An intervention to reduce sexual risk after Post-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV following Sexual Exposure (Project PEPSE)

ISRCTN ISRCTN00746242
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN00746242
Secondary identifying numbers 11436
Submission date
06/01/2012
Registration date
06/01/2012
Last edited
24/05/2019
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Carrie Llewellyn
Scientific

Division of Public Health & Primary Care
Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
Village Way
Falmer
Brighton
BN1 9PH
United Kingdom

Email c.d.llewellyn@bsms.ac.uk

Study information

Study designPreventative, interventional randomised trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleMulticentre RCT and economic evaluation of a psychological intervention together with a leaflet to reduce risk behaviour amongst men who have sex with men (MSM) prescribed post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV following sexual exposure (PEPSE)
Study acronymPEPSE
Study hypothesisMen who have sex with men (MSM) are most affected by HIV in the UK and they are increasingly likely to engage in risky sexual behaviour. One to one behavioural interventions, such as motivational interviewing (MI) have been recommended to reduce HIV in high risk groups by National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the UK, as part of current STI/HIV service provision. MSM who receive a preventative regimen of HIV treatment after potential sexual exposure to HIV (PEPSE) are at particularly high risk of later acquiring HIV and therefore could greatly benefit from targeted risk reduction interventions, so as to reduce the likelihood of further risk behaviour, subsequent infection and costs to the National Helath Service (NHS) in the UK.

Aims:
1. Examine whether MI is effective in reducing risky sexual behaviour in MSM prescribed PEPSE compared to ‘usual treatment’.
2. Examine whether motivational interviewing increases adherence to PEPSE and whether the intervention could represent ‘value for money’ to the NHS.

HIV is a condition affecting both length and quality of life, even with highly effective treatments. Therefore, a relatively low-cost intervention for MSM that is effective in reducing the likelihood of risky sexual behaviour and further HIV infections will not only directly benefit recipients, but also the wider MSM community and the NHS as a whole.
Ethics approval(s)National Research Ethics Service (NRES) Committee South East Coast, Surrey, 14 July 2011 ref: 11/LO/0718
ConditionInfectious diseases and microbiology
InterventionRCT conducted in Brighton and London is proposed. Participants will be MSM who have been prescribed PEP after sexual exposure.

Those randomised to receive the intervention will receive two telephone administered sessions of motivational interviewing (MI) augmented by information and skills training. Each telephone session will be a maximum of 30 minutes long. The second session will contain similar content to the first but will reiterate and build on the risk reduction motivation from session 1. In the case of drop-out between the 2 intervention sessions, a dose-response can then be assessed. The interventionist will initially assess individual risk behaviours and any informational, motivational or skill deficits which have contributed to maintenance of participants.

This group will be compared to a ‘treatment as usual’ control group. Individuals will be followed up for one year to determine whether the intervention has long term effects on sexual behaviour. ‘Value for money’ will be estimated by conducting an economic evaluation, where the costs and health outcomes of the interventions are compared.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureThe proportion of risky sexual practices measured at 3, 6 and 12 months after the end of treatment
Secondary outcome measuresNo secondary outcome measures
Overall study start date03/01/2012
Overall study end date01/04/2013

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexMale
Target number of participantsUK Sample Size: 250
Total final enrolment175
Participant inclusion criteria1. Men who have sex with men (MSM)
2. Minimum age =16 years
3. A prescription for PEP after sexual exposure
4. Attending a Genito-Urinary Medicine (GUM) clinic
5. Willing and able to give written, informed consent
Participant exclusion criteriaThe following groups of patients will be excluded: those that do not consider themselves to be MSM, patients under the age of 16 years, people who have received previous psychological support from a clinical psychologist in relation to their sexual risk taking; people with learning difficulties; people unable to read study materials; people with no means of communication acceptable to the patient; people who are seeking PEP after sexual assault.
Recruitment start date03/01/2012
Recruitment end date01/04/2013

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Division of Public Health & Primary Care
Brighton
BN1 9PH
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Clinical Investigation and Research Unit (CIRU)
Royal Sussex County Hospital
Eastern Road
Brighton
BN2 5BE
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1273 696 955
Email ciru.reception@bsuh.nhs.uk
Website http://www.bsuh.nhs.uk/

Funders

Funder type

Government

NIHR - Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date26/10/2019
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 22/03/2012 Yes No
Results article results 23/05/2019 24/05/2019 Yes No

Editorial Notes

24/05/2019: Publication reference and total final enrolment number added.
26/10/2018: An intention to publish date has been added.