Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes following induction of labour
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN10984408 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10984408 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | 2.0 |
- Submission date
- 26/01/2016
- Registration date
- 02/02/2016
- Last edited
- 16/05/2016
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Pregnancy and Childbirth
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Although most labours begin naturally, however around one third of women need help to get started. In these cases, a healthcare professional will often “induce” labour. Although the aim of induction is to achieve a vaginal delivery, it is not always successful and some women end up having a caesarean section (an operation where the child is delivered through a cut in the abdomen). Currently, there are no effective methods to predict which women will not respond favourably to induction of labor or how long this process is likely to take. The aim of this study is to develop techniques to help predict whether induction will result in vaginal delivery or caesarean section.
Who can participate?
Women aged 18 or over with a single baby pregnancy, who have been scheduled for an induction of labour at Medway Maritime Hospital.
What does the study involve?
All women at Medway Maritime Hospital receive a routine clinical assessment in the pre-induction clinic, which involves an ultrasound scan of the baby, digital vaginal examination and a blood test. Participants are also offered an ultrasound scan to measure the length and dilation of the neck of the womb (cervix) and to find out how low the baby’s head is in the pelvis. For those agreeing to take part in the study, a swab of the vagina and another blood sample is taken to be tested in the laboratory for natural indicators (biochemical markers) as well as receiving an ultrasound scan which can help to predict the result of the induction. The amount of women who go into labour following induction are then recorded and compared to the results of prediction from the biochemical markers and ultrasound scan to find out how well the tests are able to predict the results of the induction.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no direct benefits or risks for participants taking part in this study.
Where is the study run from?
Medway Maritime Hospital (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
November 2015 to June 2017
Who is funding the study?
Fetal Medicine Foundation (UK)
Who is the main contact?
1. Dr Alexander Frick (public)
2. Mr Ranjit Akolekar (scientific)
Contact information
Public
Fetal Medicine Research Institute
16-20 Windsor walk
London
SE5 8BB
United Kingdom
 ORCID ID |
0000-0001-8013-3679 |
|---|
Scientific
Medway Maritime Hospital
Fetal Medicine Unit
Windmill Road
Gillingham
ME7 5NY
United Kingdom
Study information
| Study design | Single-centre prospective observational cohort study |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Observational |
| Secondary study design | Cohort study |
| Study setting(s) | Hospital |
| Study type | Screening |
| Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet. |
| Scientific title | Prediction Of adverse Pregnancy outcomes following INduction of labour in singleton pregnancies: A single centre observational study |
| Study acronym | POPIN |
| Study objectives | The aim of this study is to assess if a combination of ultrasound findings and biochemical markers from vaginal secretions and maternal blood can better predict vaginal delivery than traditional methods such as the Bishop Score. |
| Ethics approval(s) | London – Dulwich Research Ethics Committee, 31/03/2016, ref: 16/LO/0367 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Pregnancy and childbirth |
| Intervention | Women attending a pre-induction clinic who are participating in the study will have a vaginal swab taken to test levels of quantitative fetal fibronectin and placental alpha-macroglobulin-1 prior to induction of labour. They will also have a transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) to measure the angle of progression, head-perineum distance and sonographic assessment of cervical dilatation. The results from these assessments will be combined with maternal characteristics to predict mode of delivery. Patients will then be followed throughout the induction and labour process, with the transperineal ultrasound assessments repeated on a 4 hourly basis to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound with clinical vaginal examination. Women will be followed until delivery to determine the accuracy of the pre-induction test and intrapartum ultrasound assessments. The total duration of observation will vary from depending on the length of induction and labour, but will typically be 1-3 days. There will be no need for follow up after delivery. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure | Detection rate and false positive rate for predicting vaginal delivery following induction of labour is measured using a combination of maternal characteristics, ultrasound findings, and biochemical markers from a pre-induction clinic at the time of delivery. |
| Secondary outcome measures | 1. Detection rate for caesarean section for failure to progress is measured using a combination of maternal characteristics, ultrasound findings, and biochemical markers from a pre-induction clinic at the time of delivery 2. Detection rate for caesarean section for fetal distress is measured using a combination of maternal characteristics, ultrasound findings, and biochemical markers from a pre-induction clinic at the time of delivery 3. Detection rate for maternal haemorrhage greater than 1500 ml is measured using a combination of maternal characteristics, ultrasound findings, and biochemical markers from a pre-induction clinic at the time of delivery 4. Detection rate for neonatal intensive care admission is measured using a combination of maternal characteristics, ultrasound findings, and biochemical markers from a pre-induction clinic at the time of delivery 5. Effectiveness of intrapartum ultrasound in predicting vaginal delivery as compared to traditional vaginal examination is determined at the time of delivery |
| Overall study start date | 01/11/2015 |
| Completion date | 01/10/2017 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | Female |
| Target number of participants | 1000 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Female 2. Viable singleton pregnancy 3. Aged 18 years or over 4. Cephalic presentation 5. Attending pre-induction of labour clinic 6. Informed written consent |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Multiple pregnancies 2. Women with fetal demise 3. Women less than 18 years 4. Women who are unconscious or severely ill, those with learning difficulties, and serious mental illness 5. Malpresentation |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/03/2016 |
| Date of final enrolment | 01/03/2017 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Windmill Road
Gillingham
ME7 5NY
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Hospital/treatment centre
Windmill Road
Gillingham
ME7 5NY
England
United Kingdom
"ROR" |
https://ror.org/01apxt611 |
|---|
Funders
Funder type
Charity
Private sector organisation / Trusts, charities, foundations (both public and private)
- Alternative name(s)
- FMF
- Location
- United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | 31/12/2017 |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Available on request |
| Publication and dissemination plan | Planned publication in leading peer reviewed scientific journals for obstetric ultrasound, such is Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRA research summary | 28/06/2023 | No | No |
Editorial Notes
12/05/2016: Ethics approval information added.
