How accurate is 3d dental scanning in measuring gum thickness compared to other common methods?

ISRCTN ISRCTN47332588
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN47332588
Secondary identifying numbers EK Nr:1132/2011
Submission date
17/07/2025
Registration date
11/09/2025
Last edited
11/09/2025
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Oral Health
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
This study aims to find out how accurately cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) - a 3D dental scanning technique - can measure gum thickness compared to other widely used methods like bone sounding, using an ultrasonic probe, or a digital caliper. Accurately measuring gum thickness is important for planning dental treatments such as implants, orthodontics, and gum surgery.

Who can participate?
Adults (18 years and older) who are scheduled for oral surgery (for example, root resection or dental implant therapy) at the University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna

What does the study involve?
Participants undergo gum thickness measurements at a specific point on their gum using four different techniques:
1. CBCT scan (while wearing a special mouth splint for accurate positioning)
2. Bone sounding (after local anesthesia, using a small probe)
3. Ultrasonic probe
4. Digital caliper (after a gum flap is lifted during surgery)
All measurements are taken under standardized conditions before planned surgery.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants may not directly benefit, but the study will help improve gum assessment methods for future dental treatments, making diagnosis and treatment planning easier and less invasive.
All procedures (except the CBCT scan) are part of standard surgical care. The main additional procedure is the CBCT scan, which involves a small increase in radiation exposure, but this is minimized and within dental safety standards. Discomfort during standard gum measurements is minor and brief.

Where is the study run from?
Medical University of Vienna (Austria)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2012 to July 2012

Who is funding the study?
Medical University of Vienna (Austria)

Who is the main contact?
Prof. Gabriella Dvorak, gabriella.dvorak@meduniwien.ac.at

Contact information

Dr Selma Dervisbegovic
Public, Scientific

Sensengasse 2 A
Vienna
1090
Austria

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0003-3325-013X
Phone +43 (0)1400704720
Email selma.dervisbegovic@meduniwien.ac.at
Prof Gabriella Dvorak
Principal Investigator

Sensengasse 2 A
Vienna
1090
Austria

Phone +43 (0)1400704720
Email gabriella.dvorak@meduniwien.ac.at

Study information

Study designSingle-center diagnostic accuracy study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCross sectional study
Study setting(s)Dental clinic
Study typeDiagnostic
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a participant information sheet
Scientific titleAccuracy of cone beam computed tomography in gingival thickness measurement
Study objectivesAlthough cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is used to evaluate bone volume, it would be beneficial to also measure gingival thickness at the same time. The purpose of this research was to determine whether or not gingival thickness measurement carried out with CBCT is reliable.
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 10/01/2012, Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna (Borschkegasse 8b/6, Wien, 1090, Austria; +43 (0)1 40400 21470; ethik-kom@meduniwien.ac.at), ref: EK Nr: 1132/2011

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedGingival thickness measurement
InterventionGingival thickness at the buccal aspect was assessed using four methods:
1. Cone beam computed tomography
2. Bone sounding
3. Ultrasonic device
4. Digital caliper
Local anaesthesia was administered before all measurements.

Bone sounding was performed immediately after radiography using CBCT with the thermoplastic splint in situ. A thermoplastic splint was positioned in the mouth, hence a measurement point was tagged on the gingiva using a gingival marker pen. Bone sounding was performed to measure the distance to the bony surface.

The gingival thickness was measured immediately after elevation of a mucoperiosteal flap twice from two different investigators with a digital caliper on the marked position.

Within 15 minutes, all four measurement methods were evaluated in a standardized setting and in the order specified in the evaluation process.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureGingival (gum) thickness at the buccal aspect, measured in millimeters using:
1. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)
2. Bone sounding (gold standard/transgingival probing)
3. Ultrasonic probe
4. Digital caliper
All measurements are taken at a single timepoint during preoperative assessment (before any surgical intervention, after local anesthesia, within a 15-minute window per patient)
Secondary outcome measuresThere are no secondary outcome measures
Overall study start date10/01/2012
Completion date30/07/2012

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit90 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants41
Total final enrolment41
Key inclusion criteriaConsecutive patients requiring surgical dental procedures (e.g., root resection or implant placement) involving flap elevation
Key exclusion criteria1. Pregnant women
2. Lactating women
3. Patients below the age of 18 years
Date of first enrolment01/02/2012
Date of final enrolment15/07/2012

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Austria

Study participating centre

University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna
Sensengasse 2 A
Vienna
1090
Austria

Sponsor information

Funders

Funder type

Not defined

Medizinische Universität Wien
Government organisation / Local government
Alternative name(s)
Medical University of Vienna, MediUni Wien
Location
Austria

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date01/10/2025
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryData sharing statement to be made available at a later date
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a peer-reviewed journal
IPD sharing planThe data-sharing plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date

Editorial Notes

17/07/2025: Study's existence confirmed by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna.