A comparison of the effects of remifentanil infusion compared with conventional anaesthesia on postoperative pain in patients undergoing spinal surgery
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN84240582 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN84240582 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | N0084118520 |
- Submission date
- 12/09/2003
- Registration date
- 12/09/2003
- Last edited
- 31/03/2020
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Signs and Symptoms
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Dr P Burford
Scientific
Scientific
Department of Anaesthetics
Hull Royal Infirmary
Anlaby Road
Hull
HU3 2JZ
United Kingdom
Study information
| Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Interventional |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study setting(s) | Hospital |
| Study type | Treatment |
| Scientific title | A comparison of the effects of remifentanil infusion compared with conventional anaesthesia on postoperative pain in patients undergoing spinal surgery |
| Study objectives | To compare postoperative analgesia requirements in patients receiving anaesthesia with remifentanil and those receiving conventional anaesthesia. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Signs and Symptoms: Pain, sedation, nausea, vomiting |
| Intervention | 1. Conventional anaesthesia 2. Total intravenous anaesthesia |
| Intervention type | Drug |
| Pharmaceutical study type(s) | |
| Phase | Not Specified |
| Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s) | |
| Primary outcome measure | Pain, sedation, nausea and vomiting scores recorded hourly for 8 h after surgery - this is routine. |
| Secondary outcome measures | Not provided at time of registration |
| Overall study start date | 15/11/2002 |
| Completion date | 01/06/2003 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Not Specified |
| Sex | Not Specified |
| Target number of participants | 62 |
| Key inclusion criteria | A sample size of 31 patients in each group, presenting for spinal surgery is desired |
| Key exclusion criteria | Not provided at time of registration |
| Date of first enrolment | 15/11/2002 |
| Date of final enrolment | 01/06/2003 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Hull Royal Infirmary
Hull
HU3 2JZ
United Kingdom
HU3 2JZ
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Department of Health (UK)
Government
Government
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom
| Website | http://www.doh.gov.uk |
|---|
Funders
Funder type
Government
The North and South Bank Research and Development Consortium (UK)
No information available
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Editorial Notes
31/03/2020: No publications found, all search options exhausted, study status unverified.
