Weekly neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN98873899 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN98873899 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT) | NCT00462397 |
| Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) | 2005-000134-20 |
| Protocol serial number | 1517 |
| Sponsor | University College London (UK) |
| Funder | University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK) |
- Submission date
- 29/04/2010
- Registration date
- 29/04/2010
- Last edited
- 10/09/2019
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Cancer
Plain English summary of protocol
Contact information
Scientific
Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre
90 Tottenham Court Road
London
W1T 4TJ
United Kingdom
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Non-randomised interventional treatment trial |
| Secondary study design | Non randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | Phase II non-randomised interventional treatment study of weekly neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer |
| Study acronym | CxII |
| Study objectives | For the past 10 years cisplatin-based chemoradiation (CRT) has been the treatment of choice for all patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. The key CRT trials showed a reduction in the risk of death by 30 - 50% with an absolute improvement in 5 year survival of 12%. However, a large proportion of patients in these trials had early stage disease (stage I, II) so the results may not be broadly applicable to women with more advanced disease/large tumours, or positive nodes. The outlook for such patients remains poor and new approaches are needed. To date, trials addressing the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) have generated conflicting data. Although a meta-analysis of 21 randomised trials failed to show any overall improvement in survival with NACT, an association between outcome and cycle length has been observed. Trials with a cycle length of 14 days or less were associated with an improvement in survival of approximately 7% at 5 years, while longer cycle lengths had a detrimental effect on outcome. Therefore, it is postulated that a short course of dose dense NACT with weekly cycles of treatment prior to definitive CRT might downstage the tumours, lengthen the exposure to systemic treatment and improve outcome. Several cytotoxic agents have shown activity in cervical cancer, however very few of these agents have been tested in the weekly setting. This phase II study will assess the use of neoadjuvant weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiation in 50 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Cambridgeshire 1 Research Ethics Committee approved on the 17/05/2005 (ref: 04/Q0104/163) |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Topic: National Cancer Research Network; Subtopic: Gynaecological Cancer; Disease: Cervix |
| Intervention | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Weekly treatment for six weeks: paclitaxel (80 mg/m^2 IV) followed by carboplatin AUC2 IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36. Chemoradiation: Cisplatin: 40 mg/m^2 (maximum 70 mg) weekly for 6 weeks maximum, commencing in week 7 of treatment regimen (or as soon as blood counts have recovered). Pelvic radiotherapy: 50.4 Gy in 28# over 5.5 weeks High dose rate brachytherapy: 14 Gy in 2# (1 or 2 intracavitary insertions) Pelvic sidewall boost (unilateral or bilateral) for all patients FIGO stage IIb and above with parametrial/pelvic sidewall disease extension, 5.4 Gy in 3# over 3 days. Patient follow-up after treatment: 3 monthly for 2 years Study entry: registration only |
| Intervention type | Drug |
| Phase | Phase II |
| Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s) | Cisplatin |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Overall response to both the neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy and the concomitant chemoradiotherapy. 6 week assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy by clinical examination and MRI pelvis according to RECIST; 12 week assessment after concomitant chemoradiotherapy by clinical examination, MRI pelvis and CT abdomen by RECIST. |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
1. Response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy |
| Completion date | 28/11/2008 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | Female |
| Target sample size at registration | 50 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Histologically confirmed and reviewed at the cancer centre International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage Ib2 - IVa squamous, adeno-, or adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix suitable for radical chemoradiation 2. EUA, cystoscopy and sigmoidoscopy performed by Gynaecological Oncologist +/- Clinical Oncologist to confirm FIGO stage with biopsy of any suspicious lesions in bladder, vagina or rectum 3. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 - 1 4. Age over 18, no upper limit, providing patient deemed fit by supervising oncologist to receive chemoradiation 5. Adequate renal function, as defined by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by EDTA or creatinine clearance (24 hour urine) greater than or equal to 60 ml/min 6. Adequate liver function, as defined by alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) less than 2.5 upper limit of normal (ULN), and bilirubin less than 1.25 ULN 7. Adequate bone marrow function, as defined by white cell count (WCC) greater than 3.0 x 10^9/litre, neutrophils greater than 1.5 x 10^9/litre, and platelets greater than 100 x 10^9/litre 8. Placement of ureteric stents in all patients with hydronephrosis regardless of renal function 9. Normal electrocardiogram (ECG) 10. Written informed consent |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Pregnant or breast feeding patients 2. Previous diagnosis of cancer, except basal cell carcinoma (BCC) skin 3. Active cardiac disease |
| Date of first enrolment | 14/06/2005 |
| Date of final enrolment | 28/11/2008 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
Study participating centre
W1T 4TJ
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 25/06/2013 | Yes | No | |
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
| Plain English results | No | Yes |
Editorial Notes
10/09/2019: ClinicalTrials.gov number added.
19/10/2018: Cancer Research UK lay results summary link added to Results (plain English)
27/11/2015: Publication reference added.