Comparison of spinal cord stimulation in combination with standard pain treatment versus standard pain treatment only in patients with intractable chronic back pain without previous history of spine surgery
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN10663814 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10663814 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov number | NCT06442410 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | DTM-INT-2020PM2 |
- Submission date
- 15/06/2020
- Registration date
- 29/06/2020
- Last edited
- 23/04/2025
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
It is estimated that about 20% of the population worldwide is affected by moderate to severe chronic pain. Chronic pain becomes a burden to the individual as this affects a person’s ability to carry out many daily life activities, such as exercising, walking, driving a car, attending social events, or performing household chores. Chronic pain is considered one of the most pervasive and intractable conditions affecting at least one-third of the population at an estimated cost of five hundred billion dollars per year, when combining health-related expenditure and the cost-impact on loss of productivity and income.
Conventional medical management (CMM), including medication and physical therapy, is often not adequate for treating chronic pain. Medication therapy based on opioids may also lead to addiction. When these treatments fail to provide pain relief, imaging is performed to assess candidacy for back surgery. However, surgery is only indicated for those patients with mechanical instability or pinched nerves. For the many patients for whom imaging does not clearly show a cause of chronic back pain, or for the patients that have other medical issues preventing an invasive surgical procedure, there are few alternative treatment options. Furthermore, surgical interventions have also failed to resolve severe cases of neuropathic pain and intractable back pain for many patients.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a proven therapy that has been in use for about 50 years for various types of chronic pain. SCS is a reversible therapy that allows patients to evaluate the therapy for several days using an external neurostimulator before receiving an implantable neurostimulator (INS) system. SCS involves the surgical placement of two leads (which look like very thin wires) into a small area near the spinal cord. Electrical stimulation is delivered through these wires by a small, battery-operated, rechargeable SCS implanted generator. There is good evidence to recommend SCS in people with back pain without a history of spinal surgery, particularly because SCS is a less invasive and reversible therapy that may provide greater long-term benefits than more invasive surgical approaches.
This study will evaluate SCS programming with conventional medical management in comparison to conventional medical management alone for chronic back pain sufferers with or without leg pain and who are not considered candidates for spine surgery.
Who can participate?
Adults aged 18 and older who have chronic back pain
What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to one of two groups. Those in the first group receive SCS. Those in the second group receive medical pain management as per the Center’s usual practice. SCS involves the surgical placement of two leads (which look like very thin wires) into a small area near the spinal cord. Electrical stimulation is delivered through these wires by a small, battery-operated, rechargeable SCS implanted generator. Each participant is followed for 24 months. The participants attend regular clinic visits to complete questionnaires and to provide feedback on their pain.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants may benefit from both treatments (SCS and conventional medical management) to relieve their pain. There are no direct risks of taking part in this study, although the general risks of having a spinal stimulation device in place apply.
Where is the study run from?
1. Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia (Spain)
2. AZ Delta Roeselare (Belgium)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2020 to March 2024
Who is funding the study?
SGX International LLC (USA)
Who is the main contact?
Ms Thanh Tran, thanh.tran2@medtronic.com
Contact information
Scientific
Principal Clinical Research Specialist, Pain Therapies, Medtronic, 7000 Central Ave NE
Minneapolis
MN 55432
United States of America
| Phone | +1 727 808 2652 |
|---|---|
| thanh.tran2@medtronic.com |
Study information
| Study design | Multi-centre prospective randomised study |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Interventional |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study setting(s) | Hospital |
| Study type | Treatment |
| Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use contact details to request a participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | Comparison of differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation therapy combined with conventional medical management to conventional medical management alone in the treatment of intractable back pain subjects without previous history of lumbar spine surgery |
| Study acronym | EU RCT DTM SCS vs CMM |
| Study objectives | This study is being conducted to document the safety, clinical effectiveness and health economics of Differential Target Multiplexed (DTM) Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) delivered through the Intellis neurostimulator (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in subjects with chronic back pain who are not considered candidates for spine surgery. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Approved 10/06/2020, Commission Medical Ethics AZ Delta (ZIekenhuis Roeselare-Menen, Deltalaan 1, 8800 Roeselare, Belgium; +32 (0)56 52 22 31; mec.mail@azdelta.be), ref: B1172020000014 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Chronic back pain without previous history of lumbar spine surgery |
| Intervention | Participants are randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the control or the intervention group. Those in the intervention group receive the DTM SCS therapy. SCS involves the surgical placement of two leads (which look like very thin wires) into a small area near the spinal cord. Electrical stimulation is delivered through these wires by a small, battery-operated, rechargeable SCS implanted generator. The control group received the Conventional Medical Management (CMM). CMM is the standard treatment provided for chronic back pain patients if not treated with a spinal cord stimulation system – Active Comparator is DTM SCS + CMM, the device which will be used is the Intellis neurostimulator (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Each participant is followed for 24 months. The participants attend regular clinic visits to complete questionnaires, and to provide feedback on their pain. The treatment for both groups is expected to last a total of 24 months. |
| Intervention type | Device |
| Pharmaceutical study type(s) | |
| Phase | Not Applicable |
| Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s) | Intellis neurostimulator (Medtronic, USA) using DTM SCS |
| Primary outcome measure | Individual responder rate measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) (as defined by at least a 50% reduction in pain) at 6 months |
| Secondary outcome measures | 1. Successful back pain relief measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months 2. Percentage of patients who experience at least 50% reduction in pain intensity measured using the VAS at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months 3. Back pain intensity measured using VAS at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months Removed 27/01/2022 (these were incorrectly listed as secondary outcome measures. In the protocol they are indicated as additional measures): 4. Disability measured using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months 5. Quality of life measured using EQ-5D & SF-12 questionnaire at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months 6. Health economic outcomes measured using clinic visits, incidence of adverse events, EQ-5D, SF-12 at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months |
| Overall study start date | 01/01/2020 |
| Completion date | 17/10/2023 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | Both |
| Target number of participants | 200 |
| Total final enrolment | 115 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Be a candidate for SCS system (trial and implant) 2. Have been diagnosed with chronic, refractory axial low back pain with or without lower limb pain with a neuropathic component as assessed by the investigator, and are not eligible for spine surgery (e.g., lumbar fusion, discectomy, laminectomy, laminotomy) at the time of enrollment 3. Has an average back pain intensity ≥ 6.0 cm on the 10.0 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the time of enrollment 4. Be willing and capable of giving written informed consent to participate in this clinical study based on voluntary agreement after a thorough explanation of the subject’s participation has been provided 5. Be willing and capable of subjective evaluation, read and understand written questionnaires, and read, understand and sign the written informed consent 6. Be 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment 7. Be on a stable pain medication regimen, as determined by the study investigator, for at least 30 days prior to enrolling in this study 8. Be willing and able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures, and visits |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Had previous lumbar spinal surgery (e.g., lumbar fusion, discectomy, laminectomy, laminotomy) 2. Has a medical, anatomical, and/or psychosocial condition that is contraindicated for commercially available IntellisTM SCS systems as determined by the Investigator 3. Has a diagnosed back condition with inflammatory causes of back pain (e.g., onset of severe pain with activity), serious spinal pathology and/or neurological disorders as determined by the investigator 4. Be concurrently participating in another clinical study 5. Has an existing active implanted device such as a pacemaker, another SCS unit, peripheral nerve stimulator, and/or drug delivery pump, etc. 6. Has a pain in other area(s) and/or medical condition requiring the regular use of significant pain medications that could interfere with accurate pain reporting, and/or confound evaluation of study endpoints, as determined by the Investigator 7. Has mechanical spine instability as determined by the Investigator 8. Has undergone, within 30 days prior to enrollment, an interventional procedure to treat back and/or leg pain, which is providing significant pain relief 9. Has unresolved major issues of secondary gain (e.g., social, financial, legal), as determined by the investigator 10. Be involved in an injury claim under current litigation or has a pending or approved worker’s compensation claim 11. Be pregnant (determined by urine testing unless female subject is surgically sterile or post-menopausal. If female, sexually active, and childbearing age, subject must be willing to use a reliable form of birth control) |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/08/2020 |
| Date of final enrolment | 27/10/2021 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Belgium
- Germany
- Netherlands
- Spain
Study participating centres
Valencia
46010
Spain
Roeselare
8800
Belgium
-
Belgium
-
Belgium
-
Germany
-
Germany
-
Netherlands
-
Netherlands
-
Netherlands
-
Spain
-
Spain
-
Spain
Sponsor information
Industry
2406 E. Empire St.
Bloomington
61704
United States of America
| Phone | +1 (0)818 527 2710 |
|---|---|
| clinical@sgxmedical.com |
Funders
Funder type
Industry
No information available
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | 31/03/2025 |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not expected to be made available |
| Publication and dissemination plan | The current publication plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date. |
| IPD sharing plan | The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not expected to be made available. |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | 28/06/2024 | 21/10/2024 | Yes | No | |
| Protocol file | Clinical Investigation Plan | 21/08/2020 | 23/04/2025 | No | No |
| Statistical Analysis Plan | version 3.0 | 05/05/2022 | 23/04/2025 | No | No |
Additional files
- ISRCTN10663814_Protocol_21Aug2020.pdf
- Clinical Investigation Plan
- ISRCTN10663814_SAP_v3.0_05May2022.pdf
Editorial Notes
23/04/2025: The following changes were made:
1. ClinicalTrials.gov number added.
2. Study participating centres: AZ Nikolaas, GZA - Sint Augustinus Ziekenhuis, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, München Klinik Bogenhausen, Rijnstate - Locatie Elst, Maastricht University Medical Center, Diakonessenhuis Locatie Zeist, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, and Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío were added.
3. The publication and dissemination plan was changed from "The protocol and other study documents are confidential and will not be made public. The current publication plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date.".
4. The study contacts were updated.
5. The clinical investigation and statistical analysis plans were uploaded.
09/04/2025: The individual participant data (IPD) sharing plan and summary were changed from being available upon request to not being available.
21/10/2024: Publication reference added.
26/02/2024: A scientific contact was added.
10/11/2023: The overall study end date was changed from 31/03/2024 to 17/10/2023.
31/05/2022: Total final enrolment added.
21/03/2022: Contact details updated.
27/01/2022: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The ethics approval details and secondary outcome measures were updated.
2. The recruitment end date was changed from 01/03/2022 to 27/10/2021.
3. The Netherlands was added to the countries of recruitment,
30/06/2020: Contact details updated.
16/06/2020: Trial's existence confirmed by Commission Medical Ethics AZ Delta.
