Understanding pathways to maths achievement in year nine pupils: an exploration of working memory and metacognitive skills
ISRCTN | ISRCTN02293102 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN02293102 |
Secondary identifying numbers | N/A |
- Submission date
- 20/06/2012
- Registration date
- 18/07/2012
- Last edited
- 29/01/2018
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Other
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
One-to-one tutoring is a common form of support offered in schools for pupils underachieving in mathematics, but there is little evidence that it is effective. It is therefore vital that we evaluate its effectiveness. Studies have also found that working memory (short-term memory) is associated with maths achievement. For example, children who completed a computer-based working memory training programme (CogMed) showed increased maths achievement. Working memory training has also been found to have broader benefits including reduction of anxiety. This study will therefore explore the effectiveness of these two interventions on maths achievement in secondary school pupils. Specifically, it will investigate the impact of a working memory training programme and one-to-one tutoring on mathematics achievement, working memory, and maths anxiety in pupils who show difficulties in maths in the first year of their GCSE course (year nine).
Who can participate?
Pupils in year nine (age 13/14) underachieving in mathematics at the participating secondary school in Hampshire.
What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to one of two groups. One group receives one-to-one maths tutoring with a qualified teacher for one hour, twice a week, for five weeks. The other group use CogMed for 35 minutes a day for at least 20 days over five weeks. Participants complete maths, working memory and anxiety tests on three occasions.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
This study may provide data about effective ways to support maths achievement, which may benefit pupils. There are no real risks, but pupils may feel negative after completing anxiety questionnaires.
Where is the study run from?
Southampton University (UK).
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
June 2012 to July 2013.
Who is funding the study?
Southampton University (UK).
Who is the main contact?
Emma Walker
ew1g10@soton.ac.uk
Contact information
Scientific
University of Southampton
Shackleton Building
Highfield Campus
Southampton
SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom
Study information
Study design | Single-centre randomised controlled study |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | School |
Study type | Other |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet |
Scientific title | Understanding pathways to maths achievement in year nine pupils: an exploration of working memory and metacognitive skills - a randomised control study |
Study objectives | It is hypothesised that the computerised working memory intervention will improve maths achievement via an increase in working memory capacity and a decrease in anxiety. It is also hypothesised that one to one tutoring will improve maths attainment, but this will be achieved through improved metacognition. |
Ethics approval(s) | 1. University of Southampton Ethics Committee, 19/06/2012 2. Research Governance Office, 20/06/2012 |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Pathways to mathematical achievement |
Intervention | One to one mathematics tutoring Half of the participants will receive one to one maths tutoring at school with a qualified teacher, for one hour, twice a week, for five weeks. All maths tutoring content is based on a set of objectives devised by the school based on common 'gaps' in this group's knowledge. The tutor's role is to develop a pupil's understanding of how to use strategies for solving maths problems. CogMed The other half of the participants will use CogMed, a computerised working memory training programme facilitated by the researcher. Participants will work for 35 minutes a day in school for at least 20 days over five weeks on computer based tasks designed to develop verbal and visuo-spatial short term and working memory, which adapt trial by trial to required difficulty level. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | Mathematics achievement (standardised score and national curriculum levels) Pre- measures will be collected in July 2012, post measures in October/November 2012 and follow-up in January 2013. |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Working memory (standard score) 2. Metacognition (questionnaire score) 3. Maths anxiety (questionnaire score) 4. Generalised anxiety score (questionnaire score) Pre- measures will be collected in July 2012, post measures in October/November 2012 and follow-up in January 2013. |
Overall study start date | 25/06/2012 |
Completion date | 23/07/2013 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Other |
---|---|
Age group | Child |
Lower age limit | 13 Years |
Upper age limit | 14 Years |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 24 |
Key inclusion criteria | Participants will be selected if their school has chosen them to receive one to one tutoring. Criteria for this are: 1. Achieved National Curriculum (NC) level 3a - 4c at the end of Key Stage 2 (KS2) (age 11 years) and failed to reach benchmark of NC level 5 by end of year 8 (age 13 years). 2. On roll at participating secondary school 3. In year nine (age 13/14 years) |
Key exclusion criteria | Persistent school absence (below 80% attendance) |
Date of first enrolment | 25/06/2012 |
Date of final enrolment | 23/07/2013 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
University/education
Shackleton Building
Highfield Campus
Southampton
SO17 1BJ
England
United Kingdom
https://ror.org/01ryk1543 |
Funders
Funder type
University/education
Government organisation / Universities (academic only)
- Alternative name(s)
- University of Southampton UK
- Location
- United Kingdom
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Editorial Notes
29/01/2018: No publications found, verifying study status with principal investigator.