The SphynX trail: a randomised clinical trial comparing the outcome of endoluminal fundoplication with EsophyX™ to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD)
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN14127815 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14127815 |
| Protocol serial number | 07-214 |
| Sponsor | University Medical Center Utrecht and seven participating hospitals (The Netherlands) |
| Funders | The costs of this trial are internally covered by the eight participating hospitals in the Netherlands:, University Medical Center Utrecht, Meander Medical Center Amersfoort, Lange Land Hospital Zoetermeer, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Antonius-Mesos Hospital Nieuwegein-Utrecht, Rivierenland Hospital Tiel, Amphia Hospital Breda |
- Submission date
- 17/02/2008
- Registration date
- 26/02/2008
- Last edited
- 26/02/2008
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Digestive System
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Scientific
University Medical Center Utrecht
P.O. Box 85500
H.P. G04.228
Utrecht
3508 GA
Netherlands
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Randomised non-inferiority multicenter trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | |
| Study acronym | SphynX |
| Study objectives | Endoluminal fundoplication with Esophyx™ will not be less effective than laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, expressed as the percentage of successful procedures, based on the patient's opinion at six months after surgery. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Independent central medical ethics committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht has approved the study protocol. Date of approval: 08/01/2008 (EC ref: 07-214; CCMO ref: 1795404107) |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Gastro-esophageal reflux disease |
| Intervention | Endoluminal fundoplication with EsophyX™ versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Effectiveness will be expressed as the percentage of successful procedures, based on the patient's opinion at six months after surgery (Visick grading). Visick classification: grade I: No symptoms, resolved; grade II: Mild occasional symptoms easily controlled, improved; grade III: Mild symptoms not controlled, unchanged; grade IV: Not improved, worsened. Success will be defined as grade I or II and failure will be defined as grade III or IV. |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
1. Success expressed as the percentage of patients with normalisation of acid exposure on pH metry, minus the percentage of patients needing reintervention (dilatation or re-operation) for troublesome dysphagia at six months |
| Completion date | 31/12/2010 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 160 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. GERD patients of eight Dutch hospitals with reflux symptoms persisting for over 6 months despite double dose of Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) (>40 mg omeprazole/24 hours or comparable therapy) and/or patients who refuse or do not tolerate to take acid suppressing drugs for life. 2. Documented temporal relation between pathological reflux and symptoms during 24-hr pH monitoring. Pathological reflux is defined as upright acid exposure >8.4%, supine acid exposure >3.4 % and/or total acid exposure >5.8% on 24-hr pH monitoring. A documented relation between reflux and symptoms is reflected by a Symptom Association Probability (SAP) >95%. 3. Patients without a diaphragmatic hernia or a sliding hernia not exceeding 2 cm (endoscopically measured distance from Z-line and impression of the diaphragm). 4. Age between 18 and 65 years. 5. Informed consent. |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Patients with a diaphragmatic hernia other than of the sliding type and/or larger than 2 cm. 2. Grade C and D esophagitis according to the Los Angeles classification. 3. Histologically proven long-segment Barrett's oesophagus. 4. Patients with severe esophageal or gastric motility disorders. 5. Patients with a history of esophageal- or gastric surgery. 6. American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification III and IV patients. 7. Patients with a psychiatric disease or other conditions making them incapable of filling out the questionnaires or completing the objective esophageal function tests. 8. Pregnancy. |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/01/2009 |
| Date of final enrolment | 31/12/2010 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Netherlands
Study participating centre
3508 GA
Netherlands
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
| Study website | Study website | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |