A prospective randomized trial investigating lower incisor inclination and mandibular arch dimensional changes of two pre-adjusted edgewise orthodontic bracket systems in non-extraction cases

ISRCTN ISRCTN67900267
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN67900267
Secondary identifying numbers N0205186777
Submission date
28/09/2007
Registration date
28/09/2007
Last edited
11/10/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Oral Health
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Robert T Lee
Scientific

Orthodontics
Dental Institute
New Road
Whitechapel
London
E1 1BB
United Kingdom

Phone +44 020 7377 7397
Email r.t.lee@qmul.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study hypothesisIn the UK most orthodontic treatment is carried out using fixed appliances or 'braces'. The first phase of fixed appliance orthodontic treatment is concerned principally with tooth alignment. Conventional fixed orthodontic brackets are cemented onto the teeth and attached to an arch wire using elastic ligatures. The teeth are then aligned using forces generated by the arch wire itself. Recently a ligature-free bracket system has been introduced. It has been suggested that reduced friction associated with this system can provide considerable benefits to the patient, principally because the teeth align more rapidly. We propose to investigate the nature of alignment of two fixed orthodontic bracket systems: Smart-Clip self ligating and Ormco Synthesis conventional siamese.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
ConditionOral Health: Orthodontics
InterventionSmart-Clip® ligature free brackets vs conventional pre-adjusted edgewise brackets (3M Unitek).
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureThe ability of two fixed appliance orthodontic bracket systems to align crowded lower incisors. In particular lower incisor inclination and arch form changes will be compared.
Null hypothesis: there is no difference in lower incisor inclination, and angulation, and lower arch dimensions using self-ligating and conventional pre-adjusted edgewise brackets.
Secondary outcome measuresNo secondary outcome measures
Overall study start date22/09/2006
Overall study end date21/05/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Upper age limit18 Years
SexNot Specified
Target number of participants20
Participant inclusion criteria1. Patients should be fit and well and not currently on any medication or suffering from any craniofacial syndrome. Medication could theoretically affect the connective tissues that remodel during orthodontic treatment
2. Children under 18 years
3. Lower incisor tooth crowding of up to 5mm as part of their malocclusion
4. A requirement for fixed orthodontic treatment on a non-extraction basis
5. More severely crowded dentitions often require the loss of premolar teeth to provide the necessary space for alignment of the dental arch
Participant exclusion criteria1. A complete overbite. Complete overbite might be expected to reduce rates of tooth alignment due to bracket interferences.
2. No incisor teeth completely excluded from the dental arch
Recruitment start date22/09/2006
Recruitment end date21/05/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Orthodontics
London
E1 1BB
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2007 Update - Department of Health
Government

The Department of Health, Richmond House, 79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7307 2622
Email dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk
Website http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en

Funders

Funder type

Government

Barts and The London NHS Trust (UK), NHS R&D Support Funding

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/05/2009 Yes No
Results article results 01/09/2009 Yes No