Randomised trial to compare the clinical value of cyclosporin C12 and C2 monitoring after lung transplantation
ISRCTN | ISRCTN17970029 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17970029 |
Secondary identifying numbers | P00784 |
- Submission date
- 16/05/2005
- Registration date
- 08/07/2005
- Last edited
- 05/07/2018
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Dr Pasupathy Sivasothy
Scientific
Scientific
Transplant Unit
Papworth Hospital NHS Trust
Papworth Everard
CB3 8RE
United Kingdom
Study information
Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Treatment |
Scientific title | Randomised trial to compare the clinical value of cyclosporin C12 and C2 monitoring after lung transplantation |
Study objectives | Does improved control of the variability in exposure to cyclosporin by monitoring C2 in lung transplant recipients help to reduce the propensity of these patients to cyclosporin-associated side effects whilst maintaining effective immunosupression? |
Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Lung transplant recipients |
Intervention | Patients will be randomised into 3 groups to compare the clinical value of both 'high' and 'low' C2 monitoring strategies with conventional C12 monitoring as a guide to cyclosporin Neoral dosage adjustment after lung transplantation. |
Intervention type | Procedure/Surgery |
Primary outcome measure | Renal function at 3 months post transplant |
Secondary outcome measures | Not provided at time of registration |
Overall study start date | 01/04/2003 |
Completion date | 01/04/2006 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Lower age limit | 18 Years |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 90 |
Key inclusion criteria | 90 patients lung transplant: 1. Adult single or double lung and heart + lung transplant recipients (18 years and older) 2. Patients receiving Neoral as primary immunosuppression |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Patients not giving voluntary, written informed consent to participate 2. Re-transplantation 3. Simultaneous kidney, pancreas, liver or bowel transplantation 3. Urine output <50 ml/hour and/or serum creatinine ≥170 mmol/l at the most recent investigation prior to transplantation 4. Renal replacement therapy or any form of renal support such as continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVH) or dialysis before transplantation or within the first post-operative week 5. Patients receiving tacrolimus or sirolimus as primary immuno-suppression in place of Neoral |
Date of first enrolment | 01/04/2003 |
Date of final enrolment | 01/04/2006 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Transplant Unit
Papworth Everard
CB3 8RE
United Kingdom
CB3 8RE
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Papworth Hospital NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre
Hospital/treatment centre
Papworth Everard
Cambridge
CB3 8RE
England
United Kingdom
https://ror.org/01qbebb31 |
Funders
Funder type
Industry
Novartis Pharmaceuticals (UK)
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Abstract results | results presented at 24th International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 01/02/2004 | No | No | |
Abstract results | results presented at 25th International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 01/02/2005 | No | No |
Editorial Notes
05/07/2018: Internal review