Theta Burst Stimulation for motor impairment after stroke
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN03884521 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN03884521 |
| Protocol serial number | 3279; G0401353 |
| Sponsor | University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK) |
| Funder | Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK) (ref: G0401353) |
- Submission date
- 29/04/2010
- Registration date
- 29/04/2010
- Last edited
- 26/07/2013
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Ms Ulrike Hammerbeck
Scientific
Scientific
Institute of Neurology
Queen Square London
Queen Square
London
WC1N 3BG
United Kingdom
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Randomised interventional treatment trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | Enhancing the effect of physical therapy for motor impairment after stroke with Theta Burst Stimulation |
| Study acronym | TBS Study |
| Study objectives | In this study we plan to investigate whether brain stimulation can be used as an add-on treatment to consolidate the benefit from patterned upper limb physiotherapy and induce further hand motor improvement in chronic stroke patients. To stimulate the brain we plan to use Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS), a novel paradigm of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), aiming to increase cortical excitability of the affected (ipsilesional) hemisphere. According to evidence so far, we believe that increased ipsilesional excitability can be achieved by: 1. Direct facilitation of the affected hemisphere (ipsilesional facilitation) 2. Inhibition of the unaffected hemisphere (contralesional inhibition) Primary aim: To investigate whether daily treatment with TBS followed by patterned physical therapy for a period of two weeks can lead to significant and sustained improvement of hand motor behavior in chronic stroke patients. Secondary aims: 1. To study the physiological correlates of the potential behavioral gains 2. To identify physiological predictors of likelihood of response to the proposed intervention, so that appropriate patients may be targeted in future trials Physiological correlates will be studied using TMS and functional magentic resonance imaging (fMRI) as detailed below. |
| Ethics approval(s) | NHNN and ION Joint Research Ethics Committee approved on the 25/02/2005 (ref: 04/Q0512/108) |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Topic: Stroke Research Network; Subtopic: Rehabilitation; Disease: Therapy type |
| Intervention | Physical therapy (physiotherapy): The protocol for physical therapy has been developed in collaboration with the therapy services department at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery. It expands upon previous protocols by ensuring the equivalence of task intensity, repetition rate and verbal feedback across subjects. Treatment will be task oriented and individualised based on the findings of a questionnaire about current functional difficulties and an objective examination. Theta Burst Stimulation: TMS is a well tolerated method of stimulating the human cortex through the intact scalp. We will employ a new pattern of repetitive TMS called Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS). Each burst consists of 3 low intensity (80% aMT, see further on) stimuli, repeating at high frequency (50Hz). Bursts are repeating at 5Hz, i.e. the "theta" rhythm of the EEG. A total of 15 pulses are delivered per second. TBS effect on corticospinal excitability can be either inhibitory of facilitatory, depending on the pattern. Follow up length: 3 months Study entry: single randomisation only |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Action Research Arm Test, measured at initial assessment, 2 day post-intervention follow-up, 1 month follow-up and 3 month follow-up. |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
1. Electrophysiological measures of corticospinal excitability, intracortical interactions and interhemispheric balance, measured at initial assessment, 2 day post-intervention follow-up, 1 month follow-up and 3 month follow-up |
| Completion date | 31/12/2010 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 45 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. History of a single ischaemic stroke, initially affecting the hand 2. Minimum interval since stroke onset one year (no upper limit) 3. Residual impairments of hand function (strength and/or dexterity) 4. Some degree of hand movement defined as present wrist extension (>=20%) and ability to grasp 5. Capable of giving informed consent 6. Aged 18 - 80 years, either sex |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Intracerebral hemorrhage 2. Large ischaemic lesions involving almost the whole MCA territory 3. Significant tone problems in the hand (greater than 2 in the Ashworth Scale) 4. Severe cognitive impairment defined as mini-mental state examination (MMSE) less than 20 5. Residual aphasia or visual field defect (greater than or equal to 2 in the relative item of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]) 6. Past or current history of other neurological or psychiatric disease including epilepsy, previous or recurrent stroke and peripheral neuropathy 7. Major systemic illness 8. Use of anticonvulsant, psychotropic or sedative or medication 9. Excessive use of alcohol or other substances 10. Accepted contraindications for TMS (presence of metal in the head (excluding the mouth), intracardiac lines, cardiac pacemakers) |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/11/2005 |
| Date of final enrolment | 31/12/2010 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
- Italy
Study participating centre
Institute of Neurology
London
WC1N 3BG
United Kingdom
WC1N 3BG
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 01/10/2012 | Yes | No | |
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |