Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial At Term (DIGITAT)

ISRCTN ISRCTN10363217
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10363217
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
20/12/2005
Registration date
20/12/2005
Last edited
27/05/2014
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Dr K. Boers
Scientific

Leiden University Medical Centre
Department of Obstetrics
K6-27
P.O. Box 9600
Leiden
2300 RC
Netherlands

Phone +31 (0)71 5262872
Email k.e.boers@lumc.nl

Study information

Study designMulticentre randomised active-controlled parallel-group trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific title
Study acronymDIGITAT
Study objectivesEarly induction of labour being an effective intervention e.g. for the prevention of neonatal neurologic morbidity for foetus with established disproportionate intrauterine growth retardation.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received from the local medical ethics committee
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedIntrauterine Growth Failure
InterventionWomen will be randomly allocated to induction of delivery (intervention group) or expectant monitoring group (expectant group).

Foetal condition will be assessed using foetal heart rate pattern, sonographic measurement of amniotic fluid index, and Doppler measurement of the a. umbilicalis and a. cerebri media. If women are allocated to intervention, labour will be induced within 48 hours after randomisation. The method of induction will be at the obstetrician's discretion. Cervical ripening with prostaglandins, osmotic cervical dilatation or digital sweeping of the membranes is optional.

The use and timing of amionotomy and the timing and use of oxytocine regime (if used) will all follow local practice. Participants allocated to this group will not have labour induced unless the foetal condition or maternal condition requires a clear indication for this develops. They will be observed according to local practice until labour starts spontaneously. Foetal monitoring will be according to local practice. However, the minimal monitoring will include a weekly measurement of the umbilical artery Doppler waveform.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureUnder the condition of equal short-term neonatal outcome, the primary outcome will be the number of obstetrical interventions.

Neonatal outcome:
1. Umbilical cord pH less than 7.10
2. Base Excess less than -10
3. Apgar at 5 minutes less than 7
4. Neonatal admittance to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)
Secondary outcome measures1. Costs
2. Assessment of children later in life; postal enquiries as the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) will be used
Overall study start date01/04/2005
Completion date01/04/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target number of participants600
Key inclusion criteria1. Women with a presumed diagnosis of growth failure greater than 36 completed weeks
2. Women are identified initially by clinical assessment of foetal growth between 35 and 39 weeks. After identification, patients will be referred for foetal biometry, a non-stress test and Doppler ultrasound of the umbilical artery and the a. cerebri media
3. Patients in whom the diagnosis of growth failure greater than 36 is confirmed, and in whom the obstetrician is uncertain whether delivery is indicated or not are eligible for the study
4. The final entry criteria are an accurate ultrasound dating scan before 20 weeks and clinical suspicion of failure to thrive in-utero after 36 completed weeks or later, while the clinician is uncertain whether to induce or to await spontaneous delivery
Key exclusion criteria1. Multiple pregnancy
2. Obstetrical history with caesarean section
3. Breech
4. Inaccurate dating of gestational age
5. Suspected congenital malformation
6. Foetal distress needing delivery
Date of first enrolment01/04/2005
Date of final enrolment01/04/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

Leiden University Medical Centre
Leiden
2300 RC
Netherlands

Sponsor information

Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC) (Netherlands)
University/education

Albinusdreef 2
P.O. Box 9600
Leiden
2300 RC
Netherlands

Website http://www.lumc.nl/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/027bh9e22

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) (The Netherlands)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol to compare methods of validation: 04/07/2007 Yes No
Protocol article protocol 10/07/2007 Yes No
Results article results 21/12/2010 Yes No
Results article economic analysis results 01/10/2013 Yes No
Other publications secondary analysis 01/01/2014 Yes No