Randomised controlled trial: groin hernia repair with titanium coated mesh compared to prolene mesh

ISRCTN ISRCTN36979348
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN36979348
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
13/11/2007
Registration date
14/01/2008
Last edited
15/09/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Digestive System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Angelica Koch
Scientific

Djurgardsg 58
Linkoping
582 29
Sweden

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled clinical trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study objectivesLightweight titanium-coated mesh gives a faster time of convalescence and return to work and normal activity compared to standard heavyweight mesh prolene.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received from the Ethics Committee of (Forskningsetikkommitten) University Hospital on the 3rd December 2005 (ref: 03-428).
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPrimary unilateral inguinal hernia in men
InterventionA tension free repair using the Lichtenstein technique is performed, with local anaesthetics administered into the wound peroperatively.The basic principle is one unit, one surgeon, one method, and two meshes (randomised):
1. Lightweight titanium-coated mesh
2. Heavyweight prolene mesh

All operations are done in the same outpatient clinic under general anaesthesia. The surgeon is highly specialised, performing more than 500 hernia repairs a year and has over 30 years of operative experience.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureShort-term convalescence, is evaluated by using a validated questionnaire in form of a diary assessing postoperative symptoms and recovery at rest and some other activities, which the patients after completion return by mail. It includes Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (worst imaginable pain) to estimate preoperative pain, and experienced pain on day 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 weeks after the operation. It also includes questions about time to return to work and normal activity.
Secondary outcome measuresOne-year follow-up results:
1. Testicular atrophy, recurrence and chronic pain and discomfort (VAS) are assessed at the clinical visit
2. Quality of life is assessed using the Short Health Scale (SHS), regarding the intensity of symptoms, how much worries they cause and how they affect daily life and general well-being
Overall study start date01/02/2004
Completion date30/06/2006

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexMale
Target number of participants300
Key inclusion criteriaMen in the age from 20 to 75 years with an elective Lichtenstein repair of a unilateral primary inguinal hernia were eligible to participate in the study. The patients were recruited and had their surgery in a clinic specialised in elective out-patient operations.
Key exclusion criteriaPatients who were unable to walk 500 metres or unlikely to participate in the follow up (for example owing to language difficulties) were excluded.
Date of first enrolment01/02/2004
Date of final enrolment30/06/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Sweden

Study participating centre

Djurgardsg 58
Linkoping
582 29
Sweden

Sponsor information

State Health Care in Ostergotland County (Landstingen i Ostergotland) (Sweden)
Government

S:t Larsg 49 B
Linkoping
582 24
Sweden

Phone +46 (0)13 222000
Email landstinget@lio.se
Website http://www.lio.se

Funders

Funder type

Government

State Health Care in Ostergotland County (Landstingen i Ostergotland) (Sweden)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article Results 01/10/2008 Yes No