Sun exposure for vitamin D sufficiency in skin type V

ISRCTN ISRCTN07565297
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN07565297
Secondary identifying numbers 5625
Submission date
12/05/2010
Registration date
12/05/2010
Last edited
26/04/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mrs Marie Durkin
Scientific

Photobiology Unit
Dermatological Sciences
Hope Hospital
Stott Lane
Salford
M6 8HD
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designSingle centre non-randomised prevention and treatment trial
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designSingle-centre
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleSun exposure levels for provision of vitamin D sufficiency in people of skin type V living in the UK
Study objectives1. What is the effect on vitamin D status in people of skin type V, of the amount of UV exposure recommended for white Caucasian subjects, and how much extra UV exposure do skin type V people require?

Intervention study:
A UV course will be given to 60 subjects in January/February, using a whole body cabinet with lamps emitting a UV spectrum similar to sunlight. Blood 25(OH)D levels measured weekly.

2. What levels of vitamin D are attained through natural sunlight exposure in skin type V individuals living in the UK? How do these relate to personal UV exposure doses? Does the relationship differ from that in white Caucasian individuals?

Observation study:
125 subjects will have blood 25(OH)D levels assessed once in each season, UV exposure measured through polysulphone badges and dietary vitamin D assessed through diet diaries.

The results of the experimental work in the intervention study can be related to the findings of the real population in the observation study. Moreover, both studies in skin type V volunteers can be related to the findings of the equivalent studies in the white Caucasian subjects.
Ethics approval(s)North Manchester Research Ethics Committee approved on the 20th May 2008 (ref: 08/H1006/24)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedTopic: Skin; Subtopic: Skin (all Subtopics); Disease: Dermatology
Intervention1. Intervention study:
1.1. Subjects were given simulated summer's sun exposures from a constant UVR dose via a full body cabinet, 3 times a week for 6 weeks. The subjects were split into 6 groups receiving either 0.65, 1.3 1.95, 2.6, 3.2, 3.9 SED. This was given in Jan/Feb, when there is no confounding ambient UVR
1.2. Vitamin D (25(OH)D) blood samples were taken pre-intervention and then weekly for 6 weeks
1.3. Patients completed diet diaries (1st week and 6th week) to assess dietary vitamin D

2. Observational study:
2.1. Vitamin D (25(OH)D) blood samples were taken in each season of the year (April - Spring, July - Summer, October - Autumn, January - Winter)
2.2. The subjects were also given polysulphone film badges to wear on their clothes for one week in each season to measure ambient UV
2.3. Sun exposure diaries were also used to give additional information about seasonal UV exposure
2.4. A diet diary was completed in each season for dietary vitamin D assessment.
Follow up was for one year.

The interventional follow up was for 7 weeks, the actual intervention (not treatment) was carried out over 6 weeks.
Intervention typeSupplement
Primary outcome measure1. Intervention study: % number of people reaching sufficient levels of vitamin D following simulated summer exposure
2. Observational study: the post summer vitamin D level required to maintain sufficiency throughout the winter months
Secondary outcome measuresInterventional study:
1. The % numbers reaching optimal levels of vitamin D following simulated summer sun exposure
2. Baseline winter levels of vitamin D deficiency, sufficiency and optimal levels
Overall study start date01/09/2008
Completion date30/05/2009

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned sample size: 185
Key inclusion criteria1. Aged 18 - 65 years old
2. South Asian descent
3. Male or female
4. Sun-reactive skin type V
5. Ambulant
Key exclusion criteria1. History of skin cancer (intervention study)
2. History of a photosensitivity disorder (both)
3. Regular sunbathing/use of sunbeds (observational study)
4. Sunbathing/use of sunbeds in the past 3 months (intervention study)
5. Taking photoactive medication (interventional)
6. Pregnant or breast-feeding (interventional)
Date of first enrolment01/09/2008
Date of final enrolment30/05/2009

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Photobiology Unit
Salford
M6 8HD
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Manchester (UK)
University/education

c/o Mohammed Zubair
FMHS Research Office
3.53 Simon Building
University of Manchester
Manchester
M13 9PL
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.manchester.ac.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/027m9bs27

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Cancer Research UK (CRUK) (UK)
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
Alternative name(s)
CR_UK, Cancer Research UK - London, CRUK
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/11/2011 Yes No
Results article results 01/06/2013 Yes No