Positive reinforcement targeting abstinence in substance misuse
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN01591254 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN01591254 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | 6113 |
- Submission date
- 19/11/2012
- Registration date
- 19/11/2012
- Last edited
- 05/07/2021
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Some people being receiving opioid substitution treatment (OST) with drugs like methadone, subutex, or suboxone either drop out of treatment early or continue to use heroin. Researchers in the USA have found that drug treatment clinics can help service users stay in treatment and reduce their heroin use by offering them shop vouchers. We call this positive reinforcement or contingency management (CM). Contingency Management has a strong evidence base in the US and has been recommended by National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) for UK implementation. However, the UK has little track record of applying contingency management in drug treatment. To find out if positive reinforcement might be helpful in reducing use of street heroin among opiate users receiving OST here in the UK, the aim of this study is to compare providing usual OST (methadone or subutex) to providing usual treatment with positive reinforcement.
Who can participate?
Heroin users, men and women, aged over 18 years, presenting to drug clinics for opiate treatment
What does the study involve?
The participating clinics are randomly allocated to one of three treatments: usual treatment (OST plus key work sessions), usual treatment plus positive reinforcement of attendance or usual treatment plus positive reinforcement of abstinence. Incentives are vouchers exchangeable for goods/services. After week 12, the contingency management is stopped and all participants receive only usual care. Urine samples are collected at various stages of the study. The practical problems encountered in recruiting sites, clinical staff and patients to this trial are examined.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no immediate benefits from taking part. Participants have a chance of receiving shop vouchers for attending interviews and key work sessions or providing urine samples negative for heroin. Participants involvement in the research could help improve the care provided at drug treatment clinics. The information from this research could help improve opiate treatment programmes in the future. However, participants may be asked to attend more key work sessions and provide more urine samples than usual.
Where is the study run from?
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
November 2012 to April 2014
Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Dr Nicola Metrebian
nicola.metrebian@kcl.ac.uk
Contact information
Scientific
Addictions Department
Institute of Psychiatry
King's College London
4 Windsor Walk
Denmark Hill
London
SE5 8AF
United Kingdom
| nicola.metrebian@kcl.ac.uk |
Study information
| Study design | Multi-centre stratified cluster randomised trial |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Interventional |
| Secondary study design | Cluster randomised trial |
| Study setting(s) | Hospital |
| Study type | Treatment |
| Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet |
| Scientific title | Cluster randomised controlled trial of two Contingency Management schedules targeting treatment attendance or abstinence from street heroin use in people treated for heroin dependence |
| Study acronym | PRAISe |
| Study objectives | Contingency Management (CM) is a psychological intervention using positive reinforcement (usually in the form of praise and vouchers which can be exchangeable for goods) to encourage engagement with treatment and to promote behaviours congruent with treatment goals. This intervention is delivered as an adjunct to existing opiate substitute treatment. The aim of this trial is to implement, observe and assess the acceptability, feasibility and clinical and cost effectiveness of Contingency Management (CM) strategies to improve treatment attendance and abstinence from heroin. |
| Ethics approval(s) | NRES Committee South East Coast - Surrey, 25/07/2012, ref: 12/LO/0910 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Mental Health Research Network; Addictions |
| Intervention | Each of the 33 clinics will be their own cluster. Each clinic/cluster will be randomly assigned to one of the following trial arms (i.e., 20 participants per cluster, 11 clusters per arm, 220 participants in each arm and 660 in total): 1. TAU + 12 week schedule of weekly keywork appointments (no praise or voucher) 2. TAU + 12 week positive reinforcement (praise and voucher) for attending scheduled weekly keywork appointments 3. TAU + 12 week positive reinforcement (praise and voucher) for providing a weekly urine sample negative for opiates Both CM schedules will offer the same valve of incentive over a 12 week period, but with different target behaviours (attendance vs abstinence). Incentives will be vouchers exchangeable at general supermarket chains. Results are compared for the primary outcome at the 3rd month (weeks 9-12) in all three treatment conditions. The outcome of the trial will be determined by the mean number of urine tests results negative for opiates during weeks 9-12. After week 12, there will be complete cessation of rewards. In the follow-up phase (weeks 13-24) all participants will receive identical care with no CM. All primary and secondary outcomes at 12 weeks will be reassessed at 24 weeks for all participants. In addition, the number of opiate-negative urine test results during weeks 21-24 will be assessed. The trial data will also be used to model differential costs of the two CM schedules vs current practice. A process evaluation will be conducted alongside the trial, in order to understand the implementation, delivery, fidelity and outcome of the trial intervention. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure | Mean number of opiate negative urine test results during weeks 9-12 |
| Secondary outcome measures | 1. Retention in treatment at the 3-month and 6-month follow-up 2. Urine test results at the 6-month follow-up (3 months post-CM) 3. Indices of physical, psychological and social well-being 4. Health economic and criminal justice outcomes |
| Overall study start date | 12/11/2012 |
| Completion date | 30/04/2014 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | Both |
| Target number of participants | UK Sample Size: 660; Description: 33 clusters each with 20 participants |
| Total final enrolment | 552 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Aged >18 years 2. Seeking new episode of OST treatment 3. Agree to 12 week treatment programme promoting abstinence 4. Regular users of street heroin in preceding month (self report 15/30 use and all UDS in past 4 weeks opiate positive) 5. Opiate dependent (meeting ICD-10 criteria) and at liberty to participate in the study for 24 weeks 6. Willing and able to provide informed consent 7. Male or female |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Pregnant or breastfeeding 2. Active mental health problem 3. Patients referred into treatment under a criminal justice order 4. Patients who cannot read English AND require the service of an interpreter to understand a brief oral description of the study |
| Date of first enrolment | 19/11/2012 |
| Date of final enrolment | 30/04/2014 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
SE5 8AF
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Hospital/treatment centre
c/o Ms Jenny Liebscher
SLaM R&D Office
Room W1.08
Institute of Psychiatry
De Crespigny Park
Denmark Hill
London
SE5 8AF
England
United Kingdom
| Website | http://www.slam.nhs.uk/ |
|---|---|
"ROR" |
https://ror.org/015803449 |
Funders
Funder type
Government
No information available
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protocol article | protocol | 01/08/2018 | Yes | No | |
| Results article | 01/07/2021 | 05/07/2021 | Yes | No |
Editorial Notes
05/07/2021: The following changes have been made:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The final enrolment number has been added from the reference.
26/10/2020: The recruitment start date was changed from 12/11/2012 to 19/11/2012.
07/08/2020: Internal review.
19/06/2018: Publication reference added.
24/01/2017: No publications found, verifying study status with principal investigator.
