West End Walkers 65+: The feasibility of a pedometer-based walking programme in combination with a physical activity consultation in Scottish adults aged 65 years and over in a primary care setting

ISRCTN ISRCTN70658148
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN70658148
Secondary identifying numbers CZH/4/457
Submission date
05/10/2009
Registration date
30/11/2009
Last edited
13/05/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Prof Nanette Mutrie
Scientific

Department of Sport, Culture and the Arts
University of Strathclyde
76 Southbrae Drive
Glasgow
G13 1PP
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)141 9503371
Email nanette.mutrie@strath.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)GP practice
Study typeNot Specified
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleThe feasibility of a pedometer-based walking programme in combination with a physical activity consultation in Scottish adults aged 65 years and over in a primary care setting: a randomised controlled trial
Study acronymWEW 65+
Study hypothesisWalking has been identified as an ideal mode of exercise to promote physical activity in the general population as well as among older adults. Large knowledge gaps exist on the optimum methods to promote and sustain walking behaviour in older adults. WEW 65+ will investigate the feasibility of a pedometer-based walking programme in combination with a physical activity consultation delivered in primary care. Its target is to help community dwelling older adults aged over 65 years achieve and sustain the physical activity recommendation of 30 minutes of activity at least 5 days of the week. This study will provide evaluative information on recruitment and retention to the study, the feasibility of the intervention and outcome measures that could be useful in designing a definitive randomised controlled trial.

Hypothesis:
Can a pedometer-based walking programme, in combination with a physical activity consultation delivered in a primary care setting increase and maintain walking behaviour among adults aged over 65 years over a 24 week period?
Ethics approval(s)NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Research Ethics Committee, approved on 26/11/2008 (ref: 08/S0701/121)
ConditionPhysical activity in older adults
InterventionParticipants will be randomised into one of two groups: immediate intervention (Group 1) or waiting list control (Group 2). Participants randomised to Group 1 received a 30 minute physical activity consultation with a practice nurse. The participants are given an individualised 12 week walking programme, a pedometer and a booklet containing health advice, walking information and the walking programme. Following the 12 week walking programme, the participants will receive a second individual physical activity consultation focusing on relapse prevention. Participants will receive a written physical activity advice leaflet at this point.

Participants randomised to Group 2 were allocated to a 12 week waiting list and will be requested not to amend their current physical activity levels. After 12 weeks Group 2 received an individualised 12 week walking programme identical to Group 1, a pedometer and a physical activity consultation.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureWalking behaviour will be assessed using pedometer step counts (NL-1000 pedometer) and accelerometer activity counts (ActivPAL Accelerometer). In the intervention group these measures will be assessed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. In the waiting list group these measures will be assessed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months.
Secondary outcome measuresPsychological, including the changes in:
1. Mood: Positive And Negative Affects Scale (PANAS)
2. Loneliness: University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) loneliness scale
3. Motor efficacy: perceived motor efficacy scale
4. Quality of life: SF-36v2™ Health Survey (SF-36v2™)

In the intervention group these questionnaires were completed at baseline and 12 weeks. In the waiting list group the questionnaires were completed at baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 36 weeks.

Qualitative:
Two focus groups will be completed with Group 1 at 12 weeks and 24 weeks (post intervention), one involving high adherers, the other of low adherers. A further two focus groups will be conducted with Group 2 at 24 weeks (post intervention), again one consisting of high adherers, the other of low adherers.
Overall study start date30/11/2008
Overall study end date30/09/2010

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupSenior
SexBoth
Target number of participants46
Participant inclusion criteriaIndependently living men and women aged over 65 years are eligible to enter the trial should they not currently meet the amount of physical activity currently recommended for health benefit.
Participant exclusion criteria1. Refusal to take part
2. Already achieved the physical activity recommendations for this group
3. Unable to walk outside independently
4. Unable to understand the rationale behind the trial
Recruitment start date30/11/2008
Recruitment end date30/09/2010

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Department of Sport, Culture and the Arts
Glasgow
G13 1PP
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Chief Scientist Office (UK)
Government

The Scottish Government
St Andrew's House
Regent Road
Edinburgh
EH1 3DG
United Kingdom

Website http://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/cso/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01bw7zm61

Funders

Funder type

Government

Chief Scientist Office (UK) (grant no: CZH/4/457)
Government organisation / Local government
Alternative name(s)
CSO
Location
United Kingdom
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Research and Development Office (UK) (project ref: WN08CH356)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/12/2012 Yes No