The British Antibiotic and Silver Impregnated Catheters for ventriculoperitoneal Shunts multi-centre randomised control trial

ISRCTN ISRCTN49474281
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN49474281
Protocol serial number Version 2.0; HTA 10/104/30
Sponsor Alder Hey Children's Hospital Foundation Trust (UK)
Funder Health Technology Assessment Programme: 10/104/30
Submission date
11/12/2012
Registration date
17/12/2012
Last edited
06/02/2023
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nervous System Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims:
Two new devices have been introduced to try to reduce shunt infection; Bactiseal and Silverline shunts. This study will compare these new shunts to standard shunts. Our goal is to establish which provides most protection against infection and to ensure standardisation of care.

Who can participate?
Children and adults with newly diagnosed hydrocephalus.

What does the study involve?
Patients will be randomly chosen to receive either standard, Bactiseal or Silverline shunts. The patient will have a follow up every three months via the telephone and a questionnaire by post.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There will be no immediate direct benefit to those taking part. But there should be benefits to future patients requiring this treatment as they will potentially have reduced shunt infection.
The main risk of infection is complications for the patients which can leads to prolonged hospital stay, multiple operations and reduced IQ.

Where is the study run from?
Alder Hey Children’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.

When is study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
Recruitment will start in early 2013, for 2 years. Patients will be followed up for a maximum of 2.5 years.

Who is funding the study?
National Institute of Health Research – Health Technology Assessment Programme

Who is the main contact?
Mr Tom Kearns
thomas.kearns@liv.ac.uk

Contact information

Mr Conor Mallucci
Scientific

Alder Hey Childrens NHS Foundation Trust
Eaton Road
Liverpool
L12 2AP
United Kingdom

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designThree-arm multi-centre phase III randomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleNational three-arm, double blind multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing Bactiseal (antibiotic-impregnated), Silverline (silver-impregnated) and standard (non-impregnated) VPS in patients with newly diagnosed hydrocephalus undergoing insertion of their first permanent shunt
Study acronymBASICS
Study objectivesShunt failure due to infection has plagued this neurosurgical advance ever since it was developed. The incidence of shunt infection varies markedly in the literature from 3-27% (2-6) and is higher in certain groups, e.g. neonates and children under 1 year old, patients treated with a previous temporary external ventricular drain (EVD). Episodes of shunt infection have a significant impact on patients and the NHS and require prolonged inpatient hospitalisation, additional surgery to remove the infected hardware, placement of a temporary EVD, intravenous and intrathecal antibiotics, and further surgery to place a new shunt once the infection has been treated. Other clinical consequences of infection including epilepsy, reduced IQ and loculation have often been reported but never formally studied in the context of a prospective clinical trial. This trial thus addresses the primary question of which shunt catheter is most effective in reducing shunt infection and also has secondary questions addressing the consequences of infection in a clinical and financial context.

More details can be found here: http://www.hta.ac.uk/project/2902.asp
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedNewly diagnosed hydrocephalus
InterventionWe will randomly allocate patients to a standard non impregnated ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS), a
Silverline (Silver impregnated) VPS or a Bactiseal (antiobiotic impregnated) VPS on a ratio of 1:1:1. All VPS
used for the trial are CE marked medical devices being used for their intended purpose.
Intervention typeDevice
PhasePhase III
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)
Primary outcome measure(s)

Early infection (within 6 months) following insertion of the first de novo VPS

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

1. The proportion of delayed VPS infections (occurring > 6 months following de novo insertion)
2. Which organisms and their resistance/sensitivities, subsequently infect these three alternative VPS
3. The clinical impact of each VPS infection
4. The infection rate following the first (non-infected) clean VPS revision for mechanical failure
5. The cost-effectiveness and health economics of antibiotic and silver impregnated VPS compared to standard VPS
6. The diagnostics of suspected shunt infections through molecular diagnostic approaches

Completion date01/08/2013

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexAll
Target sample size at registration1200
Total final enrolment1605
Key inclusion criteria1. Newly diagnosed hydrocephalus of any aetiology (including idiopathic intracranial hypertension)
2. VPS is the primary treatment option
3. Clear CSF sample at the time of shunt insertion
3.1. Failed primary endosopic third ventriculostomy allowed
3.2. Previous indwelling ventricular access device (e.g. Ommaya or Rickham reservoir or similar) allowed
3.3. Previous indwelling EVD allowed
Key exclusion criteria1. Previous indwelling VPS
2. Active and on-going CSF or peritoneal infection
3. Multi-loculated hydrocephalus requiring multiple VPS or neuro-endoscopy
4. Ventriculo-atrial or ventriculo-pleural shunt planned
5. Allergy to antibiotics associated with the antibiotic shunt
Date of first enrolment01/03/2013
Date of final enrolment01/08/2013

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England
  • Ireland

Study participating centre

Alder Hey Childrens NHS Foundation Trust
Liverpool
L12 2AP
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summary
IPD sharing planNot provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 26/10/2019 17/09/2019 Yes No
Results article results 01/03/2020 03/04/2020 Yes No
Results article Post hoc analysis 01/02/2023 06/02/2023 Yes No
Protocol article protocol 03/01/2014 Yes No
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes
Study website Study website 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes

Editorial Notes

06/02/2023: Publication reference added.
03/04/2020: Publication reference added.
17/09/2019: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.
01/03/2019: Internal review.
03/10/2018: No publications found, verifying study status with principal investigator.