Evaluation of treatment of local bladder cancer with Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG). Is treatment follow up in the outpatient department just as good as follow up in the operating theatre?

ISRCTN ISRCTN48222814
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN48222814
Protocol serial number UOF no 3
Sponsor Frederiksberg Hospital (Denmark)
Funder Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen University (Denmark)
Submission date
09/09/2011
Registration date
20/01/2012
Last edited
20/01/2012
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Gregers G Hermann
Scientific

Department of Urology
Frederiksberg Hospital
Ndr Fasanvej 57
Copenhagen
DK-2000
Denmark

Email gregershermann@frh.regionh.dk

Study information

Primary study designObservational
Study designSingle center study
Secondary study designNon randomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleDetection rate of carcinoma in situ (CIS) after intravesical Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in fluorescence guided flexible cystoscopy in the outpatient department (OPD) compared to fluorescence guided cystoscopy in rigid cystoscopes in the operating theatre (OT).
Study acronymUOF3
Study objectivesFluorescence guided cystoscopy and biopsy performed in the OPD is just as good as fluorescence guided cystoscopy and biopsy in rigid scopes in the operating theatre to evaluate the efficacy of intra vesical BCG therapy of carcinoma in situ.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedCancer of the urinary bladder - carcinoma of the bladder - CIS
InterventionFluorescence guided cystoscopy and biopsy in rigid scopes in the operating theatre and in flexible cystoscopes in the outpatient department
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

Histological diagnosis from evaluation of bladder biopsy

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Quality of life and pain in relation to test procedures

Completion date30/04/2013

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexAll
Target sample size at registration30
Key inclusion criteriaPatients who have had 6 weekly BCG bladder instillations as treatment of primary or secondary carcinoma in situ of the bladder.
Key exclusion criteriaPatients who do not understand Danish or who the investigators do not find able to fulfil the study
Date of first enrolment01/12/2011
Date of final enrolment30/04/2013

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Denmark

Study participating centre

Department of Urology
Copenhagen
DK-2000
Denmark

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes