Comparing a new combination of medicines to the usual intensive chemotherapy treatment given to participants who have been recently diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN12537955 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12537955 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT) | Nil known |
| Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) | Nil known |
| Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) | 1012553 |
| Protocol serial number | Nil known |
| Sponsor | Didact Foundation |
| Funder | Stemline Therapeutics |
- Submission date
- 16/09/2025
- Registration date
- 08/12/2025
- Last edited
- 08/12/2025
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Overall study status
- Ongoing
- Condition category
- Cancer
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
This study is for people with a type of cancer of the bone marrow called Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML). The purpose of this study is to test the safety and effectiveness of a new combination of four medicines, tagraxofusp, venetoclax, cytarabine and cladribine compared with the normal standard of care intensive chemotherapy treatment, in fit adults with newly diagnosed AML either aged 18-70 with high-risk AML or older adults (aged 50-70) with intermediate risk AML, with the aim of increasing the number of patients who can proceed to a potentially curative transplant.
There will be about 30 people taking part in the first part of this study (Part 1) and about 192 people taking part in the second part (Part 2), all patients will be from hospitals all over the UK. Patients in Part 1 will all receive the new combination of four medicines and in Part 2 will be assigned randomly to one of two groups (Arms A and B): Arm A will receive the standard of care intensive chemotherapy treatment (abbreviated to either DA, DA+GO, CPX351 (Vyxeos) or FLAG-Ida) and Part 2 Arm B will receive the new combination of four medicines for intensive treatment: tagraxofusp, venetoclax, cytarabine and cladribine. Patients in both Arms will receive a minimum of two cycles of treatment. Patients will be recruited over approximately 15 months for Part 1 and 18 months for Part 2 and followed for up to 7 years. This study will consist of Screening, Study Treatment, Study Treatment Discontinuation, Long-Term Follow-Up and Survival Follow Up periods.
Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 years or older with Adverse risk AML, or aged 50 years or older with Intermediate risk AML .
What does the study involve?
Study design: The study design is based as closely as possible to the standard of care (SOC) pathway in this patient population; therefore the additional burden to patients as a result of being on the study is minimal. Only the following assessments are additional to SOC in both arms: bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) sample repeated at screening for translational studies; pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential at treatment discontinuation; quality of life (QoL) questionnaires at 4-6 timepoints during the study. To help minimise the impact of the baseline molecular genetic testing and measurable residual disease (MRD) disease assessment (using the BM and PB), a separate Informed Consent Form (ICF) can be used, either prior to or following the patient’s formal acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) diagnosis, to allow for these to be collected from the patient’s diagnostic samples and to avoid having to repeat them at screening. This was implemented following widespread discussions with the proposed investigational sites. Possible side effects to participants if they need an extra BM and PB sample at screening (above SOC) include: bleeding, bruising, infection, pain and tingling of the leg. The SOC Arm A treatment options were agreed following discussions with various UK consultant haematologists, to ensure this is a true reflection of the current UK patient population/treatment. Therefore, patients randomised to Arm A will receive the same treatment they would receive if they chose not to join the study. Careful consideration has been given through statistical methods to minimise the risk to patients. Power calculations have been utilised to calculate the minimum required sample size whilst maintaining statistical power.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Benefits:
Not provided at time of registration
Risks:
Risk related to the IMP:
Arm A will receive the standard of care intensive chemotherapy treatment of daunorubicin and cytarabine (DA), DA and gemtuzumab ozogamicin (DA+GO), a combination of daunorubicin and cytarabine called CPX-351 (Vyxeos), or fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and idarubicin (FLAG-Ida). These treatments are abbreviated to DA, DA+GO, CPX351 (Vyxeos) or FLAG-Ida and since these treatments are standard of care, they reflect current UK patient population treatment risk.
Part 1 and Arm B will receive the new combination of four medicines for intensive treatment: tagraxofusp, venetoclax, cytarabine and cladribine (TAG/VEN/LDAC/CLAD).
TAG: Very Common AE's include low blood platelet count, anaemia, changes in levels of minerals in the blood such as low albumin, Capillary leak syndrome which can lead to dangerous drops in blood pressure (Hypotension), nausea, vomiting, fatigue and elevated transaminases (a sign of liver stress). Other AE's are listed in the PIS.
VEN: Common AEs in people treated with VEN include: increased risk of infection, lung problems, anaemia, changes in levels of minerals in the blood, such as high potassium and phosphate and low calcium, diarrhoea or constipation, feeling or being sick, and fatigue. Occasional AEs are detailed in the PIS.
LDAC - low dose cytarabine: Most common AE's are gastrointestinal undesirable effects like swallowing problems, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea etc. Cytarabine is toxic to the bone marrow, and causes haematological undesirable effects like anaemia. LDAC can also commonly give eye disorders and skin disorders like rashes.
CLAD Common AE's include fever, fatigue, nausea, rash, headache, and administration site reactions.
Potential risks and burdens are described in the PIS so that potential patients can clearly understand what is involved if they consent to take part. Supportive medications will be given as per local practice.
Where is the study run from?
Accelerating Clinical Trials Ltd (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
September 2025 to June 2032
Who is funding the study?
Stemline Therapeutics (Netherlands)
Who is the main contact?
Amy.Desa@act4patients.com
Lay summary under review with external organisation
Contact information
Public, Scientific
48 Chancery Lane
London
WC2A 1JF
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 7707 138207 |
|---|---|
| Amy.Desa@act4patients.com |
Principal investigator
Centre for Clinical Haematology
University Hospitals Birmingham
Birmingham
B15 2TH
United Kingdom
| charles.craddock@uhb.nhs.uk |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Interventional randomized parallel group controlled trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised parallel trial |
| Scientific title | A phase I/II open-label cohort evaluating the safety and efficacy of a tagraxofusp, venetoclax, cladribine, cytarabine induction regimen, leading into a randomised open-label cohort evaluating safety and efficacy of a tagraxofusp, venetoclax, cladribine, cytarabine induction regimen compared with intensive chemotherapy in fit adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia |
| Study acronym | ACT-AML-901 |
| Study objectives | Primary objectives: Part 1 - To assess the safety and tolerability of TAG/CLAD/VEN/LDAC chemotherapy and the clinical activity of the combination. Part 2 - To compare the efficacy of TAG/CLAD/VEN/LDAC therapy (experimental arm) with standard of care IC (control arm) as measured by Event Free Survival. Secondary objective: To compare and evaluate the safety, efficacy and tolerability of TAG/CLAD/VEN/LDAC therapy (experimental arm) versus standard of care. |
| Ethics approval(s) |
Submitted 23/09/2025, North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee (NHSBT Newcastle Blood Donor Centre, Holland Drive, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE2 4NQ, United Kingdom; +44 207 104 8077; newcastlenorthtyneside1.rec@hra.nhs.uk), ref: 25/NE/0182 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Newly diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukaemia |
| Intervention | The ACT-AML-901 study is a prospective, multi-centre, two part open-label, Phase I/II, 2:1 randomized study comparing tagraxofusp, venetoclax, cytarabine and cladribine combination therapy with the current standard of care induction chemotherapy schedules chemotherapy schedules in fit adults, with either newly diagnosed European LeukaemiaNet (ELN) 2022 adverse risk AML (18 to 70 years of age) or ELN 2022 intermediate-risk AML (50 to 70 years of age). There will be about 30 participants enrolled into Part 1(Experimental) of this study, and 192 participants randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups (2:1), Part 2 Arm B (Experimental) or Arm A (Control)/ Arm A (control arm): Two cycles, up to 42 days each, of standard-of-care intensive induction chemotherapy, with either daunorubicin and cytarabine (DA), DA with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (DA+GO), CPX-351 (Vyxeos) or FLAG-Ida (fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and idarubicin. Patients who achieve < 5% bone marrow blasts after 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy should be considered candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) as definitive therapy. Patients may receive an additional 1-2 cycles of standard-of-care consolidation chemotherapy (high dose cytarabine or Vyxeos) prior to allo-SCT as clinically indicated. The above medications are defined as Non-Investigational Medicinal Products (NIMPs) in the context of this study as these are only being given as per standard of care to newly diagnosed AML patients. Part 1 and Part 2 Arm B (Experimental arm): Two cycles, up to 42 days each, of tagraxofusp, venetoclax, cytarabine and cladribine combination induction therapy. Patients who achieve <5% bone marrow blasts after 2 cycles of tagraxofusp, venetoclax, cytarabine and cladribine induction chemotherapy should be considered candidates for allo-SCT. Patients may receive additional cycles of venetoclax and azacitidine therapy prior to allo-SCT as clinically indicated. The above medications are defined as Investigational Medicinal Products (IMPs) in the context of this study A total of 222 adults with newly diagnosed AML who fulfil the eligibility criteria will be recruited. Patients will be recruited over approximately 15 months for Part 1 and 18 months for Part 2 and followed for up to 7 years from the date of randomisation of the first patient. The entire study is expected to last approximately 7 years. All patients who achieve < 5% bone marrow blasts after 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy will be followed for survival until death, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up, completion of survival follow-up, or study termination by the sponsor, whichever occurs first. Patients who do not achieve < 5% bone marrow blasts after 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy will be withdrawn from the study. Follow-up of all patients will be performed as follows: monthly during year 1 post allo-SCT, every 2 months during year 2 post allo-SCT and 6-monthly during year 3 onwards post allo-SCT. |
| Intervention type | Drug |
| Phase | Phase II |
| Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s) | Tagraxofusp, cladribine, venetoclax, cytarabine |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Superiority of the tagraxofusp, venetoclax, cladribine, cytarabine combination therapy versus standard of care intensive chemotherapy as measured by event free survival (EFS). The planned primary analysis will take place when 115 EFS events have occurred, or all patients have been followed for a minimum of 1 year, which is expected to occur approximately 30 months from the date of randomisation of the first patient into the study. |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
Safety, efficacy and tolerability of TAG/CLAD/VEN/LDAC combination therapy (experimental arm) versus standard of care IC (control arm) as measured by: |
| Completion date | 01/06/2032 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Mixed |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Upper age limit | 100 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 222 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Adverse risk AML according to European Leukaemia Net (ELN) 2022 criteria (Döhner, et al., 2022), aged 18 years or older 2. Intermediate risk AML according to ELN 2022 criteria (Döhner, et al., 2022), aged 50 years or older 3. Evidence of CD123 expression on myeloid blast population 4. The participant is deemed by the treating physician to be fit for intensive chemotherapy 5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0–2 6. Adequate renal, liver, and cardiac function 7. Participant agrees to use an adequate and medically accepted method of contraception throughout the study and for the required contraceptive period if they or their sexual partner are female-born of childbearing potential 8. Negative pregnancy test within 2 weeks prior to randomisation |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Have received previous cytotoxic chemotherapy (intensive or non-intensive), targeted therapies, hypomethylating agents, or venetoclax for the treatment of AML — except: - Hydroxycarbamide to control elevated white blood cell (WBC) count - Lenalidomide, Imetelstat, or luspatercept for the treatment of Myelodysplasia 2. Blastic transformation of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) 3. Clinical suspicion of active central nervous system (CNS) involvement with AML 4. Presence of a FLT3-ITD mutation or an NPM1 mutation during initial rapid diagnostic evaluation 5. Presence of a concurrent malignancy requiring active treatment (see Section 4.2 for exceptions) 6. Diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) 7. Known newly diagnosed or uncontrolled HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection 8. Significant disease or medical conditions, as assessed by the Investigator, which would substantially increase the risk-benefit ratio of participating in the study, including but not limited to: - History of myocardial infarction within 6 months of randomisation - Presence of unstable angina, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), transient ischemic attack (TIA), uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, significant active infections, and congestive heart failure (NYHA Class III–IV) within 3 months of randomisation 9. History of Wilson’s disease or other copper-metabolism disorder 10. Pre-existing liver impairment with known cirrhosis 11. Concomitant use of: - Any strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitors, except posaconazole or voriconazole - Any strong or moderate CYP3A inducers - Preparations containing St John’s Wort 12. Pregnant or lactating participants 13. Participants who are unable to swallow tablets whole 14. Participants receiving any live vaccine within 4 weeks prior to initiation of study treatment 15. Participants known to require vaccination with a live vaccine during the treatment period or for 3 months after the end of study treatment |
| Date of first enrolment | 30/01/2026 |
| Date of final enrolment | 28/07/2027 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
-
-
England
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Published as a supplement to the results publication |
| IPD sharing plan | All data generated or analysed during this study will be included in the subsequent results publication |
Editorial Notes
06/12/2025: ISRCTN received notification of combined HRA/MHRA approval for this trial on 06/12/2025.
16/09/2025: Trial's existence confirmed by NHS HRA.
