To compare the sodium and potassium values on a simple, faster handheld device with that of a central lab machine -which is time-consuming, to identify any abnormal values and decide on quick treatment on patients coming to the emergency department

ISRCTN ISRCTN11776777
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN11776777
Secondary identifying numbers 1
Submission date
03/06/2018
Registration date
06/06/2018
Last edited
02/04/2019
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
The area of the study is an emergency department, with patients presenting to emergency with acute/severe illnesses for example: chest pain (heart attacks), breathing difficulty (lung infections), stoppage of heart (cardiac arrest), brain strokes, poisoning are a few examples.
This study aims to determine whether a handheld arterial blood gas analyser (ABG), which produces results more quickly and is therefore beneficial to an emergency department, is as accurate as the central lab autoanalyzer at measuring sodium (Na+) and Potassium (K+) electrolytes.

Who can participate?
Adults aged above 18 years presenting to the emergency department

What does the study involve?
Eligible participants are treated as per the normal protocols of treatment, this study does not alter their treatment, routine care, hospital stay or outcome in terms of life or death of the participant, as it is just an observational study. Participants have blood samples taken and measured using a handheld arterial blood gas analyser and the central lab autoanalyzer.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no direct benefits or risks for participants in the study.

Where is the study run from?
NH Multispecialty Hospital (India)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
April 2016 to November 2017

Who is funding the study?
Narayana Hrudayalaya Limited (India)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Talha Hussain (public)

Contact information

Dr Talha Hussain
Public

Narayana Hrudulayala Pvt Ltd
NH Health city
Bommasandra
Anekal Taluk
Bangalore
560100
India

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-5469-316X

Study information

Study designA prospective observational cross-sectional cohort study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCohort study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeDiagnostic
Participant information sheet ISRCTN11776777_PIS_v1_06Jun18.docx
Scientific titleComparison of the point-of-care blood gas analyzer (ABG) versus the laboratory auto-analyzer (AA) for the measurement of electrolytes (Na+ and K+) in emergency department
Study objectivesThe null hypothesis states that there is no significant difference between electrolytes measured (sodium and potassium) using a handheld arterial blood gas analyzer (ABG) compared to the central lab autoanalyzer.
Ethics approval(s)Narayana Health Academics Ethics committee, 02/06/2016, ref: NHH/AEC-CL-2016-O57
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedEmergency medicine
InterventionThis prospective observational study with a sample size of 200 study is conducted in NH-Multispecialty Hospital, Bangalore, India, in the emergency department. 200 consecutive patients with paired (2) samples of Arterial (1) and Venous (1) blood are included.
The study period is 1 year. The values of sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) are measured using both a handheld arterial blood gas analyzer (ABG) and the central lab autoanalyzer, and compared using the paired t-test using R software. All results are expressed in mean +/- standard deviation.
Intervention typeDevice
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
Phase
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)
Primary outcome measureSodium (Na+) and Potassium (K+) levels are measured from blood samples using a handheld arterial blood gas analyzer (ABG) and the central lab autoanalyzer at the time of sample, to compare the accuracy of results.
Secondary outcome measuresNone
Overall study start date03/04/2016
Completion date30/11/2017

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants200 individuals
Key inclusion criteria1. Age above 18 years of either sex.
2. Patients presenting to ED with:
2.1. Unresponsiveness, with cardiac arrest without brain death
2.2. Hypovolemia
2.3. Patient in any form of shock: Hypovolumeic , Cardiogenic , Distributive , Septic
2.4. Anticipated sepsis and septic shock
2.5. Acute altered mental status
2.6. Acute respiratory distress
2.7. ACS
2.8. Cardiac rhythm disturbances
2.9. Seizures
2.10. CVA
2.11. Symptomatic patient with drug overdose
2.12. Poisoning – unknown compound/known
2.13. Abnormal blood sugar levels RBS < 40 mg% or >250 mg% or high unrecordable/low unrecordable blood sugars, by digital glucometers using capillary finger prick RBS.
2.14. Encephalopathies
2.15. Cardiac failure
2.16. AKI/CKD with acute symptoms
Key exclusion criteria1. Less than 18 years of age
2. Burns patients
Date of first enrolment30/06/2016
Date of final enrolment31/05/2017

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • India

Study participating centre

NH Multispecialty Hospital
No 1, Basanth Healthcare Center
Opposite HSR Club
HSR Layout
Sector 2
Bangalore
560102
India

Sponsor information

Narayana Hrudayalaya Limited
Hospital/treatment centre

NH Health City
258/A Bommasandra Industrial Area
Anekal Taluk
Bangalore
560099
India

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/05kx1ke03

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Narayana Hrudayalaya Limited

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date01/10/2018
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in International Journal of Emergency Medicine.
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Dr. Talha Hussain (principal investigator), talh0910@gmail.com

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Participant information sheet version v1 06/06/2018 02/04/2019 No Yes

Additional files

ISRCTN11776777_PIS_v1_06Jun18.docx
Uploaded 02/04/2019

Editorial Notes

02/04/2019: The participant information sheet has been uploaded.