Clinical trial to compare electrical stimulation and the conventional ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) in the treatment of dropped foot following stroke

ISRCTN ISRCTN72463123
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN72463123
Protocol serial number AP0770
Sponsor Action Medical Research (UK)
Funder Action Medical Research (UK)
Submission date
01/03/2001
Registration date
01/03/2001
Last edited
13/09/2016
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Philip Wright
Scientific

Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering
Salisbury District Hospital
Salisbury
SP2 8BJ
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1722 336 262 ext 4686
Email p.wright@salisburyfes.com

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific titleClinical trial to compare electrical stimulation and the conventional ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) in the treatment of dropped foot following stroke
Study objectivesThe aim of this study is to compare functional electrical stimulation (FES) with ankle foot orthosis (AFO) in the treatment of dropped foot following stroke.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedFoot drop
Intervention1. One group treated with AFO
2. Second group with electrical stimulation
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

1. Walking speed (measured over 10 metres and timed by a stopwatch)
2. Physiological Cost Index (PCI)
3. Endurance (the total distance the participant is able to walk without an AFO or FES in 3 minutes)
4. Calf spasticity (measured using the modified Ashworth Scale)
5. Mobility (measured using the Rivermead Mobility Index)

Outcome measures were taken every six weeks.

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Not provided at time of registration

Completion date31/12/2000

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexAll
Target sample size at registration22
Key inclusion criteria1. Single stroke of vascular origin in the last 6 months
2. Inadequate dorsiflexion during the swing phase of gait
3. May be a candidate for ankle-foot orthosis (AFO)
4. Able to walk 10 m
5. Willing to participate
Key exclusion criteria1. Previous use of a dropped foot stimulator or AFO in four weeks prior to start of intervention
2. Required an AFO other than that selected for the trial
Date of first enrolment01/01/1998
Date of final enrolment31/12/2000

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering
Salisbury
SP2 8BJ
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summary
IPD sharing plan

Editorial Notes

13/09/2016: No publications found in PubMed, verifying study status with principal investigator.