The Bliss cluster randomised control trial on the Effects of Active Dissemination of Information

ISRCTN ISRCTN89683698
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN89683698
Secondary identifying numbers 05/Q0605/180
Submission date
14/05/2007
Registration date
05/06/2007
Last edited
05/12/2017
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Dominique Acolet
Scientific

The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health
Chiltern Court
188 Baker Street
London
NW1 5SD
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designCluster randomised control trial.
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeNot Specified
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleThe Bliss cluster randomised control trial on the Effects of Active Dissemination of Information
Study acronymBEADI
Study objectivesThe aim of BEADI is to assess whether an innovative ‘active’ strategy for the dissemination of neonatal research findings, recommendations and national neonatal guidelines is more likely to lead to changes in policy and practice than the traditional (more passive) forms of dissemination in the UK.
Ethics approval(s)East London and The City HA Local Research Ethics Committee 3. Ref 05/Q0605/180
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPremature babies
InterventionOf the 181 units recruited, 87 and 94 units were randomised into the active group and the control group, respectively.

The key methods involved in the “Active Dissemination of Information” strategy are:
1. Audit, feedback and benchmarking of units in active arm
2. Active arm lead clinicians participating in workshops with opinion leaders’ lectures on evidence based practice around each outcome and consensus process
3. Implementation of changes at units level with reinforcement by regional leaders trained in organisation of changes

The duration of the intervention was 3 months (October - December 2006).
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureOutcome measures involve detecting whether there has been a change in any of the following four indicators after the active educational intervention has taken place:
1. Experienced resuscitation team present at birth
2. Surfactant administration in labour ward and timing of intubation
3. Temperature on admission to the neonatal unit and timing of first measurement of temperature
4. Use of plastic bag to prevent heat loss at birth

The four indicators will be measured at baseline and three months after the intervention.
Secondary outcome measuresNo secondary outcome measures
Overall study start date01/10/2005
Completion date01/10/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants181 units , 60 clinicians
Key inclusion criteriaHospital staff : Lead neonatologist for clinical governance in each maternity hospital in England.
Babies born in England before 27 weeks gestation between January 2006 - 31st March 2007.
Key exclusion criteriaNone
Date of first enrolment01/10/2005
Date of final enrolment01/10/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health
London
NW1 5SD
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (UK)
Government

Chiltern Court
188 Baker Street
London
NW1 5SD
United Kingdom

Website http://www.cemach.org.uk

Funders

Funder type

Charity

BLISS - The premature baby charity (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 08/10/2007 Yes No
Results article results 01/11/2011 Yes No

Editorial Notes

05/12/2017: internal review.