Condition category
Neonatal Diseases
Date applied
17/09/2009
Date assigned
24/09/2009
Last edited
07/09/2016
Prospective/Retrospective
Prospectively registered
Overall trial status
Completed
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Babies born prematurely are at increased risk of episodes of bacterial infection, which can lead to longer hospital stay, long-term complications, and may be fatal. This is largely because preterm babies have immature defences against infection. An important way in which the body is protected is through the 'friendly bacteria' that normally thrive in our gut and promote its health. At birth there are few organisms in the gut and healthy babies who are nursed with their mothers quickly become colonised with their 'friendly' bacteria. Preterm babies who are separated from their mother at birth are more likely to become colonised with bacteria in the environment of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit that may cause disease. We think that if we begin to give babies a few drops of liquid containing 'friendly bacteria' (probiotic) daily starting soon after birth that these bacteria will multiply in the intestine, improve the general health of the intestine and reduce the chance of potentially pathogenic (harmful) organisms becoming established. This should reduce the possibility of infection caused by organisms invading the bloodstream from the gut, and of severe complications such as necrotising enterocolitis, a serious condition of the gut. There is some evidence for the beneficial effects of probiotics but they have not been adequately tested in a study involving more than one hospital and including the babies at greatest risk. Probiotics do seem to be safe, but again more data are needed. The study will test whether a simple product containing a single probiotic bacterium prevents bloodstream infections and necrotising enterocolitis in preterm babies.

Who can participate?
Babies less than 48 hours old, who were born before 31 completed weeks of gestation

What does the study involve?
Babies are randomly allocated to be fed either the probiotic or a placebo (inactive substance). We then measure the following in both groups: episodes of infection, episodes of necrotising enterocolitis, deaths, growth, use of antibiotics, and length of hospital stay.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Not provided at time of registration

Where is the study run from?
Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
December 2009 to August 2013

Who is funding the study?
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme - HTA (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Prof. Kate Costeloe
kate.costeloe@homerton.nhs.uk

Trial website

https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/pips

Contact information

Type

Scientific

Primary contact

Prof Kate Costeloe

ORCID ID

Contact details

Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry
Neonatal Unit
Homerton University Hospital
Homerton Row
London
E9 6SR
United Kingdom
-
kate.costeloe@homerton.nhs.uk

Additional identifiers

EudraCT number

2006-003445-17

ClinicalTrials.gov number

Protocol/serial number

HTA 05/501/04; BBG001 v 2

Study information

Scientific title

The probiotic Bifidobacterium breve strain BBG-001 administered early to preterm infants to prevent infection, necrotising enterocolitis and death: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial

Acronym

PiPS

Study hypothesis

Does early enteral administration to preterm infants, of the probiotic Bifidobacterium breve strain BBG started soon after birth, reduce the number of cases of:
1. Late onset (after 72 hours) blood stream infection
2. Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), a serious condition of the gut
3. Death

More details can be found at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/hta/0550104
Protocol can be found at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/51213/PRO-05-501-04.pdf

Ethics approval

Oxfordshire REC A, 12/05/2009, ref: 09/H0604/30

Study design

Multi-centre double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial

Primary study design

Interventional

Secondary study design

Randomised controlled trial

Trial setting

Hospitals

Trial type

Prevention

Patient information sheet

https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/downloads/files/pips/PiPS-Parent-Information-Leaflet.pdf

Condition

Blood stream infection and necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants

Intervention

The investigational product to be tested is Bifidobacterium breve strain BBG (B breve BBG). The product is supplied freeze dried with corn starch; the placebo is corn starch alone. Both products are manufactured in identical foil sachets each containing 1 gram of product.

The freeze dried powder is suspended, the starch allowed to settle and the supernatant administered to the baby. In order that the active product and placebo cannot be distinguished both are suspended in 3 ml 1/8 strength (1 scoop to 240 ml sterile water) of the elemental infant formula NeocateĀ® and allowed to settle for 30 minutes. 1 ml of supernatant is withdrawn to be given to the baby; for the active product this contains 2.7 +/-0.5 X 10^9 colony forming organisms. The products are administered via a naso-gastric or oro-gastric tube or, for babies no longer tube fed, directly into the mouth using a syringe.

The intervention will be given once daily starting as soon as possible after randomisation and continuing until 36 completed weeks of post-menstrual age (36 weeks + 0 days) or death or discharge from hospital if sooner.

1,300 babies will be recruited over 30 months. The trial will have ended when the last recruited baby is discharged from hospital or dies.

Intervention type

Biological/Vaccine

Phase

Drug names

Primary outcome measures

1. Any baby with an episode of blood stream infection, with any organism other than a skin commensal, diagnosed on a sample of blood drawn more than 72 hours after birth and before death or discharge from hospital. Skin commensals include coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) and Corynebacteria.
2. Necrotising enterocolitis, Bell stage II or III. Duration of follow-up: until discharge from hospital or death.
3. Death before discharge from hospital

Secondary outcome measures

1. Number of babies with the composite outcome of any or a combination of the 3 primary outcomes.

Microbiological outcomes:
Outcomes 2 to 7 are for samples taken more than 72 hours after birth and before death or discharge home:
2. Number of babies with any positive blood culture with an organism recognised as a skin commensal e.g. CoNS or Corynebacteria
3. Number of babies with blood cultures taken
4. Number of blood cultures taken per baby
5. Number of babies with episodes of blood stream infection with organisms other than skin commensals by organism: e.g. E.Coli, Klebsiella spp, fungi, and by antibiotic resistance types: specifically methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) and extended spectrum betalactamase producing Gram negative bacteria (ESBL)
6. Number of babies with isolates of organisms other than skin commensals from a normally sterile site other than blood: e.g. CSF, supra-pubic aspiration of urine, pleural cavity etc.
7. Number of babies with a positive culture of B breve BBG from any normally sterile site

Also:
8. Total duration of days of antibiotics and/or anti-fungals administered per baby after 72 hours and until death or discharge from hospital for treatment of suspected or proven sepsis i.e. excluding prophylactic use
9. The number of babies colonised with the administered probiotic strain defined by the isolation of B breve BBG from stool samples at 2 weeks post-natal and at 36 weeks post-menstrual age
10. Stool flora: the number of babies colonised with MRSA, VRE or extended spectrum betalactamase producing Gram negative bacteria (ESBL) at 2 weeks post-natal and at 36 weeks post-menstrual age

Nutritional and gastroenterological outcomes:
11. Age at achieving full enteral nutrition (defined as 150 ml/kg/day for 1 day)
12. Change of weight Z score from birth to 36 weeks post-menstrual age or discharge from hospital if sooner

Other clinical outcomes:
13. Broncho-pulmonary dysplasia. Duration of follow-up: until discharge from hospital or death.
14. Hydrocephalus and/or intraparenchymal cysts confirmed by cerebral ultrasound scan performed during the baby's in-patient stay
15. Worst stage of retinopathy of prematurity in either eye at discharge or death
16. Length of stay in intensive, high dependency and special care (British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM) 2001: definitions)

Overall trial start date

01/12/2009

Overall trial end date

31/08/2013

Reason abandoned

Eligibility

Participant inclusion criteria

1. Both males and females, born before 31 completed weeks of gestation, i.e. up to and including 30 weeks + 6 days by the best estimate of Expected Date of Delivery (usually by first trimester antenatal ultrasound, alternatively calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period [LMP])
2. Less than 48 hours old
3. With written informed parental consent
4. Babies already on antibiotics for suspected or proven infection are eligible for recruitment to the study

Participant type

Patient

Age group

Neonate

Gender

Both

Target number of participants

1,300

Participant exclusion criteria

1. A lethal congenital abnormality known at trial entry
2. Any known gastrointestinal malformation
3. No realistic prospect of survival

Recruitment start date

01/12/2009

Recruitment end date

31/08/2013

Locations

Countries of recruitment

United Kingdom

Trial participating centre

Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry
London
E9 6SR
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Organisation

Queen Mary, University of London (UK)

Sponsor details

Joint Research Office
Queen Mary's Innovation Centre
Lower Ground Floor
5 Walden Street
London
E1 2AN
United Kingdom
+44 (0)20 7882 7250
janine.amar@bartsandthelondon.nhs.uk

Sponsor type

University/education

Website

http://www.qmul.ac.uk/

Funders

Funder type

Government

Funder name

Health Technology Assessment Programme

Alternative name(s)

NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA

Funding Body Type

government organisation

Funding Body Subtype

Federal/National Government

Location

United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

Not provided at time of registration

Intention to publish date

Participant level data

Not provided at time of registration

Results - basic reporting

Publication summary

2015 results in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26628328
2016 results in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27594381

Publication citations

Additional files

Editorial Notes

07/09/2016: Publication reference added. 06/05/2016: Plain English summary added.