Surgery versus stent for malignant gastro-duodenal obstruction

ISRCTN ISRCTN06702358
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN06702358
Secondary identifying numbers NTR531; 945-06-503
Submission date
14/02/2006
Registration date
14/02/2006
Last edited
05/01/2010
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Digestive System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr S M Jeurnink
Scientific

Erasmus Medical Center
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Room HS 510
P.O. Box 2040
Rotterdam
3000 CA
Netherlands

Phone +31 (0)65 495 4623
Email s.jeurnink@erasmusmc.nl

Study information

Study designRandomised multicentre active-controlled parallel-group trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleSurgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic duodenal stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a randomised study
Study acronymSUSTENT study
Study objectivesTo compare a surgical procedure (gastrojejunostomy [GJJ]) with endoscopical stent placement in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO).
Ethics approval(s)Received from the local medical ethics committee
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedGastric outlet obstruction (GOO)
Intervention1. Duodenal stent placement
2. Gastrojejunostomy
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureTotal area under the survival curve, adjusted for the ability to eat at least soft solids (GOOSS score of 2 or more).
Secondary outcome measures1. Procedure-related (within 7 days) and long term (later than 7 days) minor and major complications
2. Reinterventions or recurrent obstructions
3. Survival, calculated from day of randomisation
4. Health related quality of life, including the perceived burden of the procedure, burden of reintervention and generic and disease specific HRQoL
5. Cost and cost-effectiveness
Overall study start date01/01/2006
Completion date31/12/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexNot Specified
Target number of participants150
Key inclusion criteria1. Obstructive cancer (more than 25% of the circumference as seen by endoscopy) extending from the distal duodenum
2. Gastric outlet obstruction scoring system (GOOSS) score of 0 (no oral intake) or 1 (liquids only)
3. Incurable or metastatic disease
4. Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria1. Evidence of other strictures in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract
2. Previous gastric, periampullary or duodenal surgery
3. Previous (palliative) treatment for the same condition
4. World Health Organization (WHO) performance score of 4 (patient is 100% of time in bed)
5. Unable to fill out quality of life questionnaires
Date of first enrolment01/01/2006
Date of final enrolment31/12/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam
3000 CA
Netherlands

Sponsor information

Erasmus Medical Centre (Netherlands)
Hospital/treatment centre

Dr Molewaterplein 40/50
Rotterdam
3000 CA
Netherlands

Website http://www.erasmusmc.nl/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/018906e22

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) (Netherlands)
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
Alternative name(s)
Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
Location
Netherlands

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 14/10/2006 Yes No
Results article results 01/03/2010 Yes No
Results article results on cost effectiveness 01/05/2010 Yes No