Condition category
Not Applicable
Date applied
03/11/2014
Date assigned
29/12/2014
Last edited
29/03/2016
Prospective/Retrospective
Prospectively registered
Overall trial status
Completed
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Elderly people aged 75 years and older account for a large and increasing number of admissions to acute hospitals. There is evidence to suggest that older paper rate the care that they receive in hospital in terms of the kindness, compassion and respectful communication they get from hospital staff. Healthcare assistants (HCAs) provide an increasing amount of direct care to older people, but their training needs are often overlooked. Here, we want to test a training programme (intervention) that has been designed to improve the care given by HCAs, comparing it to the usual training currently being offered.

Who can participate?
Acute hospital wards where 50% or more of inpatients are aged 70 years and above. Healthcare assistants employed to provide care in one of the recruited wards. All patients aged 70 years and over discharged from one of the recruited wards during the four weeks before and following the intervention (study) period.

What does the study involve?
Recruited wards are randomly allocated to either the ‘training in relational care’ or ‘training as usual’ group. HCAs from wards randomised to the new training package receive training in relational care. HCAs from wards randomised to ‘training as usual’ receive their usual training. The success of the new training package is assessed at the ward, individual HCA and patient level. It includes measuring patient experience, the quality of interaction between HCAs and patients, and changes in both empathy and attitude of HCAs towards older patients. Ward and HCA level outcomes are measured before the intervention training begins and again after its completion. Patient-level outcomes are measured after discharge from hospital during periods before and after the intervention training.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
As we are training healthcare assistants we do not anticipate any risks to patients.

Who is leading the study?
The study is led by the University of East Anglia in collaboration with King’s College London and the University of Nottingham.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
March 2015 to October 2015

Who is funding the study?
National Institute of Health Research under their Health Services and Delivery Research programme (NIHR 12/129/10) (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Professor Antony Arthur
antony.arthur@uea.ac.uk

Trial website

Contact information

Type

Scientific

Primary contact

Prof Antony Arthur

ORCID ID

Contact details

Edith Cavell Building
School of Health Sciences
University of East Anglia
Norwich Research Park
Norwich
NR4 7TJ
United Kingdom
01603 591094
antony.arthur@uea.ac.uk

Additional identifiers

EudraCT number

ClinicalTrials.gov number

Protocol/serial number

NIHR 12/129/10

Study information

Scientific title

Can Health care Assistant Training improve the relational care of older people? A development and feasibility study of a complex intervention

Acronym

CHAT

Study hypothesis

The study will test whether it is feasible to deliver and measure the effect of healthcare assistant training in the relational care of older people within acute hospitals in England using a cluster RCT.

Ethics approval

Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee, 13/02/2015, ref: 15/EE/0025

Study design

Multicentre pilot cluster randomised controlled trial

Primary study design

Interventional

Secondary study design

Randomised controlled trial

Trial setting

Hospitals

Trial type

Treatment

Patient information sheet

Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet.

Condition

Healthcare of older people

Intervention

1. HCAs in wards randomised to relational care training will receive two one-day training sessions approximately one week apart. Training will be delivered by HCA trainers based at each of the participating hospitals. Day 1 will introduce and begin to explore aspects of relational care for older patients. At the end of Day 1 HCAs will also be asked to undertake brief unstructured individual study prior to Day 2 and further training support in the form of e-learning will also be available by computer and mobile device. Day 2 will build upon Day 1 and explore further aspects of relational care.
2. HCAs in wards not randomised to relational care training will receive 'training as usual', typically restricted to periods of staff induction or focussed on mandatory training requirements such as manual handling.

Intervention type

Phase

Not Applicable

Drug names

Primary outcome measures

The primary outcome measure will be at the patient level:
We will use the Patient Evaluation of Emotional Care during Hospitalisation inventory (PEECH) . The PEECH contains 23 items and four subscales (levels of security, knowing, personal value, connection)

Secondary outcome measures

Secondary outcome measures will be taken at the level of ward and individual HCAs.
Ward outcomes:
1. To measure quality of interaction with older patients we will use the Care Kindness and Compassion Observation Tool. It is used to assess three domains of care:
1.1. General care
1.2. Patient and visitor engagement
1.3. Patient safety. Interactions are rated by an observer
2. HCA outcomes:
2.1. To measure change in empathy we will use the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ). The TEQ conceptualises empathy as an emotional process and contains 16 items.
2.2. To measure change in attitude towards older people we will use the age group evaluation and description (AGED) inventory, a measure of the extent to which stereotypes about ageing are held by the respondent.

Overall trial start date

01/03/2015

Overall trial end date

01/10/2015

Reason abandoned

Eligibility

Participant inclusion criteria

1. Ward inclusion criteria: general medicine or care of the elderly/older people wards where the median age of the inpatient population is 70 years or greater
2. Healthcare assistant inclusion criteria: healthcare assistants working either full time or part time within enrolled wards
3. Patient inclusion criteria: patients aged 70 years or over and discharged from an inpatient stay on an enrolled ward during the four-week period prior to the start of the intervention and during the four-week period following the end of the intervention

Participant type

Patient

Age group

Senior

Gender

Female

Target number of participants

12 wards, 96 HCAs, 200 patients

Participant exclusion criteria

1. Ward exclusion criteria: specialist dementia wards; medical admissions units
2. Health-care assistants exclusion criteria: healthcare assistants who are employed as bank staff and are not part of the named staff on the ward roster
3. Patients exclusion criteria: patients discharged to another ward or hospital

Recruitment start date

01/03/2015

Recruitment end date

01/10/2015

Locations

Countries of recruitment

United Kingdom

Trial participating centre

The School of Nursing Sciences
Edith Cavell Building
Norwich
NR4 7TJ
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Organisation

University of East Anglia (UK)

Sponsor details

c/o Mrs Susan Steel
Research and Enterprise Services
University of East Anglia
Norwich Research Park
Norwich
NR4 7TJ
United Kingdom
01603 591486
sue.steel@uea.ac.uk

Sponsor type

University/education

Website

Funders

Funder type

Government

Funder name

UK National Institute for Health Research under their Health Services and Delivery programme (NIHR HS&DR 12/129/10).

Alternative name(s)

Funding Body Type

Funding Body Subtype

Location

Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

Publication of results in NIHR report.

Intention to publish date

31/12/2016

Participant level data

Not expected to be available

Results - basic reporting

Publication summary

2015 protocol in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26646251

Publication citations

Additional files

Editorial Notes

29/03/2016: Ethics approval information and availability of participant level data added.