Remediating attention deficits in children with sensory processing dysfunction
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN10912124 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10912124 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | N/A |
- Submission date
- 09/09/2016
- Registration date
- 13/09/2016
- Last edited
- 15/09/2016
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Sensory Processing Dysfunction (SPD) is a condition in which the brain is unable to receive and respond to information that comes in through the senses (sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell) properly. A person with SPD finds it difficult to process information received through the senses, which can make performing everyday tasks very difficult and lead to withdrawal (avoidance) or seeking of sensory inputs (sights, sounds, etc.). Studies have shown that children with SPD also show signs of attention problems. The aim of this study is to understand if children with SPD would show benefit from an attention training iPad app.
Who can participate?
Children aged between 9-12 who have SPD and healthy children of the same age.
What does the study involve?
All participants are given access to the iPad app called ‘EVO’. Participants are asked to use the app 5 days a week for 4-weeks, with each day consisting of 7, 3-4 minute EVO sessions, with training occurring in the comfort of their own homes as opposed to a clinic or laboratory. Research assistants remotely monitor EVO play and provide support and feedback to the parents and children during training. If a research assistant notices a participant had more than two incomplete days of training, a reminder phone call would be made to the parents. Before using the app and then after 20 days of EVO training, children have their attention assessed and parents complete a questionnaire about their child’s inattention. The parent questionnaire is repeated again at nine months.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no direct benefits or risks associated with participating in this study.
Where is the study run from?
The study is run from University of California, San Francisco and takes place in participant homes (USA)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2014 to February 2015
Who is funding the study?
1. Mickelson-Brody Family Foundation (USA)
2. Wallace Research Foundation (USA)
3. James Gates Family Foundation (USA)
4. Kawaja-Holcombe Family Foundation (USA)
Who is the main contact?
1. Dr Joaquin Anguera (scientific)
2. Dr Elysa Marco (scientific)
Contact information
Scientific
University of California, San Francisco
675 Nelson Rising Lane
San Francisco
94158-0003
United States of America
 ORCID ID |
0000-0002-7216-0674 |
|---|
Scientific
University of California, San Francisco
675 Nelson Rising Lane
San Francisco
94158
United States of America
Study information
| Study design | Non randomised study |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Interventional |
| Secondary study design | Non randomised study |
| Study setting(s) | Home |
| Study type | Not Specified |
| Participant information sheet | No participant information sheet available |
| Scientific title | Differentially remediating attention deficits in children with Sensory Processing Dysfunction |
| Study objectives | Children with comorbid sensory processing dysfunction and parent-reported attention concerns would show greater benefit from an iPad-based attention intervention than those without attention concerns. |
| Ethics approval(s) | University of California, San Francisco Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board (IRB), 01/02/2014, ref: 10-01940 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Sensory processing dysfunction |
| Intervention | The intervention used in this trial is a cognitive training iPad application called ‘EVO’. EVO is an iPad-based program developed by Akili Interactive Labs, specifically designed as a medical device to assess and adaptively target improvements in cognitive control for populations with cognitive disorders and executive function deficits.The EVO intervention is a self-guided treatment designed for at-home use that involves a combination of visuomotor and perceptual discrimination tasks. Each training run consists entirely of the multitasking condition, and lasts approximately 4 minutes, with 7 training runs comprising one day of training. As the participants improve their performance throughout this intervention, they are transported to different visual “worlds” in the EVO universe, meant to immerse the player and enhance the depth of engagement and compliance. In addition, frequent EVO assessments are given to the player to obtain information as to how the player is improving throughout training, and adaptively set a personalized therapeutic regimen based specifically on the user’s own performance levels. Adaptive mechanics are employed in the training sessions. Since the adaptive mechanics strive to keep the player at ~80% accuracy, the player is challenged to constantly improve upon their own cognitive control performance in order to reach the next level. Treatment involved participant engagement with EVO 5 days a week for 1 month, with each day consisting of 7, 3-4 minute EVO sessions. After a participant completed 20 days of EVO training (~4 weeks), a follow-up research appointment was scheduled with the parents. In this trial our outcome measures were focused on attention as measured by direct assessment (computerized attention assessments), neural measurements (midline frontal theta), and parent reports of attention deficits (Vanderbilt Parent report). These assessments were collected before the intervention and immediately after. The parent questionnaire is also repeated 9 months after the intervention was completed. |
| Intervention type | Device |
| Pharmaceutical study type(s) | |
| Phase | |
| Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s) | |
| Primary outcome measure | 1. Cognitive control is measured from computerized assessments at baseline and 4 weeks 2. Midline frontal theta is measured using EEG at baseline and 4 weeks |
| Secondary outcome measures | Parent reports of inattention is measured via online questionnaires (Vanderbilt ADHD Parent Rating Scale) at baseline, 4 weeks and 9 months. |
| Overall study start date | 03/01/2014 |
| Completion date | 21/02/2015 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Mixed |
|---|---|
| Age group | Child |
| Lower age limit | 9 Years |
| Upper age limit | 12 Years |
| Sex | Both |
| Target number of participants | 65 |
| Key inclusion criteria | Sensory processing dysfunction (SPD) group: 1. A community diagnosis of SPD 2. A score on the Sensory Profile in the “Definite Difference” range (<2% probability) in one or more of the sensory domains (auditory, visual, oral/olfactory, tactile, vestibular, or multisensory processing) 3. Between the ages of 9-12 Typically developing controls (TDC): Between the ages of 9-12 |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Brain malformation or injury 2. Movement disorder 3. Bipolar disorder 4. Psychotic disorder 5. Hearing impairment 6. Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI) score <70 on the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children Fourth Edition (Wechsler, 2003) |
| Date of first enrolment | 20/02/2014 |
| Date of final enrolment | 01/02/2015 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United States of America
Study participating centre
San Francisco
94158-0003
United States of America
Sponsor information
University/education
675 Nelson Rising Lane
San Francisco
94158-0003
United States of America
"ROR" |
https://ror.org/043mz5j54 |
|---|
Funders
Funder type
Charity
No information available
No information available
No information available
No information available
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | 31/12/2016 |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Data sharing statement to be made available at a later date |
| Publication and dissemination plan | Planned publication will discuss the outcomes from the trial, specifically that the SPD group with comorbid inattention symptoms show the greatest improvement from the intervention |
| IPD sharing plan |
Editorial Notes
15/09/2016: Dr Elysa Marco has been added as an additional scientific contact.
