Impact of iloprost on early graft viability after liver transplantation

ISRCTN ISRCTN95672167
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN95672167
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
31/07/2008
Registration date
09/10/2008
Last edited
27/09/2017
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Erik Bärthel
Scientific

Department of General Visceral and Vascular Surgery
University Hospital of Jena
Jena
07740
Germany

Study information

Study designProspective randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleImpact of iloprost on early graft viability after liver transplantation: a randomised controlled trial
Study objectivesImproved graft viability under treatment with systemically administered prostacyclin analogue iloprost.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics Committee of Medical Faculty, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena (Ethik-Kommission der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena an der Medizinischen Fakultät). Date of approval: 20/06/2006 (ref: 1765-04/06)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedLiver transplantation
InterventionA prospective, randomised, single-center study. Patients of the treatment group received 1 ng/kg body weight /min iloprost (BayerVital AG Berlin, Germany), systemically administered for 7 days post-liver transplantation, in contrast to the control (no treatment) population. Peak levels of transaminases (aspartate aminotransferase [ASAT]/alanine aminotransferase [ALAT]), factor V, quick's value, bile production and the indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR), were determined continuously. Furthermore, the arterial resistance index (RI) as parameter of liver perfusion as well as patient and graft survival were evaluated.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Iloprost
Primary outcome measureIncidence of primary graft dysfunction within 48 hours postoperatively.
Secondary outcome measures1. Rate of re-transplantation caused by initial graft non-function within 48 hours postoperatively
2. Time of hospitalisation (duration of follow-up depends on the circumstances of each patient)
3. Length of stay in intensive care unit (duration of follow-up depends on the circumstances of each patient)
4. Rate of complications due to biliary tract lesions within 1-year follow-up
Overall study start date01/09/2006
Completion date01/09/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants80
Key inclusion criteria1. Aged over 18 years, either gender
2. Full size orthotop liver transplantation
Key exclusion criteria1. Circulatory instability
2. Noradrenaline doses >0.5 µg/kg body weight/min
3. Pregnancy
4. Known intolerance of iloprost
Date of first enrolment01/09/2006
Date of final enrolment01/09/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Germany

Study participating centre

Department of General Visceral and Vascular Surgery
Jena
07740
Germany

Sponsor information

University Hospital of Jena (Universitätsklinikum Jena) (Germany)
Hospital/treatment centre

Department of General Visceral and Vascular Surgery
Erlanger Allee 101
Jena
07740
Germany

Website http://www.uniklinikum-jena.de
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/035rzkx15

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

University Hospital of Jena (Germany)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results of pilot study 01/01/2012 Yes No

Editorial Notes

27/09/2017: internal review.