Is the type of surgery in the groin influencing the coming back of varicose veins in the long term?

ISRCTN ISRCTN23494731
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN23494731
Protocol serial number N/A
Sponsor Regionalspital Thun (Switzerland)
Funder Regionalspital Thun (Switzerland) - paying incidental costs
Submission date
19/01/2010
Registration date
01/02/2010
Last edited
01/02/2010
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Wolfgang Mouton
Scientific

Krankenhausstrasse 12
Thun
3600
Switzerland

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designProspective randomised study
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleSurgery as a trigger for neorevascularisation in recurrent saphenofemoral incompetence: a randomised trial of three different techniques
Study objectivesSurgery itself, and maybe the type of surgery, may trigger neorevascularistion in the groin when treating sapheno-femoral incompetence.The hypothesis is that one of the following three techniques is better - inducing less neorevascularisation - than the other two. If this would be the case this one technique should be preferred to the other two, worldwide.

The three techniques are:
1. Dissection under ligation
2. Dissection with electrocoagulation
3. Ultrasonic dissection
Ethics approval(s)Ethics Commission of the Regionalspital Thun approved on the 1st March 2002 (ref: 2:4;1.3)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedRecurrent varicose veins
InterventionThe study was approved by the local Human Ethics Committee. All patients included in the study have informed pre-operative consent. 36 consecutive unselected patients underwent redo saphenous high ligation procedures during a period of thirteen months (1st April 2002 - 30th June 2003).

The study population comprised 34 female patients and 2 males. The age ranged from 24 to 73 years (mean 53 years). Thirty-two patients had undergone at least one previous procedure in the groin. The patients were randomised to receive either dissection with ultrasound (Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Johnson and Johnson Company, Spreitenbach, Switzerland) or electrocoagulation (Elektrotom Berchtold GmbH&Co, Tuttlingen, Germany) or sharp dissection with ligation of scar and lymphatic tissue using absorbable suture material (Vicryl, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Johnson and Johnson Company, Spreitenbach, Switzerland).

The groin was reopened via a transverse incision. The femoral artery was visualised as a landmark, after which the femoral vein was dissected and recurrent veins ligated and divided. Fascia and subcutaneous tissue was closed in two layers and included a vacuum wound drain. The skin was closed with sutures. Operating time is around one hour per procedure. The drain was removed one day post-operatively.

After three months a clinical and colour duplex ultrasonography investigation (Acuson Aspen, Acuson Corporation, Mountain View CA, USA) were carried out to detect lymphatic complications. After seven years a clinical and colour duplex ultrasonography investigation were carried out to detect and describe type and extent of neorevascularisation for the patients of all three treatment arms.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

Clinical outcome and duplex sonography outcome at three months
VDS: venous disability score
VCSS: venous clinical severity score

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Clinical outcome and duplex sonography outcome at seven years
VDS: venous disability score
VCSS: venous clinical severity score

Completion date01/06/2010

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexAll
Target sample size at registration36
Key inclusion criteria1. Consecutive randomised patients with re-do surgery for sapheno-femoral incompetence in the groin
2. Written informed consent
3. Adults greater than 16 years old, either sex
Key exclusion criteriaDoes not want to take part in the study
Date of first enrolment01/04/2002
Date of final enrolment01/06/2010

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Switzerland

Study participating centre

Krankenhausstrasse 12
Thun
3600
Switzerland

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes