ACCURE-UK 2: the effects of appendix removal on ulcerative colitis

ISRCTN ISRCTN60945764
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN60945764
IRAS number 254954
Secondary identifying numbers CPMS 40580, IRAS 254954
Submission date
12/08/2019
Registration date
03/09/2019
Last edited
16/04/2025
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Digestive System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a form of inflammatory bowel disease. Symptoms of the disease include diarrhoea, abdominal pain and an increase in the need to use the toilet. Patients can go for months with no, or very mild symptoms (remission) and then suffer a flare-up (relapse) where symptoms become much more severe; hospital treatment can become necessary in the worse cases. There is some evidence that the appendix has a role in the regulation of inflammation within the bowel, and that removing the appendix (appendicectomy, also commonly known as appendectomy in Europe/the US) may have a positive impact on how active UC is. Results from a previous study also show that appendicectomy is safe and attractive to patients and their doctors and had better outcomes. However, the study was not designed to be large enough to prove any definite benefit. This study is a larger clinical study to complement a study currently being carried out in The Netherlands using the same design and study procedures. This will allow the researchers to combine their findings with the Dutch group in one large analysis, thereby obtaining a more robust result and in a more timely fashion. The overall aim of the research is to find out whether removing the appendix (appendicectomy) can reduce the chances of a patient experiencing further flare-ups of their Ulcerative Colitis (UC) in the future months.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 or over with proven ulcerative colitis who have experienced a flare-up of disease symptoms within the last 12 months, but with currently little or no disease activity (remission)

What does the study involve?
First, patients are checked to see if they are in remission by examining the large bowel with a camera (endoscopy) and/or testing a stool sample (faeces) for signs of inflammation (faecal calprotectin test). If the patient agrees to participate in the study, they are asked to sign a consent form and then asked to complete questionnaires about their quality of life. They are asked to complete the same questionnaires every 3 months for 1 year. The participant is then randomly allocated to either the appendicectomy group or the ‘control’ or comparison group. Those in the appendicectomy group have an operation to remove their appendix, continuing with their usual medication(s). Those in the control group simply continue with their usual medication(s). After this stage, follow-up involves regular reviews to discuss symptoms and complete further questionnaires. These reviews are scheduled to take place at around 6 weeks (appendicectomy group only for standard post-operative checks), 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after entry to the study and take place in hospital at outpatient clinics. However, the reviews at 3, 6 and 9 months may be done over the telephone. At the end of the trial (12 months) participants are asked to undergo one final camera examination of their bowel. If during the 12 months periods, the participant feels they are developing symptoms of a flare, they are asked to contact the research team at their hospital to arrange an urgent review, and possibly blood tests and a camera examination of the bowel.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
For participants in the control group, there will be no disadvantages from a medical point of view as they will receive standard treatment with medications as they would anyway. Additionally, the reviews planned every 3 months throughout the trial (with the exception of the final 12-month review) can be completed over the phone if visit the outpatient clinics are not always convenient. The only additional burdens are the camera tests at the beginning and end of the study. In addition, the appendicectomy group will have an operation, which is an additional treatment compared to the routine care of patients with UC. Like any surgery there is always the possibility of complications. The researchers have done their best to reduce the chances of these by ensuring that only experienced and specialised colorectal consultant surgeons undertake operations during the trial. All adverse events relating to the operations within the study will be carefully recorded as this is important information to know if this operation is offered more widely to UC patients. For participants in the control group, there is unlikely to be any personal benefit from taking part in the trial, although they will undergo a period of careful disease and medical treatment monitoring. Some patients will draw satisfaction from the knowledge that their involvement, in either group, will help determine if this new proposed treatment has the potential to benefit all patients affected by UC. For the appendicectomy group, if the operation does prove to have an impact on the disease activity in UC, there may be a potential benefit to an individual patient in taking part in terms of reducing the number or severity of disease relapses. This may in turn impact upon the future use of medication, number of hospital admissions and the need for major bowel surgery.

Where is the study run from?
The study will run across the UK including at least 10 hospitals including in Birmingham, Leicester, Cambridge, Sheffield and London.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
May 2019 to April 2024

Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR): Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) Programme (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Manjinder Kaur, m.kaur@bham.ac.uk

Study website

Contact information

Mrs Manjinder Kaur
Public

Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit
Public Health Building
University of Birmingham
Birmingham
B29 2TT
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-3412-0276
Phone +44 (0)121 414 9104
Email m.kaur@bham.ac.uk
Prof Thomas Pinkney
Scientific

Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit
Public Health Building
University of Birmingham
Birmingham
B29 2TT
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-7320-6673
Phone +44 (0)121 414 9012
Email thomas.pinkney@uhb.nhs.uk
Miss Ruth Evans
Public

Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit
Public Health Building
University of Birmingham
Birmingham
B29 2TT
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)121 414 9012
Email accure@trials.bham.ac.uk

Study information

Study designMulti-centre phase 3 two-arm outcome-assessor blinded prospective randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/documents/college-mds/trials/bctu/accure-uk2/accure-uk-2-patient-information-sheet-v5.0-07-dec-21.pdf
Scientific titleAn international multicentre randomised controlled trial to assess the effect of Appendectomy on the Clinical Course of ulcerative colitis; UK arm
Study acronymACCURE-UK 2
Study hypothesisAppendicectomy will result in an improved clinical course in UC compared to those undergoing standard care, with an increased chance of maintaining remission and an associated improvement in overall symptoms.
Ethics approval(s)Approved 29/07/2019, East Midlands - Leicester South Research Ethics Committee (The Old Chapel, Royal Standard Place, Nottingham, NG1 6FS, UK; Tel: +44 (0)207 104 8109; +44 (0)207 104 8036; Email: NRESCommittee.EastMidlands-LeicesterSouth@nhs.net), ref: 19/EM/0191
ConditionUlcerative colitis
InterventionCurrent intervention as of 27/10/2021:
This UK study will recruit up to 90 UC patients currently in disease remission and randomly allocate them into one of two groups, the appendicectomy group or the control group. Those in the control group take their standard tablet medication as usual. Those in the appendicectomy group also take their usual medication but they also undergo an appendicectomy. All patients will then be followed up for one year with information about disease activity, medication use, health-related quality of life, health resource usage obtained.


Previous intervention:
This UK study will recruit 90 UC patients currently in disease remission and randomly allocate them into one of two groups, the appendicectomy group or the control group. Those in the control group take their standard tablet medication as usual. Those in the appendicectomy group also take their usual medication but they also undergo an appendicectomy. All patients will then be followed up for one year with information about disease activity, medication use, health-related quality of life, health resource usage obtained.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureCurrent primary outcome measure as of 27/10/2021:
One-year UC relapse rate (defined both clinically and endoscopically as Mayo score ≥5 with endoscopy subscore of 2 or 3), or in absence of endoscopy based on review by an independent critical event committee of clinical information suggesting relapse such as exacerbation of symptoms and rectal bleeding or FCP>150 (> 4 weeks after surgery) or intensified medical therapy other than 5-ASA therapy.


Previous primary outcome measure:
One-year UC relapse rate (defined both clinically and endoscopically as Mayo score ≥5 with endoscopy subscore of 2 or 3)
Secondary outcome measuresCurrent secondary outcome measures as of 29/03/2023:

1. Number of relapses per patient at 12 months
2. Time to first relapse (defined as time between randomisation in the control group or laparoscopic appendectomy in the intervention group and, the first day of clinical symptoms of an endoscopically or clinically confirmed relapse)
3. Health-related quality of life and costs measured using (EQ-5D-3L, EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL and IBDQ at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-randomisation
4. Disease activity, as measured with the Mayo score at 12 months or relapse (if earlier)
5. Colectomy rate at 12 months
6. Resource usage, including medication usage, diagnostic tests undergone outside of the trial (laboratory work, radiological and endoscopic assessments), inpatient costs and health professional interactions

_____

Previous secondary outcome measures as of 27/10/2021:

1. Number of relapses per patient at 12 months
2. Time to first relapse (defined as time between randomisation in the control group or laparoscopic appendectomy in the intervention group and, the first day of clinical symptoms of an endoscopically or clinically confirmed relapse)
3. Health-related quality of life and costs measured using (EQ-5D-3L, EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL and IBDQ at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-randomisation
4. Disease activity measured with the Mayo score at 12 months or relapse
5. Colectomy rate at 12 months
6. Resource usage, including medication usage, diagnostic tests undergone outside of the trial (laboratory work, radiological and endoscopic assessments), inpatient costs and health professional interactions

_____

Previous secondary outcome measures:

1. Number of relapses per patient at 12 months
2. Time to first relapse
3. Health-related quality of life and costs measured using (EQ-5D-3L, EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL and IBDQ at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-randomisation
4. Disease activity measured with the Mayo score at 12 months or relapse
5. Colectomy rate at 12 months
6. Resource usage, including medication usage, diagnostic tests undergone outside of the trial (laboratory work, radiological and endoscopic assessments), inpatient costs and health professional interactions
Overall study start date01/05/2019
Overall study end date22/04/2024

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 272
Total final enrolment201
Participant inclusion criteriaCurrent inclusion criteria as of 29/03/2023:

1. Histologically confirmed Ulcerative Colitis
2. Disease relapse within 12 months prior to randomisation medically treated until remission
3. In clinical remission at time of randomisation with partial Mayo score less than 3 and presumptive endoscopic Mayo subscore of 0 or 1, identified by either:
3.1. Colonoscopy (within 3 months) examining the full length of the colon and rectum
3.2. Sigmoidoscopy (within 3 months) examining the last part of the colon (sigmoid and rectum) with faecal calprotectin less than 150 ug/g (within 3 months)
3.3 FCP less than 150 µg/g (within 3 months) with a personal history of raised FCP levels (>500 µg/g) during a previous disease flare-up at any stage
4. Aged 18 or over
5. Patient able and willing to give written informed consent

_____

Previous participant inclusion criteria as of 27/10/2021:

1. Histologically confirmed Ulcerative Colitis
2. Disease relapse within 12 months of randomisation medically treated until remission
3. In clinical remission at time of randomisation with partial Mayo score less than 3 and presumptive endoscopic Mayo subscore of 0 or 1, identified by either:
3.1. Colonoscopy (within 3 months) examining the full length of the colon and rectum
3.2. Sigmoidoscopy (within 3 months) examining the last part of the colon (sigmoid and rectum) with faecal calprotectin less than 150 ug/g
3.3 FCP less than 150 µg/g (within 3 months) with a personal history of raised FCP levels (>500 µg/g) during a previous disease flare-up at any stage
4. Aged 18 or over
5. Patient able and willing to give written informed consent

_____

Previous participant inclusion criteria:

1. Histologically confirmed Ulcerative Colitis
2. Disease relapse within 12 months of randomisation medically treated until remission
3. In clinical remission at time of randomisation with partial Mayo score less than 3 and presumptive endoscopic Mayo subscore of 0 or 1, identified by endoscopy (within 3 months). The endoscopy will be either:
3.1. Colonoscopy examining the full length of the colon and rectum
3.2. Sigmoidoscopy examining the last part of the colon (sigmoid and rectum) with faecal calprotectin less than 150 ug/g
4. Aged 18 or over
5. Patient able and willing to give written informed consent
Participant exclusion criteriaCurrent participant exclusion criteria as of 27/10/2021:
1. Previous appendicectomy or other major abdominal surgery precluding safe laparoscopic appendicectomy
2. Any suspicion of Crohn’s disease
3. Disease recently treated with biologicals (within 3 months of randomisation)
4. Patients with significant comorbidity (e.g. unstable heart failure, liver or kidney failure, major lung co-morbidity)


Previous participant exclusion criteria:
1. Previous appendicectomy or other major abdominal surgery precluding safe laparoscopic appendicectomy
2. Any suspicion of Crohn’s disease
3. Disease recently treated with biologicals (within 3 months of randomisation)
4. Severe disease ever treated with biologicals and stopped due to secondary non-response
5. Toxic megacolon or severe ongoing active colitis at time of randomisation
6. Patients with significant comorbidity (e.g. unstable heart failure, liver or kidney failure, major lung co-morbidity)
Recruitment start date03/09/2019
Recruitment end date01/09/2022

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centres

Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Mindelsohn Way
Birmingham
B15 2WB
United Kingdom
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Bordesley Green East
Birmingham
B9 5ST
United Kingdom
Leicester Royal Infirmary
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Infirmary Square
Leicester
LE1 5WW
United Kingdom
St Marks Hospital
London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust
Watford Road
Harrow
HA1 3UJ
United Kingdom
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
United Kingdom
Northern General Hospital
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Herries Road
Sheffield
S5 7AU
United Kingdom
Medway Maritime Hosptial
Medway NHS Foundation Trust
Windmill Road
Gillingham
ME7 5NY
United Kingdom
Queen's Medical Centre
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Derby Road
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
1345 Govan Road
Glasgow
G51 4TF
United Kingdom
Conquest Hospital
East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
The Ridge
St Leonards-on-Sea
Hastings
TN37 7RD
United Kingdom
New Cross Hospital
Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust
Wolverhampton Road
Wolverhampton
WV10 0QP
United Kingdom
University Hospital of North Tees
North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust
Hardwick Road
Stockton on Tees
TS19 8PE
United Kingdom
Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Countess of Chester Health Park
Liverpool Road
Chester
CH2 1UL
United Kingdom
Wythenshawe Hospital
Southmoor Road
Wythenshawe
Manchester
M23 9LT
United Kingdom
Bristol Royal Infirmary
Marlborough Street
Bristol
BS2 8HW
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Birmingham
University/education

c/o Dr Birgit Whitman
Room 117
Aston Webb Building
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)121 415 8011
Email researchgovernance@contacts.bham.ac.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03angcq70

Funders

Funder type

Government

NIHR Evaluation, Trials and Studies Co-ordinating Centre (NETSCC); Grant Codes: 16/61/35

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date30/11/2024
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planThe protocol is available on the ACCURE-UK 2 website (https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/ACCURE-UK2). The findings will be published in international medical journals, publicised on the trial website and presented at relevant conferences.
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Dr Laura Magill (e.l.magill@bham.ac.uk). Access to available anonymised data may be granted following review.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol (other) 5.0 07/12/2021 29/03/2023 No No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No
Statistical Analysis Plan 26/03/2024 27/03/2024 No No
Results article 11/04/2025 16/04/2025 Yes No

Editorial Notes

16/04/2025: Publication reference added.
16/10/2024: The total final enrolment was changed from 202 to 201.
15/10/2024: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The overall end date was changed from 01/11/2023 to 22/04/2024.
2. The intention to publish date was changed from 31/10/2024 to 30/11/2024.
3. The plain English summary was updated to reflect these changes.
27/03/2024: Statistical analysis plan publication reference added.
30/03/2023: Internal review.
29/03/2023: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The secondary outcome measures were changed.
2. The link to the participant information sheet was updated.
3. The inclusion criteria were changed.
4. The total final enrolment was added.
5. The IRAS number was added.
6. A link to the protocol file was added.
7. The contact details were changed.
03/10/2022: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The recruitment end date was changed from 01/07/2022 to 01/09/2022.
2. The trial participating centres University Hospital of North Tees, Countess of Chester Hospital, Wythenshawe Hospital, Bristol Royal Infirmary were added.
3. A contact was added.
27/10/2021: Recruitment for this study is no longer paused and the following changes have been made:
1. The recruitment end date has been changed from 01/07/2020 to 01/07/2022.
2. The overall trial end date has been changed from 01/11/2021 to 01/11/2023 and the plain English summary has been updated to reflect this change.
3. The intention to publish date has been changed from 31/10/2022 to 31/10/2024.
4. The intervention has been updated.
5. The primary outcome measure has been updated.
6. The secondary outcome measures have been updated.
7. The participant information sheet has been added.
8. The participant inclusion criteria have been updated.
9. The participant exclusion criteria have been updated.
10. The trial participating centres "Medway Maritime Hosptial", "Queen's Medical Centre", "Queen Elizabeth University Hospital", "Conquest Hospital", and "New Cross Hospital" have been added.
16/04/2020: Due to current public health guidance, recruitment for this study has been paused.
12/08/2019: Trial's existence confirmed by the NIHR.