Injectable versus oral opioid maintenance treatment for heroin addicts currently failing to benefit from standard treatment: a three way Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of injectable heroin versus injectable methadone versus oral methadone maintenance

ISRCTN ISRCTN01338071
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN01338071
Secondary identifying numbers KCL/SLaM-CT2004-3
Submission date
14/09/2007
Registration date
27/09/2007
Last edited
26/09/2014
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof John Strang
Scientific

National Addiction Centre
Addiction Sciences Building
4 Windsor Walk
Denmark Hill
London
SE5 8AF
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designMulti-site open-label randomised controlled trial to compare the safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of prescribing injectable opiates versus optimised oral methadone
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study acronymRIOTT (Randomised Injectable Opioid Treatment Trial)
Study hypothesisThe research objective of the trial is to examine the safety, efficacy and cost effectiveness of treatment with injectable methadone or injectable heroin compared to optimised oral methadone treatment, for patients not responding to their current oral maintenance treatment episode.

Hypotheses:
1. A selected group of patients (not responding to usual oral methadone treatment) receiving injectable heroin treatment or injectable methadone treatment, will make greater reductions in their illicit heroin use, other drug use and criminal activity and greater improvements in their health and social functioning, than if provided with optimised oral methadone treatment
2. Providing injectable heroin or injectable methadone to a selected group of patients (not responding to usual oral methadone treatment) results in a greater economic benefit per extra unit of resource invested in the treatment, than only offering optimised oral methadone
Ethics approval(s)1. Institute of Psychiatry Ethics Committee for single-site study, 26/02/2004, ref: 291/03
2. London MREC for multi-site study, 03/06/2006, ref: 06/MREC02/22
ConditionOpiate dependence/addiction
InterventionPatients randomised to receive optimised oral methadone treatment will receive methadone treatment under enhanced conditions. The intervention will include high methadone doses (at least 80 mg), supervised dispensing of medications contingent upon levels of unsanctioned drug use (daily supervised dosing initially), and patients will be expected to attend for regular key worker and medical appointments. Methadone is a semi-synthetic opioid used in the treatment of opioid drug dependence to prevent opioid withdrawal syndrome by substituting for heroin.

The injectable methadone group will receive treatment with once-daily injectable (intraveous [IV]/intramuscular [IM]) methadone ampoules. There will be full supervision of all injected doses. Patients will be expected to attend for regular key worker and medical appointments. Patients will be able to supplement their injectable methadone dose with prescribed oral methadone doses. Methadone Hydrochloride B.P. for injection is a colourless, preservative and oxidant free solution in clear glass ampoules.

Those receiving injectable heroin will receive treatment with injectable (IV/IM) heroin ampoules, administered under supervision up to twice a day. Patients will be expected to attend for regular key worker and medical appointments. Patients will be able to supplement their injectable heroin dose with prescribed oral methadone doses. Diacetylmorphine hydrochloride (Diamorphine hydrochloride, heroin hydrochloride, heroin) is a opioid used in the treatment of opioid drug dependence. All injections are supervised in the clinic.

All those receiving injectable treatment or optimised oral methadone treatment will receive named keyworker and frequent reviews and ancillary services. The total duration of treatment and follow-up is 6 months.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Heroin, methadone
Primary outcome measureReduction in illicit heroin, measured by urine drug screens taken on a weekly basis over 6 months.
Secondary outcome measuresSelf-reported to researcher at baseline, 3 months and 6 months (in or out of treatment):
1. Changes in illicit heroin use:
1.1. Number of days used illicit heroin in past 30 days
1.2. No days injected/smoked/snorted illicit heroin in past 30 days
1.3. Average cost of illicit heroin on days used
1.4. Frequency of use in past month, as measured by the Drug Use Section of Opiate Treatment Index (OTI Q score)
2. Changes in other illicit opiate drug use (non-prescribed):
2.1. Injectable opioid pharmaceuticals (methadone, heroin)
2.1.1. Days used in past 30 days
2.1.2. Average cost
2.1.3. Estimate quantity on average day of use
2.2. Oral methadone/morphine:
2.2.1. Days used in past 30 days
2.2.2. Average cost
2.2.3. Estimate quantity on average day of use
2.3. Codeine/codeine like preparations:
2.3.1. Days used in past 30 days
2.3.2. Average cost
2.3.3. Estimate quantity on average day of use
3. Changes in illicit cocaine use:
3.1. Number of days used crack/cocaine in past 30 days
3.2. No days injected/smoked/snorted in past 30 days
3.3. Average cost of cocaine on days used
4. Other illicit drug use and alcohol - benzodiazepines, alcohol, cannabis:
4.1. No days used past 30 days
4.2. Average quantities consumed (estimated as diazepam mg equivalents; units alcohol; grams cannabis)
4.3. Average cost of each drug used on average day
5. Changes in high-risk injecting practices:
5.1. Participation in risk practices for blood borne virus transmission in preceding month using the Injecting Risk Questionnaire, with responses pegged according to number of times occurred in the past month
5.2. Assessment of injecting practices using self-report scale developed for the trial
6. Changes in general health status:
6.1. 36-item Short Form health survey (SF-36)
6.2. Euro-QoL instrument (EQ-5D)
7. Changes in psychosocial functioning:
7.1. 36-item Short Form health survey (SF-36)
7.2. Euro-QoL instrument (EQ-5D)
7.3. Psychosocial Adjustment Section of the OTI
8. Changes in criminality: self-report using adapted OTI Crime Section of MAP
9. Use of other health and social services: health, social and voluntary sector services used, days off work due to illness, criminal justice sector contacts - adapted REDUCE questionnaire for cost effectiveness analysis
10. Measures of patient expectation of and satisfaction with treatment
10.1. Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire
10.2. Drug Use, Expectations and Satisfaction Questionnaire to measure benefits and problems with using street heroin (developed for the trial) and expectations and satisfaction of treatment received whilst on trial (developed for trial)

In addition, we are monitoring injecting practices and complications, any post dosing side effects and serious and non-serious adverse event data and collecting data on retention.
Overall study start date01/07/2004
Overall study end date30/06/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit65 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants150
Participant inclusion criteriaThe selection criteria targets heroin users with a long-standing history of injecting heroin use who continue to inject heroin frequently whilst in their current episode of methadone treatment. Selection criteria include:
1. History of injecting heroin use sufficient to meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria
2. Aged between 18 and 65 years at recruitment to study
3. In continuous methadone treatment for at least 6 months this episode
4. Regular injecting heroin use
Participant exclusion criteria1. No active significant medical (e.g., hepatic failure) or psychiatric condition (active psychosis, severe affective state) as determined by study medical officer
2. Not alcohol dependent or abusing benzodiazepines according to DSM-IV revised criteria
3. Not pregnant, breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant during the study period
4. Able and willing to participate in the study procedures (e.g., no impending prison sentence) and provide informed consent
Recruitment start date01/07/2004
Recruitment end date30/06/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

National Addiction Centre
London
SE5 8AF
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Kings College London (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

c/o Dr Gill Dale
Director of Research Quality
Joint R&D Office of South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry
P005 Institute of Psychiatry
De Crespigny Park
London
SE5 8AF
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.kcl.ac.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/015803449

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Action on Addiction (UK) - Big Lottery Fund (research part of trial) (ref: PR/1/010256258)

No information available

National Treatment Agency (UK) - clinical part of trial (ref: 2007/08)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 29/05/2010 Yes No
Results article secondary outcome results 01/03/2015 Yes No