Study of the effectiveness of the addition of Capecitabine to a standard regimen containing Adriamycin®, Cyclophosphamide and Docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment in large or locally advanced breast cancers

ISRCTN ISRCTN00407556
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN00407556
EudraCT/CTIS number 2007-003221-25
Secondary identifying numbers 07H0406260
Submission date
03/03/2011
Registration date
20/05/2011
Last edited
14/02/2018
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in the UK. Chemotherapy treatment involves using drugs to kill the cancer cells. Chemotherapy can be used before surgery to shrink large tumours or tumours that have spread within the breast region (locally advanced), in order to make the surgery possible or less disfiguring. This is called neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study is to find out whether adding capecitabine to the standard treatment of adriamycin, cyclophosphamide and docetaxel increases the anti-cancer response.

Who can participate?
Women between 18 and 75 years of age with large or locally advanced breast cancer

What does the study involve?
All patients receive adriamycin and cyclophosphamide. Patients who respond well receive further courses and are randomly allocated to receive either docetaxel or a combination of docetaxel with capecitabine. Patients who do not respond well to adriamycin and cyclophosphamide are randomly allocated to receive either docetaxel or a combination of docetaxel with capecitabine. Patients are treated with lenograstim on days 2-6 of each cycle of chemotherapy.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Possible benefits of the treatment include enhanced anti-cancer response and reduced toxicity (side effects). All patients receiving chemotherapy are at risk of side effects from the drugs used.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
November 2008 to December 2011

Who is funding the study?
Roche, Sanofi Aventis and Chugai Pharma (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Prof. Oleg Eremin
oleg.eremin@ulh.nhs.uk

Contact information

Prof Oleg Eremin
Scientific

Lincoln County Hospital
Greetwell Road
Lincoln
LN2 2QY
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1522 573 872
Email oleg.eremin@ulh.nhs.uk

Study information

Study designSingle-centre randomised study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the conatct details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleA phase II, single-centre, randomised study of the effectiveness of the addition of Capecitabine to a standard regimen containing Adriamycin®, Cyclophosphamide and Docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment in large or locally advanced breast cancers
Study acronymXINACT
Study objectivesThe addition of capecitabine to Adriamycin®, cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in the neoadjuvant setting improves the pathological response rate in patients with large or locally advanced breast cancer
Ethics approval(s)Leicestershire, Northamptonshire & Rutland Ethics Committee, 06/06/2008, ref: NAC071
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedLarge or locally advanced breast cancer
Intervention1. All patients will receive adriamycin (A, 60 mg/m2, iv three weekly) and cyclophosphamide (C, 600 mg/m2, iv three weekly)
2. Patients who respond to two courses of AC will be randomised to continue to receive two further courses of AC followed by either four courses of docetaxel (100 mg/m2, iv three weekly) [Group A] or will receive a combination of docetaxel (75 mg/m2, iv three weekly) with capecitabine (2,000 mg/m2, orally in two divided doses for two out of three weeks) [Group B]
3. Nonresponders will be randomised to receive either docetaxel (100 mg/m2, iv three weekly) for up to six courses [Group C] or a combination of docetaxel (75 mg/m2, iv three weekly) with capecitabine (2,000 mg/m2, orally in two divided doses for two out of three weeks) [Group D]
4. Lenograstim will be given at 263 µg daily by sc injection on days 2-6 of each cycle of chemotherapy after stratification
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhasePhase II
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Adriamycin®, Cyclophosphamide, Docetaxel, Lenograstim
Primary outcome measurePathological response in the breast and axilla, as assessed by the pathologist, following completion of chemotherapy and surgery, using established criteria. The chemotherapy is given over 24 weeks, the surgery is carried out 4 weeks later, and the pathology is available 2 weeks after surgery
Secondary outcome measures1. Firstly, to document the QoL and related morbidity with these novel drug combinations, including the use of granulocyte colonomy stimulating factor (G-CSF) in a primary prophylactic setting
2. The quality of life assessment is carried out during the study, the last questionnaire is filled after the last cycle of chemotherapy
3. The questionnaire’s data is entered into an SPSS database and will be evaluated at the end of the trial
4. To define, accurately and reliably, the predictive value of response to chemotherapy of specific proteins/genes, previously identified and characterised in an in vitro study
5. To evaluate the host defences in the contribution of these defences to the beneficial effects documented, women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy
6. To assess the effectiveness of MRM as a predictor of early clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The magnetic resonance mammography findings are entered into an SPSS database and will be evaluated at the end of the trial
7. The genomic/proteomic and immune parameters are ongoing studies which will continue for an unspecified period after completion of the clinical part of the study
Overall study start date01/11/2008
Completion date30/12/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexFemale
Target number of participants130
Key inclusion criteria1. Women with histologically confirmed carcinoma of the breast, with measurable or evaluable large (greater than or equal to 3 cm) or locally advanced (T3, T4, TxN2) disease
2. Women who are over 18 and under 75 years and able to sign the informed consent
Key exclusion criteria1. World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status 2, 3 and 4
2. Prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy unless for basal cell carcinoma
3. Unstable angina and/or evidence of significant cardiac dysfunction
4. Patients who have diabetes requiring insulin
5. Pregnancy or lactation
6. Inadequate organ function, as evidenced by any of the following laboratory values:
6.1. Absolute neutrophil count < 1500/uL
6.2. Platelet count < 100,000/uL
6.3. Total bilirubin > 1.5 mg/dL
6.4. Alkaline phosphatase, AST, and/or ALT > 2x upper limit of normal
6.5. Serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL
6.6. Urine protein/creatinine ratio > 1.0 at screening
7. Inability to complete Quality of Life questionnaires
8. Contraindications for modified radical mastectomy (MRM), including contrast media safety, are as for standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Date of first enrolment01/11/2008
Date of final enrolment30/12/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Lincoln County Hospital
Lincoln
LN2 2QY
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Trust Headquarters
Lincoln County Hospital
Greetwell Road
Lincoln
LN2 4AX
England
United Kingdom

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/0377kyv52

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Roche (UK): Educational grants, drugs supplied

No information available

Sanofi Aventis (UK): Educational grants

No information available

Chugai Pharma (UK): Drugs supplied

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 02/02/2018 Yes No

Editorial Notes

14/02/2018: Publication reference added.
07/04/2016: Plain English summary added.