Comparative study of two types of pacing for the treatment of unexplained syncope (vasovagal syndrome)

ISRCTN ISRCTN00029383
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN00029383
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
15/04/2010
Registration date
23/07/2010
Last edited
29/12/2020
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Signs and Symptoms
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Daniel Flammang
Scientific

Croix Rousse University Hospital
103 Grand Rue de la Croix Rousse
Lyon
69004
France

Phone +33 (0)472 072865
Email daniel.flammang@yahoo.fr

Study information

Study designProspective multicentre comparative randomised single blind study with a direct individual benefit
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Can be found at https://www.healthstudies.umn.edu/trc/en/en_protocol-2002-02-21.pdf (see pg. 15-16)
Scientific titleComparative study of two types of pacing for the treatment of unexplained syncope (vasovagal syndrome): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial with a direct individual benefit
Study objectivesTo compare the effectiveness of a dual chamber pacing (DDD) at 70 beats per minute (bpm) and a single chamber atrial pacing (AAI) at 30 bpm in patients suffering from vasovagal syndrome related to a predominant cardio-inhibitory reflex determined by adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) test.

Null hypothesis:
The cumulative percentage syncope recurrence in the 30 bpm AAI-mode stimulated group, rp, equals that in the 70 bpm DDD-mode group, rw. Thus, rp=rw=r0.

Alternative hypothesis: rp=arw, where a =/= 1.
Ethics approval(s)1. The Ethics Committee of Poitiers University approved on the 1st of September 1999 (ref: 99.07.22)
2. Individual ethics committees of each clinical centre
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSyncope (unknown origin)
InterventionATP testing was carried out prior to randomisation. Only patients with block at least 10 seconds in duration were randomised to pacemaker implantation and programming with either:
1. Dual chamber pacing (DDD) at 70 bpm
2. Single chamber atrial pacing (AAI) at 30 bpm
An injection of adenosine triphosphate will be used to screen for cardiac pause.

The implantation is permanent, but the programming was set for the duration of the study to the random assignment. At the end of the study the recommended programming was to the more successful settings in the study, DDD @ 70bpm. The total follow-up was from January 2000 until May 2005.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureRecurrence of syncope
Secondary outcome measures1. Duration of cardiac pause
2. Reprogramming of pacemaker
3. Recurrences after reprogramming
Overall study start date01/07/2000
Completion date31/12/2005

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants200 patients (100 per group)
Total final enrolment80
Key inclusion criteria1. Adult patients (greater than or equal to 18 years), agreeing to take part in the study and having signed the informed consent form
2. Patients having presented one or more episodes of syncope or pre-syncope unexplained by the usual screening tests: questionnaire, clinical examination, orthostatic hypotension investigation, biological tests, electrophysiological study (if necessary), echocardiogram (ECG), Holter, exercise test (optional), electroencephalogram (EEG) (optional), and brain scan (optional)
3. Negative sino-carotid massage (SCM)
4. Head-up tilt test conducted according to Appendix B protocol, whatever the result
5. Positive adenosine-5'-triphospate (ATP) test, confirmed by double reading by principal investigator
Key exclusion criteria1. Syncope etiology revealed by usual screening testings
2. Positive SCM
3. Atrial or ventricular tachyarrhythmia
4. Defibrillator implanted (DAI)
5. Pacemaker previously implanted
6. Patient on waiting list for or having had heart transplantation
7. Sick sinus syndrome, brady-tachy syndrome
8. Atrial fibrillation, paroxysmal or permanent first and second-degree atrio-ventricular block, trifascicular block
9. Ongoing pregnancy. Women of childbearing age should be using reliable contraception.
10. Acute systemic infection or other surgical contra-indication for pacemaker implantation
11. Chronic obstructive bronchopneumopathy
12. Asthma
13. Diabetes
Date of first enrolment01/07/2000
Date of final enrolment31/12/2005

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Belgium
  • France

Study participating centre

Croix Rousse University Hospital
Lyon
69004
France

Sponsor information

Croix Rousse University Hospital (France)
Hospital/treatment centre

Department of Cardiology
103 Grand Rue de la Croix Rousse
Lyon
69004
France

Phone +33 (0)472 072865
Email daniel.flammang@yahoo.fr
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/006evg656

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Medtronic, Inc. (USA)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 03/01/2012 29/12/2020 Yes No

Editorial Notes

29/12/2020: The following changes have been made:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The final enrolment number has been added from the reference.