PFC vs Scorpio total knee replacement: effect of a single radius femoral component on recovery of range of movements

ISRCTN ISRCTN17519020
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17519020
Protocol serial number N0155153523
Sponsor Department of Health
Funders Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust (UK), Trust-Funded, NHS R&D Support Funding
Submission date
30/09/2005
Registration date
30/09/2005
Last edited
07/12/2015
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mr David Wright
Scientific

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
North Manchester General Hospital
Delaunays Road
Manchester
M8 5RB
United Kingdom

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titlePFC vs Scorpio total knee replacement: effect of a single radius femoral component on recovery of range of movements
Study objectivesDoes the scorpio total knee replacement allow patients to recover their range of movements more quickly in comparison to PFC knee replacement?
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedArthroplasty
InterventionDouble-blind randomised controlled trial
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measure(s)

Time it takes to achieve a straight leg raise

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Not provided at time of registration

Completion date01/12/2005

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupSenior
SexAll
Target sample size at registration50
Key inclusion criteria25 patients with osteo-arthritis of the knee between the age of 60-75 years in each arm of the study
Key exclusion criteria1. Patients outside 60-75 years
2. Valgus knee > 20 degrees
3. Any vascular compromise which would lead to a decision not to use a tourniquet
4. Any haematology condition which increases the risk of bleeding
Date of first enrolment01/12/2004
Date of final enrolment01/12/2005

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

North Manchester General Hospital
Manchester
M8 5RB
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes