between surgeons performing in a normal gravity environment verses a weightless environment.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
As with any surgical intervention, there is always a risk to the participant in self-inflicted injuries from handling scalpels, hemostatic clips, or other sharp instruments. These are similar risks to those that medical personal face when learning any invasive procedures. In order to partially mitigate these risks there will be very experienced “safety surgeons” present who will be observing for any unduly unsafe procedures that are that may place the participant at risk. The “safety surgeons” have the authority to halt the simulation and to exclude the participant from further participation at no penalty to the participant. While sharp injuries are possible there will be no risks of biocontamination as the CutSuit and fluids are completely inanimate. If the “safety surgeons” also perceive that any participant is undergoing undo physical or psychological distress they will halt the simulation and debrief the participant at no penalty to the participant. The purpose of this study is to collect data in order to further the mission of advancing resuscitative surgery in the field and “far forward situations”. This is not intended as a training exercise for the participants.

Where is the study run from?
Flight Research Laboratory, National Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Field Hospital (Ottawa Detachment)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2014 to June 2017

Who is funding the study?
1. Canadian Forces Medical Services
2. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

Who is the main contact?
Professor Andrew Kirkpatrick

Trial website

Contact information



Primary contact

Mr Andrew Kirkpatrick


Contact details

Trauma Services
1403 29 St NW
T2N 2T9
+1 (0)403 944 2888

Additional identifiers

EudraCT number number

Protocol/serial number


Study information

Scientific title

The marriage of advanced surgical simulation training with telepresence mentoring: training for damage control surgery in austere environments


Study hypothesis

Motivated but surgically-inexperienced first responders can be guided to perform expedited extremity wound closure and midline trauma laparotomy with visceral packing of simulated solid organ bleeding in austere environments, including weightlessness, through TM.

Ethics approval

University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board Research Services Office, ref: REB14-0634

Study design

Incrementally progressive randomised controlled trial studies using surgical simulation

Primary study design


Secondary study design

Randomised controlled trial

Trial setting


Trial type


Patient information sheet

Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet




The Human Worn Partial Task Surgical Simulator (Cut Suit) is a hyper-realistic surgical training tool that allows the performance of realistic surgical procedures on simulated casualties. Real-time telementoring is a telemedicine technique that facilitates procedure naïve responders to perform complex tasks while mentored by remote experts. Responders will be required to perform potentially life-saving technical procedures:
1. Close a thigh incision with a simulated lacerated superficial femoral artery
2. Incise the midline of the cut suit, enter the peritoneal cavity and pack with standard surgical gauze to control a standardized and randomized visceral (splenic/hepatic or both) haemorrhage
3. Perform life-saving interventions and follow damage control resuscitation principals.
Telementoring will be provided through a freely-available Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP) system (Skype) in which the first responders will wear head-mounted video-cameras allowing the remote mentor to view and guide their hand movements in real-time. Variable gravitational environments will be provided through the use of the National Research Council of Canada’s (NRC) Flight Research Laboratory’s (FRL) Falcon 20 research aircraft. The relative effectiveness of naïve first responder’s ability to viscerally pack with TM guidance will be quantified through:
1. Comparison between the time to task completion (TTTC) and volume of shed blood (VSB) between naïve first responders (NMFRs) and board-certified general surgeons (BCGSs).
2. Comparison between the time to task completion (TTTC) and volume of shed blood (VSB) between telementored (TM) surgically inexperienced first responders (TM-SIFRs) and surgically inexperienced first responders without TM. The first responders will be randomly allocated into one of the two aforementioned groups.
3. Comparison of the resultant TTTC and VSB, in the comparative environments of 1g normal gravity and 0g weightlessness, as well as the descriptive practicality of (a) closing a serious extremity wound and (b) performing a DCS laparotomy in weightlessness. We will be using experienced surgeons who will do the procedures in weightless (0g) or on the ground (1g) and this will not be randomized, but will consist of each subject constituting their own comparison between on the ground and parabolic flight.
4. Comparison of the time to overall task completion (TTOTC) when performing suture closure of the skin only, versus abbreviated closure using the ITclamp rapid wound for (a) extremity
(b) laparotomy for randomly allocated telementored (TM) surgically inexperienced first responders (TM-SIFRs) and surgically inexperienced first responders without TM.
5. Demonstration of the feasibility to conduct remotely mentored live saving procedures including damage control laparotomies between BCGSs and TM-SIFRs when the TM-SIFRs are
(a) separated from the mentors by many times zones and oceans or (b) on-board a ship. We will be comparing randomly allocated telementored (TM) surgically inexperienced first responders (TM-SIFRs) and surgically inexperienced first responders without TM.

Intervention type



Drug names

Primary outcome measure

Volume of shed simulated blood (VSB)

Secondary outcome measures

1. Time to task completion (TTTC)
2. Adequacy of life-saving procedures
3. User satisfaction surveys
4. Physiological and biomedical response data of the users during the simulated procedures

Overall trial start date


Overall trial end date


Reason abandoned (if study stopped)


Participant inclusion criteria

1. Surgeon
2. Military medical technician

Participant type

Healthy volunteer

Age group




Target number of participants


Participant exclusion criteria

Unwillingness to participate

Recruitment start date


Recruitment end date



Countries of recruitment


Trial participating centre

Flight Research Laboratory, National Research Council of Canada
Building U-61 1920 Research Rd Ottawa Airport
K1A 0R6

Trial participating centre

Canadian Field Hospital - Ottawa Detachment
National Defence 1745 Alta Vista Dr.
K1A 0K6

Sponsor information


Canadian Forces Medical Services

Sponsor details

1 Canadian Field Hospital - Ottawa Detachment
National Defence
1745 Alta Vista Dr.
K1A 0K6

Sponsor type




Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

Sponsor details

774 Echo Drive
K1S 5N8
+1 (0)613 730 8177

Sponsor type




Funder type


Funder name

Canadian Forces Medical Services (Canada)

Alternative name(s)

Funding Body Type

Funding Body Subtype


Funder name

Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

Alternative name(s)

Funding Body Type

Funding Body Subtype


Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

The results of all phases of the project will be presented at medical conferences for public disclosure and submitted for publication to peer reviewed medical journals

Intention to publish date

Participant level data

Available on request

Basic results (scientific)

Publication list

2018 results in:
2015 results in:
2020 results in (added 25/11/2020)

Publication citations

Additional files

Editorial Notes

25/11/2020: Publication reference added. 19/09/2018: Publication reference added. 11/04/2016: Publication reference added.