A study looking at a urine test combined with ultrasound to detect bladder cancer in people with blood in their urine

ISRCTN ISRCTN50547972
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN50547972
Sponsor The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University
Funder Science and Technology Bureau of Jiaxing City
Submission date
27/04/2026
Registration date
27/04/2026
Last edited
20/07/2026
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Haematuria (blood in the urine) is a common symptom that can be a sign of bladder cancer. Currently, the standard way to diagnose bladder cancer is a procedure called cystoscopy, which involves inserting a camera into the bladder through the urethra. This test is invasive, uncomfortable, and expensive.
The aim of this study is to see whether a new urine test (called UroCAD), either on its own or combined with a simple ultrasound scan of the bladder, can accurately detect bladder cancer in people with haematuria. If successful, this non‑invasive approach might help some patients avoid unnecessary cystoscopies.

Who can participate?
Adults (aged 18 years or older) who have recurrent haematuria. This includes people with visible (gross) blood in the urine that comes and goes without pain, after kidney problems have been ruled out, and people with persistent microscopic blood in the urine (found on a urine test) for more than 6 months, after a urinary tract infection has been excluded.

What does the study involve?
Each participant will provide a one‑off morning urine sample (30–50 ml) for UroCAD testing. This test looks for certain DNA changes (chromosomal instability) in cells shed from the bladder lining. Participants will also have a standard bladder ultrasound scan. Finally, they will undergo a cystoscopy with biopsy or surgery to obtain tissue for a definite diagnosis (the reference standard). The study compares the results of the UroCAD test and the ultrasound with the tissue diagnosis to see how accurate the non‑invasive tests are.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There is no direct benefit to participants in this study, but the information gathered will help doctors develop better, less invasive tests for bladder cancer in the future.
Risks are very low. The urine test and ultrasound are painless and have no known health risks. Cystoscopy and biopsy are standard clinical procedures that carry a small risk of discomfort, bleeding, or urinary infection – these risks are the same for participants as for any patient undergoing these procedures outside the study.

Where is the study run from?
The study is led by the Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China. It also involves several other hospitals in the Jiaxing area (the First People’s Hospital of Jiashan and the First People’s Hospital of Pinghu).

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2024 to July 2025

Who is funding the study?
The study is funded by a grant from the Science and Technology Project Plan of Jiaxing (grant number 2024AY10005) (China)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Chenye Tang, john99233@126.com

Contact information

Dr Chenye Tang
Public, Scientific, Principal investigator

Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, 1518 North Huancheng Road
Jiaxing
314000
China

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-8640-197X
Phone +86 (0)13750781238
Email john99233@126.com

Study information

Primary study designObservational
Observational study designCohort study
Scientific titleProspective evaluation of UroCAD combined with ultrasonography for detecting bladder urothelial carcinoma in patients with hematuria
Study acronymPECUS
Study objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of urinary exfoliated‑cell chromosomal copy‑number aberration detection (UroCAD), alone and in combination with bladder ultrasonography, for detecting bladder urothelial carcinoma in patients presenting with hematuria, using histopathological examination as the reference standard.
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 25/12/2023, Medical Ethics Committee of Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University (1518 North Huancheng Road, Jiaxing, 314000, China; +86 (0)573 82050475; jxeykjk1003@163.com), ref: 2023 ZFYJ 134 01

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedBladder urothelial carcinoma in patients presenting with hematuria
MethodologyThis prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study consecutively enrolls adult patients presenting with recurrent hematuria. Participants provide a midstream first morning urine sample (30–50 ml) for UroCAD testing, which uses low‑coverage whole‑genome sequencing (LC‑WGS) to detect chromosomal instability (CIN) and genome‑wide copy‑number variation (CNV) profiles in exfoliated urothelial cells. All participants also undergo bladder ultrasonography, performed by radiologists blinded to the UroCAD results. The reference standard is histopathological examination of bladder tissue obtained via cystoscopy or surgical resection. The diagnostic performance of UroCAD alone, ultrasonography alone, and two prespecified combined rules (“CIN or ultrasound” and “CIN and ultrasound”) is evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, overall accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Secondary analyses assess the association between CNV burden and tumor stage, as well as the discriminative ability of individual chromosomal arms. No randomisation or intervention allocation is applied.
Intervention typeMixed
Primary outcome measure(s)
  1. Diagnostic performance of UroCAD alone and in combination with ultrasonography: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), overall accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) measured using histopathological examination of bladder tissue obtained via cystoscopy or surgical resection as the reference standard, at a single timepoint at enrollment (cross-sectional assessment; no follow-up required for primary outcome)
Key secondary outcome measure(s)
Completion date04/07/2025

Eligibility

Participant type(s)
Age groupMixed
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit99 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration160
Total final enrolment153
Key inclusion criteria1. Age ≥18 years
2. Recurrent hematuria, including either:
2.1. Intermittent, painless, gross hematuria after renal causes have been ruled out by nephrology consultation; or
2.2. Persistent microscopic hematuria for >6 months confirmed by urinalysis, following exclusion of urinary tract infection
3. Able to provide a midstream first-morning urine sample (30–50 mL) for UroCAD testing
4. Willing and able to undergo cystoscopy and histopathological examination (or surgical resection for pathological confirmation) as the reference standard
5. Provide written informed consent to participate
Key exclusion criteria1. Unwillingness to provide a urine sample
2. Refusal to participate or inability to provide informed consent
3. Prior history of other non-urothelial malignancies
4. Incomplete clinical records
Date of first enrolment14/01/2024
Date of final enrolment01/06/2025

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • China

Study participating centres

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article 19/07/2026 20/07/2026 Yes No

Editorial Notes

20/07/2026: Publication reference added.
27/04/2026: Study's existence confirmed by the Medical Ethics Committee of Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University