On demand versus continuous use of omeprazole on reflux symptoms (3)

ISRCTN ISRCTN11976737
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN11976737
EudraCT/CTIS number 2014-001314-25
Secondary identifying numbers 18049
Submission date
04/03/2015
Registration date
05/03/2015
Last edited
29/10/2020
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Digestive System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) refers to a range of disorders mainly caused by the backward flow of acid from the stomach into the oesophagus (gullet). Heartburn and acid regurgitation (a bitter burning taste at the back of the mouth) are the most typical symptoms of GORD. GORD is a chronic disease (prevalence 10-20 % in Europe) that has a detrimental effect on a person’s quality of life (QoL). It is mainly treated in primary care (for example, the GP surgery) with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) once or twice a day, or on demand. There is conflicting data on which of these two treatment regimens is better and this lack of knowledge is likely to be related to the difficulties of performing large studies in primary care. In addition, patient reported outcomes such as symptom frequency and severity, QoL and self-rated health are important but are rarely used in primary care today. This study has been developed to answer the question “what gives most symptom relief and improvement in quality of life in patients with GORD, on demand or continuous use of proton pump inhibitors?”

Who can participate?
Adults aged between 18-65 years, diagnosed with GORD that responds to PPI treatment.

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated into one of two groups. Those in group 1 are treated with regular use of proton pump inhibitors. Those in group 2 are treated with on demand use of proton pump inhibitors. In this pilot study, the TRANSFoRm* tool is tested in 5 countries with 8 primary care practices each, including 20 patients per practice. The progress of each patient is followed for 8 weeks.
* TRANSFoRm is a project to develop tools to help in the running of clinical trials in primary care, including the collection of both care reported outcomes and patient reported outcomes . It also aims to develop a suite of software tools and underlying infrastructure to support primary and epidemiological research

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Not provided at time of registration

Where is the study run from?
Karolinska Institute (Sweden)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
March 2015 to May 2015

Who is funding the study?
The European Commission (Belgium)

Who is the main contact?
Ms Ellen Wright

Contact information

Ms Ellen Wright
Public

King's College Hospital
Division of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences
Capital House
42 Weston Street
London
SE1 3QD
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised; Interventional and Observational; Design type: Treatment, Qualitative
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use contact details to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleThe effect of on demand versus continuous use of proton pump inhibitors on reflux symptoms, quality of life and self-rated health in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
Study objectivesThe aim of this study is to determine what gives most symptom relief and improvement in quality of life in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD): on demand or continuous use of proton pump inhibitors
Ethics approval(s)14/WM/1196
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedTopic: Primary Care; Subtopic: Primary care; Disease: All Diseases
InterventionDrug treatment
Regular versus on demand dosing of omeprazole for control control of reflux symptoms.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
Phase
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)
Primary outcome measureReflux symptoms; Timepoint(s): At recruitment and at 8 weeks follow up
Secondary outcome measuresN/A
Overall study start date14/03/2015
Completion date31/05/2015

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit65 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 700; UK Sample Size: 140
Total final enrolment488
Key inclusion criteria1. Age 18-65 years
2. Predominant GORD cases with heartburn and/or acid regurgitation that need PPI treatment
3. PPI responsive
4. Ability to complete questionnaires
Key exclusion criteria1. Known Barrett’s oesophagus
2. Known severe oesophagitis (LA C or above)
3. Continuous use of NSAID/aspirin
4. Prophylactic PPI use to reduce the risk of ulcers in persons being treated with NSAIDs
5. PPI treatment to heal an ulcer induced by NSAID treatment in the last 6 months
6. PPI treatment for H. pylori eradication in the last 6 months
7. Severe disorders other than GORD with a negative impact on quality of life
8. Signs of upper gastrointestinal bleeding
9. Alarm symptoms: unintentional weight loss/vomiting/difficulties swallowing
10. Pregnancy
Date of first enrolment14/03/2015
Date of final enrolment31/05/2015

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

King's College Hospital
Division of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences
Capital House
42 Weston Street
London
SE1 3QD
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Karolinska Institute
University/education

-
Stockholm
171 77
Sweden

Email email@notknown
Website http://ki.se
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/056d84691

Funders

Funder type

Government

European Commission
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
European Union, Comisión Europea, Europäische Kommission, EU-Kommissionen, Euroopa Komisjoni, Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής, Европейската комисия, Evropské komise, Commission européenne, Choimisiúin Eorpaigh, Europskoj komisiji, Commissione europea, La Commissione europea, Eiropas Komisiju, Europos Komisijos, Európai Bizottságról, Europese Commissie, Komisja Europejska, Comissão Europeia, Comisia Europeană, Európskej komisii, Evropski komisiji, Euroopan komission, Europeiska kommissionen, EC, EU

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Abstract results results presented at the American Gastroenterological association (AGA) conference 01/05/2019 06/10/2020 No No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Editorial Notes

29/10/2020: The Karolinska Institute has been added as the trial sponsor.
06/10/2020: The following changes have been made:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The final enrolment number has been added from the reference.
3. King's College London has confirmed that it is not the sponsor and has therefore been removed from this section.
10/08/2020: No publications found.
09/08/2017: No publications found in PubMed, verifying study status with principal investigator.